Japanese Auto Industry: We're Outta Here
Again and again, Japanese automakers had been warning that they cannot stomach the strong yen, and that it will eventually cost jobs. Today, the yen stood at 76.6 to the dollar, and Japanese carmakers are packing.
Mitsubishi originally wanted to sharply increase Japanese production to make up for lost volume due to the tsunami. The company now “suddenly halved its plan to hire about 800 temporary workers by the end of September, as the yen’s appreciation has been eating into the profitability of its exports to Europe,” says The Nikkei [sub]. Mitsubishi’s President Osamu Masuko told reporters in a press conference today:
“We are fighting to adjust ourselves to the currency’s levels. But these efforts sometimes get wiped out in a single day. Don’t you think there is a growing sense of futility?”
Mitsubishi tried to slash costs as much as possible by becoming leaner and by buying parts abroad. “But the room for reducing costs further is getting smaller,” said Masuko.
A few weeks ago, Nissan’s CEO Carlos Ghosn had warned that a Yen that is not going back to “normal” “will provoke a rethinking of our industrial strategy.”
Some of this rethinking became effective today.
As expected, Nissan announced today at the governor’s palace in Rio de Janeiro that it will plunk down 2.6 billion Brazilian reais ($1.5 billion) for a new plant in Resende, near the ports of Itaguai and Rio de Janeiro.. When completed 2014, the plant is expected to crank out 200,000 units per year.
Nissan plans to introduce 10 new models to Brazil before 2016.
With only approximately 25 percent of its worldwide capacity in Japan, Nissan should be the least affected of Japan’s majors.
“Just as Nissan has demonstrated in China, Russia and India, we are investing in the regions with the most potential for growth,” said Carlos Ghosn. And that’s not Japan.
Wmba on Oct 10, 2011
@dr olds Cavaliers made for Toyota to sell in Japan years ago. That was an utter disaster, from what I read in CAR magazine. A pathetic car designed in the early '80s, never updated like the Opel/Vauxhall was, sent to Japan to sell against well made domestic product. And GM amazed that the Japanese didn't buy them. Typical. GM so isolated that it never occurred to them that Cavaliers were crap, because they were too haughty to examine Japanese cars and see where they were better. According to GM, they were equivalent, when anyone could see the assembly quality was shoddy at best. Blind insolence which characterizes GM to this day. For some reason beyond the ken of mortal men, GM believes that the crap they make is superior to anything else, and they get belligerent when others disagree. GM sales in China. Still counting Wuling vans as if they were all GM, when they are the product of a JV. More delusion. Torquing fasteners on all imports to Japan? I call BS on this one. Sounds like an old wives tale. There is nothing magic in making and designing a car, and certainly nothing magic about GM. The only recent hits they have had are the Cruze and Camaro. Meanwhile, unfazed by anything logical, you defend GM to the skies. You've probably never owned a Japanese car, so don't have a clue about them, but are certain they must be worse than any GM, just because. You sit in the middle of the woods, unable and unwilling to see the trees, with your fingers in your ears so that nothing can intrude on your reverie, and rail at everything non GM. It's this kind of attitude that got GM into bankruptcy. Apparently that has been passed off as a mere hiccup in the history of glorious GM, that didn't really happen. No lessons learned, no humility felt, no let's just plow on straight ahead as if nothing bad happened. It was just a dream. And so I get to read your ridiculous defense of GM over and over and over and over and over again. I rate you as the number one fanboy for any brand. Amazing you are. A pity that which you defend and laud is entirely unworthy of your misplaced attempts to rewrite history. GM has learned nothing from bankruptcy. And neither, apparently, have you.
Doctor olds on Oct 10, 2011
@wmba- I didn't claim the Toyota Cavalier was a sales success, but I cite my direct dealings with the program, Toyota and the Japanese government to support my knowledge. As a matter of fact, one of GM's prime motivations for the NUMMI joint venture was to get inside, detailed understanding of Toyota's quality systems and allow performance benchmarking. You clearly have minimal understanding of how hard the car business actually is. I know where we (GM) started, and how we caught up. Not from journalists or other sideline chatterers, but from real hard data and working to improve product quality. I love and know the car business from more years experience than many commentors or journalists have even been alive. I don't knock the other companies and don't claim GM to be anywhere near perfect. I know what I know, and can see the myths and distortions among many commenter's ideas. btw- 2nd place VW gets 27% of their global sales volume from their Chinese joint ventures. GM gets a whoppingingly higher 28%. I am not one bit ashamed to bring some real truth to the ideas about the industry and GM in particular. I have never knocked the other companies. I agree that Toyota and Honda have built great quality cars and how they have driven everyone (except most of the Europeans) to much higher quality levels. wrt- Checking bolt torque: I remember that factoid from a study initiated by Ohio US Congresswoman, Marci Kaptur, whose district included the Jeep plant in Toledo. I have a very good memory and distinctly recall that a Jeep sold for $40k in Japan vs $30k here. That study was back in the '90's and I didn't surface in a quick google search. If not for non-tariff barriers, how do you explain the miniscule penetration of ALL foreign makers in Japan?
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- 2ACL What tickles me is that the Bronco looks the business with virtually none of the black plastic cladding many less capable crossovers use.
- IBx1 For all this time with the hellcat engine, everything they made was pathetic automatic scum save for the Challenger. A manual Durango, Grand Cherokee, Charger, 300C, et al would have been the real last gasp for driving enthusiasts. As it is, the party is long over.
- MaintenanceCosts The sweet spot of this generation isn't made anymore: the SRT 392. The Scat Pack is more or less filling the same space but it lacks a lot of the goodies, including SRT suspension, brakes, and seats. The Hellcat is too much and isn't available with a manual anymore.
- Arthur Dailey I am normally a fan of Exner's designs but by this time the front end on the Stutz like most of the rest of the vehicle is a laughable monstrosity of gauche. The interior finishes suit the rest of the vehicle. Corey please put this series out of its misery. This is one vehicle manufacturer best left on the scrap heap of history.
- Art Vandelay I always thought what my Challenger really needed was a convertible top to make it heavier and make visability worse.