Tata Defends JLR Acquisition

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Ford were mighty relieved when it managed to off-load it’s British marques, Jaguar and Land Rover, to Tata. Now after 1 year and 9 months of ownership, causing the normally profitable Tata Motors to fall into a £41 million pound loss and falling sales, how do you think Tata are feeling about the purchase of JLR? Sad? Depressed? Suicidal? According to steelguru.com, Ratan Tata is surprisingly optimistic.

If we assume that the global meltdown is a phenomenon that will be over in the near term, I think we will look back and say that these are very strategic and worthwhile acquisitions. There were many questions raised regarding whether these two large acquisitions Corus and JLR are worthwhile and whether the prices were right in terms of being at the top of the market, virtually. My view on that is that if you want to buy a house and that house is of a particular value, then it may not be there if you wait

I hate to break it to him, Jaguar Land Rover wasn’t a house in Belgravia, but a flat in Moss Side. But despite the toxicity of Jaguar Land Rover which is apparent to everyone except Ratan Tata, he still carried on optimistically saying that buying the company gave Tata “international brands” which would have taken years and billions of dollars to establish. Casually, omitting that Volvo, was also up for grabs, too. He then, laid out his plans for the marques in India.

“We have one retail outlet in the country and it is just imports against orders. It will never be the same until we look at another phase where there would be assembly in India, which in turn will depend upon the interest level and the ability of JLR to make that commitment to invest in India.”. The article finishes with this quote “I think JLR would at present moment continue to just look at importing to India and look at improving and securing its position in the territories in which it is strong.”

Was that a thinly veiled threat to management in the UK to pull their socks up? I don’t doubt that Tata Motors have a long term view of Jaguar and I believe their sincerity to restore the brands to their former glories. However, I wonder whether Tata simply do not grasp the monumental task in front of them. Maybe this bravado is for show? I just don’t want my favourite car company to be consigned to the history of books along side Packard, Studebaker, Pontiac, Saturn and Oldsmobile.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Tstag Tstag on Nov 22, 2009

    Whilst I think Tata could have got JLR for less money had the recession hit earlier. I do think that both brands are very smart long term investments. For a start it's easy to overlook a few key facts. Firstly JLR were making solid profits before the recession hit (that's why TATA paid an arm and a leg for it in the first place). Secondly Jaguar is very much a brand on the rise. The XF has been a sales hit and the XJ is receiving a lot of advanced orders. Then there is Land Rover. They have the baby hybrid Range Rover about 1 year away from launch and in Western Europe that will be a monster hit, just like the RR Sport was when that was launched (RR Sport increased Land Rover sales by over 40% at the time). Land Rover sales have been hit hard by the recession but now that's coming to an end their sales are rising as fast as they were dropping. JLR will get back to profit very soon. And for those of you who think they should have bought Volvo, well why? Their cars are old fashioned and their margins/ sales figures are awfull. At least JLR operates with high profit margins and it has a much better range. Also has JLR always been a basket case? How often did Land Rover ever lose money under BMW and Rover? (they were called the Jewel in the crown for a very good reason). As I recall their profits have only ever been dragged down by Jaguar and even that's on the mend. And don't forget before Ford bought Jaguar the XJ was a best seller. Yes Ford blew a fortune on JLR. Which was mostly spent fixing Jaguar's run down factories. But now Ford have spent the money, TATA will benefit.

  • Beemernator Beemernator on Nov 23, 2009

    The photo says it all. The man from Jaguar can't stop laughing. The man from Ford looks extremely relieved. They both look like they have just had a huge burden lifted from their shoulders. All that the Tata guy can manage is a phony photo opportunity smile.

  • Bil65789488 Consumers or manufacturers didn't kill sedans, the government, CAFE, and ZEV killed sedans. With far higher standards and taxes/penalties on sedans than SUVs or trucks, it is no mystery why this is happening.
  • Redapple2 Flyer: Caveat. Subaru. Near 9 inches ground clearance and near Land Rover AWD system, They can do some impressive things off road. (I m not talking Moab trails).
  • Corey Lewis The short truck is terrible. The tire blocks all rear visibility while making the tiny bed very tricky to access. And the wheels on it look like they're from 2002. Other than that, I really like the idea of the Grenadier and it seems like a good effort. I wouldn't buy one because of the tractor recirculating ball steering, which makes it terrible in everyday use.
  • Bjohnson10 Coast to Coast by the Jesus and Mary Chain. It's only about someone on a cross-country motorcycle trip while high on heroin.
  • Funky D A few from my road trip playlist: Eddie Rabbitt - Drivin' My Life AwayAmerica - Ventura Highway---Herb Alpert - Route 101Jerry Reed - East Bown and DownEddie Money - Shakin'Lindey Buckingham - Holiday RoadWar - Low RiderTears for Fears - Everybody Wants to Rule the World (Not a driving song per se, but if you've seen the video, you'll get it)Wang Chung - Wait (Gotta see the end credits of "To Live and Die in LA", for this one)
Next