Curbside Classic: 1972 BMW 2002 Tii – The Second Most Influential Modern Car In America

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer
curbside classic 1972 bmw 2002 tii the second most influential modern car in

There’s a wise old saying that warns not to propose marriage to a woman until you’ve met her mother. What if potential MIL is out of the country for an extended period, and you’re in a hurry? You could do what I did in 1977: look in the garage to see what she drives. There I found a BMW 2002 stashed securely away. And it wasn’t an automatic either. It’s all I needed to know: “Stephanie, will you marry me?”

If the 1979 Firebird Trans Am was a living dinosaur, than what was the little mammalian creature scurrying about underfoot that would eventually take its place, and revolutionize the performance car segment? The answer is indisputably the BMW 2002.

In the US, the original Honda Civic revolutionized the small car, and the 1976 Accord was the most influential modern car, defining the ubiquitous FWD configuration and capabilities for their respective classes. And the little boxy BMW joins them on the podium, creating and defining a class that has largely replaced the muscle cars of yore. And in the process, it no less than vaulted its maker from relative obscurity to the top of the premium car segment? Who in 1966 would have thunk that would happen? Absolutely nobody.

BMW was just barely coming off life support, thanks to the “Neue Klasse” cars that arrived a couple of years earlier. The 1500/1800/2000 sedans ( CC here) were leading edge in their configuration, suspension and engine, but no one will accuse them of being beautiful. They were a tad too Germanic: tall, boxy, and a bit dowdy. Just the ticket for Germans who wanted a sporty sedan to haul the whole family with. But that’s not where the action was in the US market; those early four door BMWs were modest sellers here.

BMW’s brilliant move was to spin off a slightly smaller two-door variant, the 1600-02, sometimes referred to as the 1602. And they engaged Michelotti to make the styling a bit less home-baked. Even with all of 85hp (I’m going to use the Euro DIN hp numbers throughout this article because they more closely correspond to today’s SAE net horsepower rating), the lightweight (2000lb) 1600 was a sprightly performer for the times. But it was its fully independent suspension that really made it stand out in the crowd, as well as its all-round balance and poise. Alfa Romeo, whose hot little sedans had defined and practically owned this segment, was one-upped. The 1600 co-opted the lusty sportiness of the Giulia, but with Teutonic engineering and build quality.

The supple yet well controlled suspension was perhaps the single most defining aspect of the 1600/2002. Yes, there were other hot little European sedans to be had, such as the Ford Cortina GT, the Alfas, the Opel Kadett GT 1900, and the Fiat 124, among others. And import drivers had come to appreciate the remarkable capabilities (and quirks) of Mercedes’ and VW’s rear swing axles. But neither of them targeted the sporty sedan market. With the exception of the similarly irs equipped (but less sporty) Peugeot 504, Americans for the most part were uninitiated with its benefits in a sporty sedan. Certainly, the domestics did nothing to further that, except for the Corvair. But rear-engined cars, and their unique little vices were a class unto themselves.

But the little BMW 1600 was the mold from which all modern RWD cars have sprung, and once one experienced its joys, very few if ever went back to chattering, shuddering, stiffly-sprung live rear axles. Detroit’s only formula of how to make cars handle better was with stiffer springs and shocks. Great for a perfectly smooth road or the track; wretched on a bumpy winding road. The BMW broke the pony cars’ thrall with superb handling along with a ride that didn’t break it’s drivers’ backs.

I had a religious experience at the hands of a priest in seventh grade (no, not that kind). A new young priest arrived at Immaculate Contraception in 1966, driving the first 1600 in Towson. As the youngest cleric on the totem pole, he got to oversee the CYO (youth organization). No hanky-panky though; he was cool, bright, and car nut. I got to ride with him to a retreat way out in Northern Baltimore County, and he drove like the very devil himself. I had never experienced someone driving the snot out of a car like this; it was a divine revelation.

The little 1600 had to be spanked hard to fly, but in the right hands it did, although it’s chassis was capable of much more. BMW was on it. Soon Europeans were relishing the 1600 Ti, a juiced up little bomb, and a foreshadowing of what VW did with its original Euro-only GTI some years later.

But the 1600 Ti’s timing was too advanced, literally, for the US. Smog controls nixed it, but BMW’s brilliant US distributor, Max Hoffman, had the solution: imitate the Americans. Forget high-winding little engines; just drop the bigger 2 liter engine out of the 2000 sedan in the 1600. It was cheaper to build than the 1600Ti, and Americans twist more towards torque than absolute horsepower. The 2002 was conceived in America, and then conquered it.

One hundred horsepower; that’s what the 2002 legend was made with. Later versions undoubtedly had even less. But in 1970 it was good enough for a 9.6 second run from zero to sixty ( C/D), the same as a 1975 Trans Am 400. And the bigger four’s torque forgave lazy shifting: this was not a high-strung mill, and peaked at 5800 rpm. Everyone raved about it, and Stephanie’s brother convinced their Mom to spend a major chunk of a small inheritance on hers. This despite the fact she was a single working mom with four kids. Someone had their priorities…on second thought, maybe the 2002 in the garage should have given me pause.

I didn’t get a lot of seat time in her car, but a brisk late-night dash up 395 to Mammoth Mountain was more than enough to leave indelible impressions. The several times I had to rescue MIL because her BMW had overheated in LA traffic are also memorable. The 2002 was not without its faults, overheating being the worst of them. The cramped rear seat was pretty high on the list: this is a tiny car for today’s standards, but the accommodations for the driver were excellent: fine seats, tasteful and high-quality interior appointments compared to Detroit’s cheesy seventies’ bordello-look, and unparalleled visibility. The 2002 was truly the antithesis of the pony cars (and all new cars) when it comes to the drivers position and the unobstructed view out: it’s like riding in a glass box.

The BMW mothership may not have initiated the move to drop the 2 L into the 1600, but they wasted no time in also making the ti version from the sedan and coupe available too. Also banned from the US because of its polluting ways, the 2002 ti sported 120 horses. And it quickly became the GTO of Europe. The final trick was fuel injection, a Kugelfischer unit, that bought power to 130 hp, and made it EPA compliant. Arriving in 1971, the 2002Tii instantly became the hot setup for those in the know. Wider wheels, upgraded suspension, bigger tires, and a hair-trigger response from the gas pedal. Stats don’t really do justice to these cars, but the 2002 Tii clicked of the run to sixty in 8.20 seconds and topped out at an honest 120 mph. Not bad for a brick with a glass box on top of it.

The 2002s initiated a whole generation of drivers in the joys of moderate oversteer. Not the terminal kind, when an ass-heavy rear-engined car no longer can fight the law centrifugal force. The 2002 started out with mild under steer, but transitioned into a happy ass-out attitude that could be sustained and controlled with the throttle, and not something to be feared or vanquished like in a VW.

I could write about the 2002 all day; it was the biggest single boon bestowed on eager drivers in modern history. Evolution has favored the BMW, as has the cachet the BMW name earned thanks so much to the 2002. And now its successor, hardly recognizable as a direct descendant, outsells all of the pony cars and spawned a host of imitators. Darwin would understand.

More Curbside Classics Here

Join the conversation
2 of 60 comments
  • Clutchless Clutchless on Oct 04, 2010

    I had two of these back in college, a used 1971 in the same color as above purchased for $2100 in 1972. It was the same price as a new Datsun 510. I would have bought the Datsun if any sedans were still available, but only wagons with a live axle were still at local dealers. It was a great car for a year. Myself and a college buddy almost broke the land speed record driving from Washington, DC to Albuquerque in 27 hours in January 1973. Then it blew a thermostat and overheated in Tenn on the way back to VA from NM the next spring. After getting major engine repairs, since my car knowledge was none back then, the mechanic advised selling it. I replaced it with an even worse 1968 2002, one of the first shipped here. I installed racing anti sway bars and it was like driving a slot car. It was my beginning education in auto repair! Then it seized the engine at 100,300 miles, again in TN! Got a junkyard engine with 30,000 miles for $800 installed, then had the bad luck to be rear ended by a drunk 6 months later. My 2008 Mini Cooper S is the closest to driving those cars, but I still think about buying another, eyeing a 1973 tii with the 5 speed conversion.

  • Movieprodw Movieprodw on Jan 02, 2015

    I have owned 2 2002s and am working on a third. They are a blast to drive and currently an appreciating hobby. I have made an average of 400% off each one I sold! Here is a great site to search for them.

  • Lorenzo In Massachusetts, they used to require an inspection every 6 months, checking your brake lights, turn signals, horn, and headlight alignment, for two bucks.Now I get an "inspection" every two years in California, and all they check is the smog. MAYBE they notice the tire tread, squeaky brakes, or steering when they drive it into the bay, but all they check is the smog equipment and tailpipe emissions.For all they would know, the headlights, horn, and turn signals might not work, and the car has a "speed wobble" at 45 mph. AFAIK, they don't even check EVs.
  • Not Tire shop mechanic tugging on my wheel after I complained of grinding noise didn’t catch that the ball joint was failing. Subsequently failed to prevent the catastrophic failure of the ball joint and separation of the steering knuckle from the car! I’ve never lived in a state that required annual inspection, but can’t say that having the requirement has any bearing on improving safety given my experience with mechanics…
  • Mike978 Wow 700 days even with the recent car shortages.
  • Lorenzo The other automakers are putting silly horsepower into the few RWD vehicles they have, just as Stellantis is about to kill off the most appropriate vehicles for that much horsepower. Somehow, I get the impression the OTHER Carlos, Tavares, not Ghosn, doesn't have a firm grasp of the American market.
  • UncleAL ...Oh, did I forget ? My Dodge Challenger gets 50% more gas mileage and 200% more fun !