QOTD: Should People Reclaim the Streets?
I took a little bit of time this week to read this piece in The Atlantic that advocates for urban and suburban residents to close off local streets to cars, at least some of the time, in order to foster better relationships among locals.
Even as a committed car guy, I have to admit that the idea isn't terrible. Maybe it's because I grew up in an era where our lives as children wasn't super structured -- we could walk to the nearest park and we didn't have play dates. We just checked to see if our friends were free and if we could come over. We even did play in the street -- mostly street hockey, moving the goal when a car came. Just like in Wayne's World.
That said, while there definitely appear to be social benefits from making it easier for kids and their parents to congregate in the street, the folks who advocate for such things sometimes forget to factor in downsides. Such as how closing one street to create a pedestrian-friendly place can wreak havoc with traffic a few blocks over.
Infrastructure is a tricky thing. I love cars and I love driving, but I must admit that making too much of our suburban and urban infrastructure too car-centric has caused societal, if not environmental, problems. On the other hand, going too far in the other direction could cause unintended consequences.
I live in the city so I can have transit options -- I can drive, walk, take an Uber, take the bus, bike, or take the train. I like that my neighborhood is walkable -- one of the worst parts of living in the 'burbs was firing up the car to drive to the store and then killing the engine before it could even warm up, since the store was so close. Yet walking to the store wasn't a realistic option.
Conversely, I've been caught in some traffic snarls when a relatively lightly traveled side street shuts down for a block party.
I find myself drawn to places that are walkable without making driving from point A to point B difficult, and the social benefits described in the Atlantic piece seem real.
So my question to you is, how can we re-shape our infrastructure to improve life for pedestrians, playing children, and cyclists, without going too far and squeezing the flow of automotive traffic?
Sound off below.
[Image: Ivan maguire/Shutterstock.com]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.
More by Tim Healey
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Namesakeone It should be a name that evoques the wild west, that emphasizes the go-anywhere nature of how an SUV should be used. Something like a wild animal, maybe something like a horse. I've got it! How about . . . Mustang! Oh, wait. They already did that, didn't they?
- Slavuta There Used to be Pontiac Trans Sport.... That "Trans Sport" part has a totally new meaning these days
- 210delray You need to change the headline -- it's a 2025 model.
- Jeff How about Aspire for a new subcompact crossover from Ford because it aspires to be bigger and its buyers would aspire for a better vehicle if they could afford it.
- Jeff Carlos Travares wants to cut costs by 1/3. I don't see Chrysler or Dodge surviving too much longer especially since they are being literally starved for product. The success of the new Charger could extend Dodge a few more years but a failure might be a quick end to Dodge. I could see Stellantis moving more manufacturing for Jeep and Ram to Mexico which I believe will eventually be the only surviving brands of the old Chrysler. As for the Durango if it continues it will not be for too many more years it is an outdated product that I doubt will be redesigned especially when Jeep has a comparable product. Stellantis needs to address the high dealer inventory level by giving better incentives and low interest rates to clear excessive inventory.
Comments
Join the conversation