Born From Kits: Volkswagen Invents The Incredible Money Machine

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

We have been writing about it for years, now, Bloomberg wakes up to it:

“Volkswagen AG will kick off its biggest technology overhaul in almost two decades.”

Bloomberg still has a hard time of coming to grips with the technological revolution. It’s not just that “more than 40 models will use a set of standardized components such as axles, steering columns and chassis,” as Bloomberg puts it. This is not a parts bin exercise. Through the Volkswagen empire, cars don’t just share the same steering columns. They are designed using standardized building blocks of a common kit architecture.

The kits have Teutonic names like “Modularer Querbaukasten” (MQB) and “Modularer Längsbaukasten” (MLB). Porsche is developing a “MMB” (Modularer Mittelbaukasten) for Mittelmotor (mid-engined) cars.

Volkswagen engineers are already working on the next generation of Baukastens, which could be the Mutter of all Baukasten.

According to Bloomberg, the exercise may lower costs by 5 billion Euros ($6.5 billion) a year, and cut assembly times by 30 percent.

Not quite understanding the kit architecture, Bloomberg raises the specter that one wrong bolt could now bring the whole company down. They cite Christoph Stuermer, a Frankfurt-based analyst with IHS Automotive, which is not known for its precise predictions:

“If something goes wrong, then one may get hit by an epidemic plague. The more connected the structures, the higher the threat of contagion.”

Volkswagen already has quite cleverly leveraged platforms across models, brands and segments. There is very little similarity between an Audi TT and a Volkswagen Beetle, despite them (and a panoply of others) sharing the same underpinnings. The kit architecture takes this principle to a new dimension. Properly executed, it can make for a very profitable car company. Juergen Pieper, an analyst with Bankhaus Metzler inFrankfurt, estimates that the technology will save 5 billion Euros by 2016, and says:

“The parts-sharing program is a very big lever to improve profitability that other companies don’t make use of because of the complexity. Without this cost-cutting program, margins wouldn’t likely rise from this year’s peak.”

Volkswagen reported an operating margin of 7.7 percent through the first nine months of 2011 and has a goal of lifting that to more than 8 percent by 2018. Without the new vehicle architecture, margins could average about 6 percent, said Pieper.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 28 comments
  • Daveainchina Daveainchina on Dec 20, 2011

    gslippy is right, this to me sounds like a new spin on an old idea. Ok sure the Audi doesn't share the same parts as the VW.. ya know what? I don't care, you line the cars up side by side, along with the Skoda (not available in the USA) in their respective size and the amount of differentiation is negligible. On top of that, package in the long wheelbase models that you get here in China and frankly it becomes nearly impossible to tell an A4L from an A6 and an A6L from an A8 While the company is certainly containing it's costs through all this shared architecture, they have become so ubiquitous here in Shanghai that they are even more bland looking than Japanese cars. If you guys think Toyota is the definition of bland looking cars, come here. VW/Audi I truly feel is the most bland looking car company for sale today. There is so little differentiation between car sizes and sub-brands that I frequently wonder why they are selling so many different brands. It's so bad here I actually get excited when I see a Lexus just for something different.

  • Stuki Stuki on Dec 21, 2011

    Now, all VW (or someone else) needs to do, is making the specs for each of these components/sub assemblies public, along with a compliance testing procedure; and the automotive industry would finally at least be attempting to play catchup with consumer electronics :)

  • Paul Alexander It seems to me that the electric cars are really ideal for those that can afford to install the infrastructure to charge at home and less than ideal for those of us who cannot. Putting in solar and a 240 outlet on your house makes a ton of sense, especially if you also have another non-electric car for long distance travel. Having an electric car as your only car and relying on public charging stations seems like a fools errand.
  • Tassos Germany is the biggest market in Europe, esp in cars. When the German government ended the subsidies for EVs, their sales in August PLUMMETED 70%! On top of a 40% plummet in July.
  • Theflyersfan Interest rates on car loans are still high. Limited number of buyers that can spend over $50,000 on any car. Unknown long-term reliability and battery issues. Charging infrastructure is still hit and miss, especially away from interstates. No easy solutions for those who have street parking at home on how they charge up. There's a lot of factors to weigh. But I think the biggest hurdle is still cost. Automakers want to show off their most expensive tech in their most expensive EVs and that means forget about huge chunks of the middle class being able to afford one. These fixes will come in time. I'm sure these same kinds of issues were discussed when ICE-powered cars were bursting on the scene over 100 years ago and people had to give up their horses.
  • Bd2 Union Trash.
  • 28-Cars-Later "“The consumer needs to be educated. Those batteries are proving to have 12-, 15-year life cycles, and most of us don’t even hold a vehicle for 12 or 15 years.”" So reading between the lines, Mr. Trotsky has decided there will be no more used cars as we know them. Unless BEVs designs accommodate battery cell repair/replacement (or will in the near future), Our Not Social Betters have decided to bring Logan's Run to the auto industry. But keep cheering for them proles while they laugh.
Next