By on November 7, 2011

GM’s China chief Kevin Wale poured a huge bucket of ice-cold water over hopes that China’s Pangda and Youngman will rescue Saab. The deal needs to be approved by the Chinese government, the European Investment Bank, the Swedish government and – GM.

Wale told Reuters today:

“It doesn’t make sense for us to support any change that might adversely affect us. We use global architectures and those global architectures are used in a number of products we make at SGM.”

In the last few days, Saab had been busy spinning the story that the Chinese government is all for the deal and that GM won’t dare to mess with it. Reality looks different.

Last Friday, GM spokesman Jim Cain told everybody who asked:

“GM would not be able to support a change in the ownership of Saab which could negatively impact GM’s existing relationships in China or otherwise adversely affect GM’s interests worldwide.”

The technology that is in current Saabs is all by GM, and is shared by many models produced in China at GM’s joint venture with SAIC. Even the new PhoeniX platform is not completely GM-free. The Chinese buyers want technology, and GM made it clear that they will not get it.

Just in case the subtlety of the GM comments went unnoticed by Saab et al (a crowd that tends to live in a parallel universe at times), the pouring of cold water went transcontinental. Later in the day, GM spokesman Jim Cain told Reuters and everybody who asked:

“Although General Motors is open to the continued supply of powertrains and other components to Saab under appropriate terms and conditions, GM will not agree to the continuation of the existing technology licenses or the continued supply of 9-4X vehicles to Saab following the proposed change in ownership as it would not be in the best interests of GM shareholders.”

Translation for the dense: We will sell parts to all comers with cash, but we will never agree that technology we own will be sold by someone else to someone else, dig?

Saabsunited still needed clarification, and Jim Cain provided it:

“As you can see in our statement, the issue of supplying components and power train and other things to Saab is something we’d be open to continuing under the right conditions, but when you talk about the 9-4X and the technology licenses, that is something we have to manage so carefully because it potentially impacts us in markets all over the world. We need to be able to control our own technology in order to be successful for the long term.”

“It’s a decision that we’ve made and wanted to be as clear as we possibly we could. How that impacts the way things develop from this day forward is something that Saab and Pang Da and Youngman have to discuss. Our piece has always been related to our role as a supplier and as a technology licensor.”

As reality began to sink in, Victor Muller claimed he had known it all along. In an interview with Sweden’s TTELA, Muller said:

“I warned about this all the time.”

“It required no great knowledge to predict this. I warned the Chinese all along that they wanted something that would not go down well at GM.”

This must have been a different Muller than the one that had said on Friday, October 28, when quizzed by Sverigesradio about the viability of the deal:

“This is very good news for Trollhättan, very good news for Saab.”

And when he was asked whether GM would agree, Muller had answered:

“This is up for the buyers and General Motors to agree on, but I am very confident that that will be achieved.”

No word about warning the Chinese all along that this won’t work. Of course, this was on the Friday before the creditors meeting, where Saab received the stay of execution, based on the very good news.

Having been administered ample amounts of cold water all day, Saab finally issued a terse press release:

“Swedish Automobile N.V. (Swan) and Saab Automobile AB (Saab Automobile announce they have taken notice of a press statement issued by General Motors Company (General Motors) today regarding the proposed sale of all shares in Saab Automobile and Saab Great Britain Ltd. (Saab GB) to Pang Da Automobile Trade Company Ltd (Pang Da) and Youngman Automotive Group Company Ltd (Youngman). 

Swan and Saab Automobile acknowledge the position taken by General Motors and will now discuss with Pang Da and Youngman to see whether a structure can be agreed which is acceptable to all parties concerned.”

Or as Muller had said to TTELA: “It’s back to the drawing board again.”

What Muller seems to be drawing is the old plan of Youngman and Pangda taking a hair less than 50 percent in Saab, with Muller back in the driver’s seat. He thinks that will avoid the change of control problems a 100 percent sale caused. The problem is that the Chinese don’t want Saab, they want technology. The Chinese government has given a clear mandate to its industry to get as much technology as possible under Chinese control.

A control problem avoided at GM creates a control problem in China. No technology, no deal.

There simply are too many parties with diametric interests who have to say yes to this deal. Saying no or nothing is always easier.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

11 Comments on “Or Daily Saab: A Wale Of A Botched Sale...”

  • avatar

    Translation: we got our bailout money, screw everybody else

  • avatar

    Translation: why would we allow a competitor to buy mostly our technology and platforms for pennies on the dollar and let them use them to undercut us.

  • avatar

    No, I think it makes perfect sense, and I really wonder why this issue had not come up earlier. GM is in the business of making money, not making competition for itself. What company (no longer in bankruptcy) would want to set up another competitor with it’s current tech to go head to head with itself? And especially in a market with regulations like China’s?

    GM gave Saab its chance to do something on its own. Not much of a chance, but better than just nixing the brand. GM is doing better now and wouldn’t nor shouldn’t support something that would strain one of their best markets.

  • avatar
    Sammy B

    You know GM has been against any type of SAAB-China deal for a long time. They just wait until the eleventh hour to come out and say they’re against it….pull the rug out from under them at the last moment….keep SAAB twisting in the wind and basically kill any chance of a deal. [was that enough cliches?]

    It’s a good tactic to really put the screws to SAAB and effectively ensure NOBODY would get their (GM’s) technology on the cheap. If I was a huge SAAB fan, I’d be ticked, but the business side of my brain likes the approach

  • avatar
    Dave M.

    Translation: why would we allow a competitor to buy mostly our [taxpayer funded] technology and platforms for pennies on the dollar and let them use them to undercut us.

    Sorry, but any moral business argument GM could make was lost in 2009.

  • avatar

    How come Victor Muller came to the conclusion that it was meaningful to involve the Chinese in the first place? I just don’t get it – it’s looked like a pretty big cul-de-sac from day 1 to me, and it seems if he were actually serious about saving Saab he should have looked elsewhere for solutions (and if there weren’t any, he should have drawn the obvious conclusions from that).

    • 0 avatar

      Because he did not have any other option. He calls it “back to the drawing board”. Must be the euphemism of the year. He found out the hard way that he did not have much to negotiate… or to sell. In the back of his mind he already knew of course. The Chinese should have urged him to make a stopover in Detroit first before any deal was closed.

  • avatar

    Over at the shrine of the One True Saab they are spinning this like its a Muller masterplan. Their take on it is that this is
    “Muller only agreed to the 100% deal because he knew that it would fail and he is working away behind the scenes to get another deal on the table. The 100% deal was that nasty Mr Lofalks deal and he all he wants his to take Mr Mullers ball away. But don’t worry by the end of the week as super secret extra special deal will be revealed….. the moneys coming! the moneys coming!”

    My thoughts would be I wonder how the creditors and especially the courts feel about Muller getting the Re-Organisation extended on the basis of a deal that it would appear he knew at the time had no chance for success. In the UK, that would be sailing pretty close to the reef known as contempt of court.

    “The moneys coming! the moneys coming! Honest it is! Crossed fingers & everything! The moneys coming!”

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Superdessucke: Opposite direction of what needs to be done. Bring back the d’Elegance and Biarritz. This...
  • Superdessucke: Well, that’s eventually going to happen. China not taking dollars. But what does going to war...
  • dal20402: Obviously better for that but it didn’t come as a 335is :)
  • dal20402: If you ask the Taiwanese if they want to join the PRC, they will give you the loudest “NO”...
  • Lou_BC: LOL

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber