More California Cities Keep, Dump Red Light Cameras
Three California city councils debated whether to keep or discard red light cameras last week. In Loma Linda officials on Tuesday voted to drop automated enforcement while South San Francisco officials voted to keep it on Wednesday. The debates followed in the wake of a decision by the city of San Carlos last Monday to drop cameras after the duration of the yellow light at the camera-enforced intersection was extended by one second, eliminating the system’s profitability.
San Carlos Mayor Randy Royce wrote to the South San Francisco council urging them not to renew their automated ticketing contract with American Traffic Solutions (ATS).
“Our city council is disappointed with the representations made by Redflex and our approved motion included direction to staff to go back to the vendor and propose termination of the three-year contract immediately,” Royce wrote. “My personal recommendations as learned from this experience are that 1) don’t assume that red light cameras improve safety, 2) recognize that people are generally smarter than cameras so expect a significant reduction in citations over time, and 3) never commit to a lease term longer than your cell-phone provider.”
The South San Francisco council ignored the advice and approved a long-term contract extension. Vice Mayor Kevin Mullin argued that although the city’s cameras have not been in operation long enough to judge their effectiveness, he trusted the results of other cities that claimed accidents were reduced after camera installation. About a dozen ordinary citizens showed up to disagree while three testified in favor of keeping the devices. The most common complaint centered around the seemingly random flashing from the camera.
“The lights are very bright and on a few occasions when I was turning right, the light was so bright my vision was impaired for a couple of seconds,” motorist Diane Fitzgibbon said. “I wonder if the police department considers this safe. As you know it only takes a few seconds for an accident to occur.”
Despite being discouraged from doing so by the mayor, the audience applauded residents who opposed cameras. More than one resident suggested this is a matter better decided by the people.
“I’d love to see American Traffic Solutions’ business plan,” motorist Jim Lawless told the city council. “Going around the country and getting places to put in things saying, ‘no installation cost, no startup fees, turnkey operation.’ They’re selling it to you. But the one thing they haven’t done in terms of environmental impact — you got an approval from CalTrans according to this report — but you didn’t get the approval of the citizens of South San Francisco…. You people stop voting on this and let us vote on it, because I don’t think the people of South San Francisco want it.”
Although the city began issuing tickets in August 2009, most citations have been refunded due to legal problems with the council’s action. According to police data, 95 percent of citations went to people who made slow right-hand turns at red lights. Mayor Mark Addiego was convinced that after all of the trouble the program should finally be canceled.
“I’m not OK taking this much money out of the economy at this time,” Addiego said. “These initial five months, $1.5 million — $300,000 a month. That’s great revenue, but it’s like ill-gotten gains. Someone spoke this evening about the populace, the citizenry, losing respect for the police. I’m afraid that’s happening to a degree. There’s a lot of passion in this, and I don’t want that directed at my police department. It’s not worth it.”
In the end, however, only Councilman Pedro Gonzalez supported Addiego in seeking to terminate the contract. The council voted 3-2 for an extension and the program will resume ticketing on May 15.
In Loma Linda, the council agreed that there was a consensus in the community to drop red light camera ticketing. The city will send a letter to Redflex Traffic Systems of Australia “at the earliest time” informing them that the city will not renew its contract in December. Loma Linda saw a 92 percent drop in violations after it lengthened the duration of yellow lights by one second.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Inside Looking Out You should care. With GM will die America. All signs are there. How about the Arsenal of Democracy? Toyota?
- DenverMike What else did anyone think, when GM was losing tens of billions a year, year after year?
- Bill Wade GM says they're killing Android Auto and Apple Carplay. Any company that makes decisions like that is doomed to die.
- Jeff S I don't believe gm will die but that it will continue to shrink in product and market share and it will probably be acquired by a foreign manufacturer. I doubt gm lacks funds as it did in 2008 and that they have more than enough cash at hand but gm will not expand as it did in the past and the emphasis is more on profitability and cutting costs to the bone. Making gm a more attractive takeover target and cut costs at the expense of more desirable and reliable products. At the time of Farago's article I was in favor of the Government bailout more to save jobs and suppliers but today I would not be in favor of the bailout. My opinions on gm have changed since 2008 and 2009 and now I really don't care if gm survives or not.
- Kwik_Shift I was a GM fan boy until it ended in 2013 when I traded in my Avalanche to go over to Nissan.
"Loma Linda saw a 92 percent drop in violations after it lengthened the duration of yellow lights by one second." The above statement is an eye opener. Does anyone know if the red light camera/speed camera detector from Escort works well?