Wild-Ass Rumor Of The Day: Lincoln Is Going To Be Just Fine

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

About a minute into this clip, the auto industry’s most ubiquitous reporter John McElroy reveals that he’s seen three future Lincoln concepts and insists that they

definitely signal that a big change is coming.

What he doesn’t say: what they look like or what the “big change” is… which is enough to make any inveterate skeptic wonder whether McElroy is shooting straight or if saying what he did was a condition of being shown the “future products.” What McElroy does reveal is that Lincoln now has

its own unique design studio located within Ford’s product development center in Dearborn Michigan, with its own unique design team. That has not been done in modern times.

Unfortunately, as Cadillac’s recent history proves, new design is just part of the successful luxury brand equation. Unique platforms are another. Strong marketing is another. Lincoln may be taking the first steps in the right direction, but it’s got a long, long way to go…

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 81 comments
  • Maxb49 Maxb49 on Aug 09, 2011

    I would like to purchase a beautiful new Lincoln. Not a Taurus. If Ford/Lincoln want to attract customers like me who buy luxury cars, Alan Mulally has to get it through his head that we don't want pay $$$ for a Ford Taurus with a Lincoln emblem. Cost cutting doesn't apply to building successful luxury cars. That's why they are called luxury cars. At the very least, let's see the MKS renamed Continental, redesign the body panels to not resemble a jelly bean, and drop in the 5.0 V8. If Ford can't do this, they need to get out of the luxury car business, because it ain't that hard.

  • Mr. Spacely Mr. Spacely on Aug 09, 2011

    For a while now it's seemed like the two easiest moves Lincoln could make to help the brand are: 1. New grill. Hell, take the most recent Mercury grill. It's far better looking than the current whale smile. 2. Ditch the "MK--" in favor of actual names that people don't trip over, confuse, and ultimately ignore. Do these two things, and then maybe think about a RWD coupe or sedan.

  • TrailerTrash TrailerTrash on Aug 09, 2011

    Ed... love your work and think you need a rest. You're cranking out to much stuff these days! Find a beach and chill out for awhile. Let somebody take some of the load off. I did think your remark "new design is just part of the successful luxury brand equation. Unique platforms are another" is a bit hard on Ford. I mean, really...what car manufacturer does not spread the same platform through out the line up? Hell, IF you do NOT, you're dead these days…or will be very soon. The real truth is that this is going to be the ONLY way to survive and just watch how sneakily and brilliantly the future shows this! Pretty soon you are going to see plants set up to make subtle changes to platforms, yet see really wonderfully individual looking models come rolling off the end of the lines. To many notes in Jazz killed it for me...and to many parts in the storeroom will kill the manufacturer. New slogan in manufacturing and design...keep it simple, stupid.

  • Maxb49 Maxb49 on Aug 10, 2011
    I did think your remark “new design is just part of the successful luxury brand equation. Unique platforms are another” is a bit hard on Ford. I mean, really…what car manufacturer does not spread the same platform through out the line up? I wouldn't do all that schilling for Ford unless they cut you a nice fat check. Seriously, why are you apologizing for their failure to build a true luxury car, or criticizing people who point out that Lincoln's cars aren't up to true luxury standards? What manufacturer does not spread the same platform throughout the lineup? The first category of makers is made up of companies that sell low end, average cars and build luxury cars as a separate brand. They do not use the same SINGLE platform from their low end cars to build their high end models. These include Toyota/Lexus, GM/Cadillac, and Nissan/Infiniti. The second category consists of luxury car makers which make primarily luxury cars, or luxury cars whose companies make lower end cars, which do not "spread the same platform throughout the lineup". These manufacturers include BMW, Cadillac, Mercedes Benz, Jaguar, Land Rover, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Audi, Bentley, and Lexus. Us luxury car buyers don't want the Lincoln Taurus, Lincoln Taurus Crossover, Lincoln Taurus wagon, or any godd***ed model of Taurus. Being an apologist for Ford isn't going to go over well with us. We have $$$, and we're going to spend that $$$ on beautiful wheeled yachts. We ain't paying for warmed over family sedans. Got it?
    • Faygo Faygo on Aug 10, 2011

      @Maxb49 : I think the original point which was trying to be made was that unique platforms are not a requirement for a successful luxury brand. you read to much into the "same platform" comment which TrailerTrash made. Audi's most popular models (A4/A6) have always been directly built on commong platforms shared with VW (and Skoda) models. The A8 is shared with Bentley and the Phaeton. The Q7 = Touareg = Cayenne. A1/A2 (is there still an A2 ? I lose track)/A3 are directly VWs. VAG builds a sh!tton of things off the Golf platform and it's one of the reasons they are profitable. Toyota doesn't have a reason (in the US, the still sell Toyota-branded big RWD cars in the JDM) to sell anything based on their RWD platforms. Lexus' most popular models (ES, RX) are different flavors of Camry. The GX is a tarted up Land Cruiser. Other than the largest something-L-whatever, Acuras have always been nicer versions of Hondas, in some cases (TSX) those which aren't sold here in the US for whatever reason. Nissan does a good job of differentiating Infiniti with only RWD products and effectively builds their full range on a common platform, albeit in slightly different sizes. Cadillac has what seems to be an appropriate mix of shared and unique vehicles - time will tell whether they are able to gain market share with the ATS and especially whether the FWD-based XTS is able to cast an appropriate halo over the brand. some would argue that being tied to FWD design proportions will mean it will never be able to completely look the part. BMW and Mercedes have been able to thrive with only RWD-based upmarket products - however, both are moving down-market and will have FWD-based offerings soon. the next gen of larger Minis will surely share a platform with the bottom of the BMW range. Smart and an A-class will probably do the same. having a platform which may be limited to your luxury brand through simple economics (there isn't a lot of market for a VW-branded supercar based on the Gallardo/R8 platform, same as no reason to build RWD Camrys) makes sense, depending on circumstances it may or may not be possible for everyone. Platform sharing is a fact of life and there's nothing inherently wrong with it, if executed well. as in any situation, execution is what matters, not just paying lip service to whatever the latest "best strategy" is. Lincoln has quite a ways to go to be competitive, but the right moves seem to being made - time will tell how it turns out.

Next