California: Two More Cities Dump Red Light Cameras

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Red light cameras are becoming less popular among municipal leaders in California. On Monday, the Yucaipa city council voted unanimously to cancel its photo enforcement contract with Redflex Traffic Systems of Australia. The previous week, Costa Mesa officially pulled the plug on its automated ticketing machines.

The controversial cameras caused an increase in accidents in Costa Mesa, according to city data. In 2005, the California Supreme Court allowed an appellate division ruling to stand against Costa Mesa’s cameras. The appellate judge had found that Costa Mesa violated the state code by failing to provide 30-days notice for each intersection where the devices were used, as required by the law. It also found the city improperly allowed another agency to control and set signal timing ( view ruling).

Yucaipa’s problems were less dramatic. The city council silently swallowed a $198,000 bill from Redflex in order to get out from under the program that failed to meet revenue expectations since it signed a three-year contract with the Australian company in December 2007. The first citations were issued in April 2009.

“The program was not very productive in terms of paying for itself,” Public Works Director Bill Hemsley explained. “The anticipated revenue was a loss.”

The city blamed the San Bernardino County courts for having compassion on local residents whose per capita income is $18,949. Instead of attempting to collect the stiff, near $500 fine for mostly minor, technical violations all at once, the court offered installment plans that delayed full payment to the city. In other cases, the court slashed the payment due.

“Many citations were either forgiven or the fines were drastically reduced,” Hemsley said. “Fortunately there was a provision in the contract to revisit within a year the program. Staff did that… There was not a good solution found.”

By the time all installments are received, the city expects $155,000 in revenue. After paying Redflex $198,000, that represents a net loss of $43,000. The Australian company initially insisted on payment of $236,620.24 to cancel the contract but after negotiation agreed to offer a 22 percent discount to the city.

A number of other cities have dropped automated ticketing machines. In April, Loma Linda and San Carlos ended their red light camera programs. Moreno Valley gave Redflex its walking papers in January. Yucaipa’s cameras were unplugged on June 30. Costa Mesa’s were turned off July 22.

A copy of Hemsley’s memo to the Yucaipa city council is available in a 200k PDF file at the source link below.

Termination of Contract — Redflex Traffic Systems Inc (City of Yucaipa, California, 7/26/2010)

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Russycle Russycle on Aug 02, 2010

    I like the idea of red light cameras, I see way too many people blatantly running reds. But when corporations and municipalities treat them as cash cows instead of safety enhancements, they're a disaster. Time to pull the plug.

  • Pete Anthan Pete Anthan on Aug 02, 2010

    I don't like the idea of people running red lights and I'm not sure who does. Some idiot comes barreling through the intersection on his way to whatever idiot place he's going. That could be you and your family getting broadsided, or me and mine. I agree, though, that revenue-generating red light cameras are a complete money-grubbing disaster. So, what's the better solution? Running a red light is, after all, illegal not to mention insane. (You'll INVARIABLY get stuck at the next red light, meaning you gain nothing.) Now what?

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next