The Auto Industry's Biggest Political Contributors Of The Midterm Election

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: November 10th, 2010

the auto industry s biggest political contributors of the midterm election

With news reports filtering in about an industry-mounted offensives against the Motor Vehicle Safety Act and proposed increases to CAFE standards, we thought we’d take a look at how much the industry spent in the recent midterm election cycle. According to Opensecrets.org, the chart above shows the biggest spenders in “Automotive,” and industry sector that includes OEMs, suppliers, rental companies and just about anything else related to four-wheeled motorized transport. Charged up by the bailout-era dealer cull, it’s not surprising that NADA took the top spot, and with a hotly-contested Korea free trade agreement under negotiation, the AFIT PAC is a logical number two. But Enterprise beating out Ford? Didn’t see that one coming. Still, the contributor breakdown for the “Auto Manufacturer” sector is even more interesting…

The third-biggest OEM manufacturer is the Colorado-based manufacturer of a delivery van that it’s been shopping to the military. Number four is perhaps the most interesting: HK Motors is the Alabama-based prospective manufacturer of mysterious hybrid vehicles run by former Brilliance Chairman Yung Yueng. It’s also a Visa farm which uses the State Department’s EB-5 program… a scheme that closely resembles a venture being launched by Brilliance’s former CEO. And it outspent Chrysler in the latest election.

Still, the big lesson from these numbers is that the entire auto industry is spending way less on campaign contributions than in years past. No surprises there: the automakers have been cutting back everywhere for the last several years. But then campaign contributions are also just one part of the equation: lobbying on Capitol Hill is often a more effective tool for influencing policy. Below is a list of the top automaker lobbying spenders of 2010.

#Congress #Government #Industry

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 25 comments

Jacob_coulter on Nov 10, 2010

You left out the major contributor that gave more than all these organization combined--the UAW. Around $8.5 million in 2010 alone, and ALL to Democrats and Left-leaning causes. That doesn't count what the members individually contributed either. The UAW was THE reason for the auto bailouts. The rest of these numbers are chickenfeed. It was always about filling political coffers.

Like Reply
- Windswords on Nov 11, 2010
  
  When you think about it, the UAW is just like a business in this case looking out for it's own self interest. They should be added to the chart.
  
  Like
Windswords on Nov 11, 2010

I was surprised to see my old employer JM Family Enterprises so high on the list. They are better known as Southeast Toyota Distributors. The founder Jim Moran was a big time democrat. After he died the company was turned over to some management group. When I was working there they ran an ad that showed a smiling mouth of pearly white teeth, except that one tooth was gold plated and had the Toyota sombrero painted on it. I suppose the persons mouth in the ad was black (I never saw the ad and I don't know what the copy was) because Jessie Jackson went ballistic on Southeast Toyota and did his usual race pimping. Somehow the ad was racist. Unfortunately JM capitulated to his complaints, apologized profusely, promised to never do it again, and committed to lots more diversity training (on top of what we already had). Somehow I don't think any of that was as important to Jessie as the big fat contribution that was given to his organization.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?