By on December 8, 2010

Red light cameras are nowhere near as popular as they once were with Golden State municipalities. Loma Linda and Whittier became the most recent examples of California cities unplugging their automated ticketing machines after noting that the devices both failed to reduce accidents and generate the promised amounts of revenue.

In 2005, Loma Linda allowed Redflex Traffic Systems to mail tickets, now nearly $500 each, to motorists who primarily made slow, rolling right-hand turns on red. In the second year of the program, the city lengthened the duration of the yellow light at the enforced intersection. As a result, straight-through violations — and profit — plunged. This convinced council members that the program was not worth keeping, but Redflex prevented the city from canceling the contract by threatening to the city to pay for three years’ worth of “losses” accumulated since the signal timing change. The Australian company then took steps to conceal the long-term effect of longer yellow on straight-through citations.

“Redflex held the deficit over our heads since the contract stated that they would forgive the deficit only at the end of the term,” Mayor Rhodes Rigsby told TheNewspaper. “Redflex apparently stopped separating the statistics for straights, lefts and rights to prevent me from further reporting of their perfidious business model.”

Extended yellow timing does not change the number of tickets for the right-hand turns that made up 95 percent of tickets by program’s end. The Loma Linda council’s most vocal camera critic hopes the city’s experience will encourage other cities to drop their photo enforcement programs.

“These cameras need to be taken down everywhere,” Councilman Ovi Popescu told TheNewspaper. “They are used to enrich governments and pay for out of control spending on pensions and salaries here in California. I feel sorry for the residents of many other communities such as Los Angeles and San Bernardino who will suffer at the hands of a government that is only getting bigger and more determined to take your money all under the guise of improving safety.”

Residents in Whittier will no longer see cameras flashing after officials admitted the cameras neither reduced accidents nor generated revenue. The city last month allowed its contract to expire, forcing American Traffic Solutions to remove its equipment.

Throughout the state, the same complaints have been heard throughout the year. In January, Moreno Valley dropped cameras. San Carlos canceled in April. Union City dumped cameras in June. Yucaipa and Costa Mesa ended automated ticketing in July. In November, 73 percent of Anaheim residents voted to ban cameras, although they had not been installed.

In the past, Cupertino, Compton, El Monte, Fairfield, Fresno, Irvine, Maywood, Paramount, Redlands, Roseville, San Jose (photo radar), Santa Rosa, and Upland have rejected their automated ticketing programs.

[Courtesy:Thenewspaper.com]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

6 Comments on “Two More California Cities Reject Red Light Cameras...”


  • avatar
    ash78

    This still begs the question (that’s right, pedants, I’m using that phrase in the accepted colloquial sense instead of the traditional purist sense!):
     
    If it hadn’t reduced accidents, but HAD increased revenue, would they still be taking them down?
     
    Rolling right turns are crap. It’s illegal, but I still think right-on-red should be changed to be considered more like a Yield at intersections with good visibility.

    • 0 avatar

      Sooth.

      When the speed cameras on the interstates here in Arizona came down, the reasoning publicized was almost verbatim. “Failed to reduce accidents and generate the promised amounts of revenue.”

      Simply: These cameras go up purely for revenue generation.

  • avatar
    FleetofWheel

    It would be interesting to have a town propose to ATS that they will allow red light cameras to be installed but only if the algorithm is altered to pay every scanned plate with a 5 cent reward for each car that does NOT violate that intersection per visit (lump sum to be payed annually to each registered car).
     
    If ATS really believes in a safety enhancing system using financial sticks and carrots, then they ought to get on board and not be afraid that a highly compliant town of motorists would cost them dearly in payouts.

    • 0 avatar

      Not sure why someone would advocate paying people for obeying the law.  Either way, in many communities red light running is a real problem. And contrary to the above post, more and more communities everyday are turning to them to help address it.  

      http://www.wreg.com/news/wreg-red-light-runners-story,0,7203449.story

    • 0 avatar
      Steve65

      The solution to red light running is to fix the intersection(s). Not the installation of revenue roots.

    • 0 avatar
      CarPerson

      @cterrito
      “…in many communities red light running is a real problem.”

      Can you be more specific which communities? What information do you have regarding the city NOT setting the yellows to as short as 2.7s?  What is known about the city identifying the problem intersection, adding 5s to the green and re-setting the yellow to not less than 4.5s?
       
      While you are checking that out, check thenewspaper, which is reporting a dozen CA cities have dumped the cameras after revenue plunged when the yellows were normalized. In the end, 93% of the tickets were for a non-detected full stop prior to a lawful right-turn-on-red without any safety implication. Even jacking some up to $500 failed to bring in the amount of money the camera company demanded.
       
      The State of Georgia smelled a rat in the ITE Keller and Fullerton yellow light formula and mandated adding one full second. At last count 80% of the cameras were removed after the revenue plunged.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • ttacgreg: That’s the beauty of the hybrid system. In sub highway speeds, particularly in city stop and go...
  • ttacgreg: FWIW my 31 year old 1990 Plymouth Laser turbo is still running just fine, it hasn’t grenaded just...
  • ttacgreg: That makes three of us. I am an Ace of Base kind of guy, and have always been fascinated with highly tuned...
  • dal20402: Early Leafs did have an inherently flawed battery design. Now, the value of the earliest ones generally...
  • dal20402: Cities are eventually going to ban ICE vehicles within their urban parts, less for climate reasons than...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber