Carmageddon's Real Victim: Auto R&D Down $12b in 2009

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The car business has endured a lot of bad news over the last several years, as finance-fueled sales crashed with the credit market, and automakers around the world scrambled for government aid. The so-called “Carmageddon” has touched everyone even remotely involved with the automotive industry, not to mention everyone who pays taxes, but from a strictly consumer perspective, it hasn’t been all bad. Certainly the deals have been good, as programs like Cash For Clunkers and the wind-down of several brands have helped savvy shoppers find some of the best deals in a long time. So here’s the reality check: according to Booz & Co.’s Global Innovation 1000 study, spending on research and development by the auto sector was down $12b last year. That’s $12b that should have been spent making your car faster, smarter, safer, cleaner, better that’s no longer being spent. Still feeling untouched?

And yes, this is a problem that’s unique to the auto industry. As one of the report’s authors tells Wards

If you look at the data, (auto makers) cut R&D to sustain their business models. As a percentage of their total revenue, it’s not just the largest dollar amount cut but also the largest percentage reduction of any industry we followed.

And he’s not kidding. In 2008, Toyota was the top R&D-spending company in the world. After a billion and a half dollars in cuts, they’re number four [memo to Toyota, update the file]. In fact, Volkswagen was the only major automaker to not reduce R&D spending last year, as most of the majors shed at least a billion dollars trying to keep their heads above water. It would be premature to predict the onset of 1970s-style automotive malaise based on one year of cuts alone, but unless all those missing billions were being wasted, their absence will be felt in new cars at some point.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 12 comments
  • Fusion Fusion on Nov 09, 2010

    Anybody know how these numbers are derived / calculated? I only checked for Volkswagen Group, but their annual financial report for 2009 states 5.429 Million € in "Research and Development cost recognized in the income statement" - which would translate to ~7,2 billion dollars (todays exchange rate).

    • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Nov 09, 2010

      On 12/31/09, the EUR bought 1.4333 USD (not too far from what it buys today.) Which translates into exactly 7.78 billion USD. In the words of a - sadly deceased - old school VW board member whom I remember fondly: "Never trust a statistic unless you forged it yourself." Next to saving on advertising, saving on R&D is a great and quick fix to make your books look better. Both will bite you in the butt a few years later. R&D savings have a much bigger bite.

  • John Horner John Horner on Nov 09, 2010

    " ... but unless all those missing billions were being wasted, .... "

    The law of diminishing returns certainly applies to R&D spending by the big companies. There is also the issue of making good use of global resources. Ford, for example, was duplicating efforts across a host of brands, platforms and regional development centers without getting a corresponding product return for all those billions being spent. Even post cuts, Ford spent almost $5B on R&D in 2009. That is a lot of money.

    Sometimes having too much money flowing through the labs and design studios can be just as bad as having too little.

  • Ajla Using an EV for going to landfill or parking at the bad shopping mall or taking a trip to Sex Cauldron. Then the legacy engines get saved for the driving I want to do. 🤔
  • SaulTigh Unless we start building nuclear plants and beefing up the grid, this drive to electrification (and not just cars) will be the destruction of modern society. I hope you love rolling blackouts like the US was some third world failed state. You don't support 8 billion people on this planet without abundant and relatively cheap energy.So no, I don't want an electric car, even if it's cheap.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Lou_BCone of many cars I sold when I got commissioned into the army. 1964 Dodge D100 with slant six and 3 on the tree, 1973 Plymouth Duster with slant six, 1974 dodge dart custom with a 318. 1990 Bronco 5.0 which was our snowboard rig for Wa state and Whistler/Blackcomb BC. Now :my trail rigs are a 1985 Toyota FJ60 Land cruiser and 86 Suzuki Samurai.
  • RHD They are going to crash and burn like Country Garden and Evergrande (the Chinese property behemoths) if they don't fix their problems post-haste.
  • Golden2husky The biggest hurdle for us would be the lack of a good charging network for road tripping as we are at the point in our lives that we will be traveling quite a bit. I'd rather pay more for longer range so the cheaper models would probably not make the cut. Improve the charging infrastructure and I'm certainly going to give one a try. This is more important that a lowish entry price IMHO.
Next