Report: Tesla FSD Works Well Most of the Time - Until It Doesn't
Tesla’s Full Self-Driving system (FSD) is impressive, but it’s not actually capable of driving a vehicle by itself. Rated at Level 2 on the SAE automation scale, FSD requires an attentive driver ready to take control at any time. Even so, independent research firm AMCI Testing’s recent study showed that the system functions almost flawlessly in most scenarios, boosting drivers’ confidence, but that sense of security can cause significant problems when things do go awry.
AMCI tested a 2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance running the newest hardware and software over 1,000 miles of city streets, interstates, mountain roads, and rural two-lane roads. FSD performed well, but the organization’s drivers had to intervene more than 75 times while using the system. That’s an average of one intervention every 13 miles, and some of FSD’s missteps sound pretty dangerous.
One tester reported that the vehicle crossed the double yellow lines on a twisty mountain road, while another said the Model 3 stopped at a green light during city testing. AMCI’s director of testing, Guy Mangiamele, said, “What’s most disconcerting and unpredictable is that you may watch FSD successfully navigate a specific scenario many times – often on the same stretch of road or intersection – only to have it inexplicably fail the next time.
That relatively low rate of driver interventions may build a false sense of trust and confidence that FSD is capable of self-correcting in confusing situations, leading to more crashes. The CEO of AMCI’s parent company, David Stokols, noted that “with all hands-free augmented driving systems, and even more so with driverless autonomous vehicles, there is a compact of trust between the technology and the public. Getting close to foolproof, yet falling short, creates an insidious and unsafe complacency issue as proven in the test results.”
[Images: Brian Gallegos, mpohodzhay, Jose Gil via Shutterstock]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.
More by Chris Teague
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- The Oracle What a rash of clunkers.
- Zerofoo Not an autonomous system, but the blind spot assist in my CX-90 is absolutely flummoxed by TWO left turn lanes and shouts at me because there are cars in the lane I'm not in and have no intention of using.
- Jimble AMC was hardly flush with cash when they bought Jeep. Ramblers were profitable in the early 60's but the late 60's were pretty lean years for the company and they had to borrow money to buy Jeep. Paying off that debt reduced the funds available for updating the passenger cars and meeting federal air quality and safety mandates, which may have contributed to the company's downfall. On the other hand, adding Jeep broadened the company's product portfolio and may have kept it going in those years when off roaders were selling better than economy cars. AMC had a couple flush years selling economy cars in the 70's because of oil shocks but that was after buying Jeep, not before.
- Mnemic It doesnt matter who. These things are so grossly overpriced that they only need to sell a handful of them to cover the development costs. Why? Selling overpriced luxury cars is literally all of Germanys economy.
- Jalop1991 nope. A broken taillight will total the car.
Comments
Join the conversation