Ask The Best And Brightest: Gas Tax?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

With the federal deficit balooning out of control, President Obama’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform has publicized its preliminary proposals, and goodness are there a lot of them. But only one of the commission’s proposals gets to the heart of this nation’s automotive future: a proposal to increase America’s gas tax. Federal fuel taxes currently stand at 18.4 cents a gallon for gasoline and 24.4 cents for diesel fuel, but the commission has proposed a 15 cent per gallon increase, to take effect starting in 2013.

According to CNN

Gas taxes would rise by one cent every three months beginning in January 2013, until the 15 cent increase has been reached… The proposal calls for the funds to be “dedicated toward fully funding the transportation trust funds and therefore eliminating the need for further general fund bailouts.”

It’s not immediately clear how much money this tax increase might raise, but the overall proposal would cut as much as $4 trillion from the federal debt. And with transportation trust funds draining the general fund, a gas tax hike has been tossed around for some time. And as unpopular as tax increases are, better a gas tax than Transportation Secretary Ray LaHoods preferred alternative: a pay-per-mile scheme that would require GPS tracking of every vehicle in America. Besides, a gas tax increase will make those ramped-up CAFE standards far less onerous by shifting market demand towards more-efficient vehicles. Congress-watchers reckon that a gas tax hike is unlikely to happen in the recently-elected, more-conservative congress. Down the road, though, it’s hard to see this proposal not coming back up at some point.

Would you support a gas tax hike? Would a 15 cent increase in the price of gas have a real impact on your lifestyle? Would it change your car-buying decisions? Or should the gas tax be a political sacred cow?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 113 comments
  • GoBears GoBears on Nov 13, 2010

    One idea wouldbe to have a variable gasoline tax that kicks in when gasoline prices fall below some predetermined floor to make up the difference between the gasoline price and the floor. At least in this way, car manufacturers can have some better certainty that consumer demand for fuel efficiency in cars won't swing wildly with gasoline prices. Note that a gasoline tax can be designed to decrease demand for gasoline but be revenue neutral as the same time (not the latter is something is necessarily desirable by the government right now). This can be done by setting up the gasoline tax as a feebate. Under such a system, gasoline is taxed per gallon at the pump. The 'feebate' aspect is that the tax gets distributed back to taxpayers at the end of the year, says as part of a Federal income tax rebate. However, the rebate for a family is calculated on the basis some national average use of gasoline per per adult, times the number of adults in the family. In this way, people who drive fuel efficient cars and drive less miles, or don't even have cars, would actually pay a net negative fuel tax, and the reverse would more gasoline than average. The higher the tax at the pump, the greater the incentive to drive less miles and/or drive more efficient vehicles. Of course, such a system would be relatively complex to implement with regards to details of calculating average fuel use, etc. Persumably, some portion of fuel tax would still need to be retained by the government for the usual purposes.

  • Acubra Acubra on Nov 14, 2010

    And so all the sheep in the heard bleat in unison - Fleece, fleece us more, MASTER! Your gov will spend the additional taxes on whatever it damn pleases and will come demanding more. America's taken down the USSR but the latter has the last laugh - as "USA" is quickly progressing into "USSA"...

  • Analoggrotto Does anyone seriously listen to this?
  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Next