Texas: College Station Uses Public Funds to Influence Anti-Camera Referendum

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Officials in College Station, Texas used $20,000 in taxpayer funds in an attempt to influence residents to vote against a referendum that would ban red light cameras from the city. The city mailed to every voter a multi-color, bilingual brochure entitled “Red Light Cameras: Voter Education” in the hopes of convincing them to support a program that generated $905,688 in revenue for fiscal 2009. “A petition was filed by a citizens’ group asking the city council to let voters decide whether to keep or eliminate the red light camera system,” the brochure explained. “This item will be on the November 3 ballot.”

The brochure goes on to present a chart showing “red light related” crashes at photo enforced intersections in 2006 and 2007 — before cameras were installed — and in 2008 and 2009 — after installation. The enforcement industry created the “red light related” category of accident as a way to selectively exclude the types of accidents that increase following the installation of cameras. The brochure’s numbers also were not adjusted to reflect the significant decrease in traffic volume that began in 2007 as a result of recession and high gas prices. The drop in traffic resulted in a nationwide drop in the fatality rate to the lowest level the US Department of Transportation has ever recorded. In 2007, the rate stood at 1.38 deaths per 100 million vehicle-miles traveled. The figure plunged to just 1.15 in the first half of 2009.

Petition sponsor Jim Ash stopped the city from implementing a far more extensive plan to spend public money on a television and radio advertising blitz. Earlier this month, Ash filed an ethics complaint over a proposed brochure that would have included a number of what Ash described as potentially illegal claims.

“The false and misleading information is sufficiently substantial and important enough to influence a voter in the November 3, 2009 election,” Ash wrote. “Conversations, emails obtained as a result of ‘Freedom of Information’ requests indicate the city manager and members of the city council know the facts to be misleading and false. Knowingly using city money to misrepresent facts for the purpose of influencing an election is a violation of election code.”

After the complaint was filed, the city eliminated nearly all of the claims about the benefits of photo enforcement that were present in the twelve-page draft brochure. Early voting began on Monday in College Station. A copy of the final brochure is available in a 900k PDF file at the source link below.

Red Light Cameras Voter Education (City of College Station, Texas, 10/23/2009)

[courtesy thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Mpresley Mpresley on Oct 23, 2009

    The body of the article should support your headline better. I'm still waiting for you to cite the calls letters and describe their format...jazz, progressive rock, classical...

  • Kericf Kericf on Oct 23, 2009

    I lived in College Station for 6 years. Yes there is a lot of red light running but most of it being done is by the college kids who are the politician's main target with the cameras. They know the kids will just get their parents to pay the tickets and won't fight, or the tickets will be mailed straight to the parents if that's who the car is registered to. I never saw an accident due to red light running because there was a very generous transition time between the light turning red and the next light turning green. The TTI (Texas Transportation Institute) is base in College Station at Texas A&M and they study the lights and timings all the time. The traffic system is managed at a control center on west campus. Considering how bad college kids drive I very rarely saw an accident. If TTI does their job and conforms to the things they teach in class (I took transportation design as part of my major) then the cameras are not necessary. There used to be a good 3 second transition from red to the next green. Not sure if this has changed since I moved and they implemented the cameras. I do know you could see every intersection from the control center back when I was in school, but they didn't start cameras till after I graduated.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next