Li-ion Bubble Trouble Ahead; Volt Battery Chief Jumps In Too

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

Li-ion battery start ups have been the dot.coms of the last few years. And like that not-so little bubble, a report now warns of a brewing global overcapacity, and coming shakeout. Some sixty li-ion battery makers are in various stages of development and production, fueled by projected EV demand. GreenCarCongress reports:

a new report from Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, planned investments in lithium-ion manufacturing will result in significant overcapacity between 2014 and 2017 relative to the demand generated by that growth, especially in the US and in Japan.

As a consequence, Roland Berger forecasts, only six to eight global battery manufacturers will survive the next five to seven years. These are the findings of a new market survey conducted by Roland Berger Strategy Consultants titled “Powertrain 2020: Li-ion batteries – The next bubble ahead?”

Planned investments will thus result in significant overcapacity between 2014 and 2017, especially in the US and in Japan. Given the announced investments, capacity in 2015 will already reach 200% of the demand projected for 2016. In addition, not all investments have been announced; as-yet unknown investments by key players will lead to further overcapacity, and national subsidies will stimulate even more investments.

Those “as-yet unknown investments” has attracted one industry pioneer. GM’s Director of Global Battery Systems Denise Gray has announced her departure for an un-named new battery start-up in California. gm-volt.com‘s Lyle Dennis: “I would speculate it is possible she could be joining Stanford silicon nanowire battery expert Yi Cui in his start-up company, Amprius.”

The real challenge is to drive production costs down, and that takes large capital investment and economies of scale. According to the Roland Berger report: “€50-100 million for new cell chemistry, €350 million for a 100,000 unit plant.”

This creates a dilemma for the West and its governments, who are backing battery research and development.

Western governments therefore need to act now in order to avoid losing future technologies to Asia; at the same time, battery suppliers need a well-defined strategy to gain market share fast in order to survive, the consultancy cautions. And last but not least, investors should be aware of massive investment risks. Wolfgang Bernhart, Partner with Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, notes “Unfavorable factors are piling up. But managed correctly, electrified powertrains will still be a profitable market in the future.”

In related news, li-ion battery maker A123 stock is off 42% from its 52 week high, and Valance is down 67% from its 52 week high.

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Steven02 Steven02 on Feb 25, 2010

    Sounds like a market where only the strong will survive.

  • HerrKaLeun HerrKaLeun on Feb 25, 2010

    Roland Berger consulting is something like Anderson Consulting, it's the laughing stock in Germany. Not sure why someone gives them the honor of quoting them. sure, the manufacturers will consolidate. the same way all new industry companies consolidate once the mushrooming market stops feeding everyone. Many of the car, LED and anything else manufacturers won't exist in a few year. CPU, HDD and other manufacturers already went through this. No need to pay someone much money to predict the same thing for Li-ion manufacturers. Everything they say about overcapacity is pure speculation, at best. As long as mobile devices are growing, and more and more vehicles will have some type of hybrid powertrain, demand will go up. Of course, there is the shortage of Lithium, and maybe a better technology, but that is not what Roland Berger's interns wrote

  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
Next