The Auto Industry's Biggest Political Contributors Of The Midterm Election
With news reports filtering in about an industry-mounted offensives against the Motor Vehicle Safety Act and proposed increases to CAFE standards, we thought we’d take a look at how much the industry spent in the recent midterm election cycle. According to Opensecrets.org, the chart above shows the biggest spenders in “Automotive,” and industry sector that includes OEMs, suppliers, rental companies and just about anything else related to four-wheeled motorized transport. Charged up by the bailout-era dealer cull, it’s not surprising that NADA took the top spot, and with a hotly-contested Korea free trade agreement under negotiation, the AFIT PAC is a logical number two. But Enterprise beating out Ford? Didn’t see that one coming. Still, the contributor breakdown for the “Auto Manufacturer” sector is even more interesting…
The third-biggest OEM manufacturer is the Colorado-based manufacturer of a delivery van that it’s been shopping to the military. Number four is perhaps the most interesting: HK Motors is the Alabama-based prospective manufacturer of mysterious hybrid vehicles run by former Brilliance Chairman Yung Yueng. It’s also a Visa farm which uses the State Department’s EB-5 program… a scheme that closely resembles a venture being launched by Brilliance’s former CEO. And it outspent Chrysler in the latest election.
Still, the big lesson from these numbers is that the entire auto industry is spending way less on campaign contributions than in years past. No surprises there: the automakers have been cutting back everywhere for the last several years. But then campaign contributions are also just one part of the equation: lobbying on Capitol Hill is often a more effective tool for influencing policy. Below is a list of the top automaker lobbying spenders of 2010.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- ToolGuy Question: F-150 FP700 ( Bronze or Black) supercharger kit is legal in 50 states, while the Mustang supercharger kit is banned in California -- why??
- Scott "It may not be the ideal hauler to take the clan cross-country to Wally World considering range anxiety "Range Anxiety is a chosen term that conceals as much as it discloses. You don't care about range that much if you can recharge quickly and current BV's (battery vehicles) can't, no matter how good the chargers are. From what I've been reading it is likely that within 5 years there will be batteries in cars, most likely Tesla's, that can charge fast enough with no harm to the batteries to satisfy all of us with no need to increase range beyond a real world 300-ish miles.And that's when I buy one.
- Charles I had one and loved it . Seated 7 people . Easy to park , great van
- Jay Mason Your outdoor space will get better every year with a pergola. A horizontal, pole-supported framework for climbing plants is called a pergola. It creates a closed off area. pergola builder denton texas by Denton Custom Decks provide cover for outdoor gatherings. They would be more than happy to assist you with the pergola's framework.
- Alan I would think Ford would beef up the drive line considering the torque increase, horse power isn't a factor here. I looked at a Harrop supercharger for my vehicle. Harrop offered two stages of performance. The first was a paltry 100hp to the wheels (12 000AUD)and the second was 250hp to the wheels ($20 000 (engine didn't rev harder so torque was significantly increased)). The Stage One had no drive line changes, but the Stage Two had drive line modifications. My vehicle weighs roughly the same as a full size pickup and the 400'ish hp I have is sufficient, I had little use for another 100 let alone 250hp. I couldn't see much difference in the actual supercharger setup other than a ratio change for the drive of the supercharger, so that extra $8 000 went into the drive line.
You left out the major contributor that gave more than all these organization combined--the UAW. Around $8.5 million in 2010 alone, and ALL to Democrats and Left-leaning causes. That doesn't count what the members individually contributed either. The UAW was THE reason for the auto bailouts. The rest of these numbers are chickenfeed. It was always about filling political coffers.
I was surprised to see my old employer JM Family Enterprises so high on the list. They are better known as Southeast Toyota Distributors. The founder Jim Moran was a big time democrat. After he died the company was turned over to some management group. When I was working there they ran an ad that showed a smiling mouth of pearly white teeth, except that one tooth was gold plated and had the Toyota sombrero painted on it. I suppose the persons mouth in the ad was black (I never saw the ad and I don't know what the copy was) because Jessie Jackson went ballistic on Southeast Toyota and did his usual race pimping. Somehow the ad was racist. Unfortunately JM capitulated to his complaints, apologized profusely, promised to never do it again, and committed to lots more diversity training (on top of what we already had). Somehow I don't think any of that was as important to Jessie as the big fat contribution that was given to his organization.