By on January 7, 2010

Keep digging! (courtesy:Miami.FlyMe/Flickr)

With the world starting to gain stability economically and economists talking about “bull markets” you’d be forgiven for thinking we can start to be optimistic and why not? Ford are flying high, GM (prodded by the government) are adding third shifts and Chrysler’s sales “only” dropped 3.7% in December. Well, don’t be too sure. CNN Money reports that a survey conducted by KPMG of 200 auto and supplier executive showed that 88% of them believe there is still too much capacity in North American plants. In fact, the survey showed that the executives believe that overcapacity is a bigger problem today than a year ago and when you look at the figures, it’s a bit of a no brainer.

Wards Automotive estimates that with all the plant closings in North America, capacity was cut by 1.5 million to 18 million. But in 2009, only 10.4 million cars were sold and forecasts only predict the level rising to 11.5 million for 2010. “Despite the fact we’ve taken out capacity, if volumes remain low we will continue to be in an overcapacity situation,” said Betsy Meter, the auto industry audit leader at KPMG. The survey also showed that the executives believe that there will be more mergers and consolidation which will force the plant closings which the industry needs. And if the mergers and consolidation don’t bring about the productions cuts, then the impending Indian and Chinese invasion will.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

6 Comments on “Industry Survey: US Not Out Of The Overcapacity Woods Yet...”

  • avatar

    Not surprising really. Given the new transplant factories, I suspect we still have NA capacity for 14 or 15M vehicles. And plan to sell 11M this year.

  • avatar

    Well, we can fix the impending Chinese and Indian car problem easily by banning them outright until US exported vehicles can be sold unrestricted in those countries.

  • avatar

    US overcapacity is about the size of GM and Chrysler. Coincidence?

    • 0 avatar

      Yeah, but some of that capacity would be acquired and used after a proper bankruptcy. A spin off such as “Silverado Motor Corporation” that focused on trucks & SUVs would do fine.
      Hell, Toyota might consider partial ownership. Think of the option choices. Imagine an IFORCE V8 Silverado or a small block Tundra… The capacity has to go somewhere…

  • avatar

    No way.  China will demand that we purchase their vehicles in exchange for their purchasing our debt.  There will be quotas.

Read all comments

Recent Comments

  • RHD: Agreed about the lack of colors. A lot of new vehicles look like they just clearcoated the primer.
  • stuki: In a world in decay, “dated” is a compliment.
  • stuki: Competing head on with Camry and Accord, like competing with Google in internet search, has to rate among the...
  • RHD: That and the nearly useless “truck bed” make this a non-starter. I saw one on the road a week ago,...
  • RHD: You are right about that! A facelift is all it needs to recover the sales volume. “Polarizing” is...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber