Volt Birth Watch 153: GM Plays the Babe Card

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

How did we miss facesofgm.com? I mean, it’s not like they have four (five?) other websites offering the public a look down the nationalized rabbit hole. But now that we’ve found it, well, way-hey! Clearly, New GM is playing the babe card; all three “faces” are female. Mel Fox by name, Mel Fox by, uh, nature. Needless to say, “the world of Mel” has been carefully sanitized by GM’s spinmeisters. Not so much Mel’s personal blog: theworldofallthingsmel. Here we get the idea that maybe Volt battery engineer Mel’s got mixed feelings about GM. “so i find myself asking… what can i do about this? [the root of the problems that we face in our nation is the mindset of humans, and the way people in power work to manipulate others, and the way that those being manipulated enable themselves to be manipulated again and again] the other question i ask is, how much of my career needs to involve invoking change vs. believing that what i’m working on is “good?” my point here is that perhaps it’s via the time donated to affiliations and public offerings that real change can be fostered as i don’t see too much within corporate america that truly facilitates change (fundamental change, that is).” On the other hand, Mel’s met the enemy and it is us!

i love that gm is so involved with social networking and sharing information about the employees at gm with the outside world. my perception is that the media perpetuates a horrible image of the automotive industry, and i am a big supporter of general motors showcasing the hardworking and interesting people that work on the inside!! one of my favorite things about working at gm is working with so many excellent people – i have been very lucky to develop good relationships with new people and seasoned veterans, and to be able to learn from and work together them in this very exciting industry!! :-)


Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 53 comments
  • Gordonjs Gordonjs on Aug 11, 2009

    I feel sorry for you, Ted, that you feel as if you can predict the success or failure of a vehicle over 12 months before it is released. I don't think that GM will have a problem selling the production numbers of the Volt. While it may be a somewhat niche market, there are enough trend setting early adapters that will be up for it. As for the Prius plug-in, while it is a very cool vehicle as well, it's very different than the Volt. If I remember correctly (and I could be wrong) the Prius plugin will still use an ICE intermittently throughout the drive cycle (highway speeds, acceleration, etc) and has a MUCH smaller battery capacity (5-10 miles all electric) In your OBVIOUS expert opinion, I fail to see how that would indicate 'game over' as you say, for the Volt. To make the assumption that anything toyota sells in this market will be instantly a hit, and anything that GM sells (even with, in this case, much better specs) will fail is baffling.

  • Rix Rix on Aug 30, 2009

    Ms. Fox is definitely quite good looking and apparently quite brainy as well. She is a very good spokeperson for GM. Of course the underlying reason she is in the video is to find someone who looks like the market GM would like to get back: Young, white, educated, upwardly affluent, eco-concerned. Those people buy Prius or Civic. My opinion is that the Volt technology may price itself out of the market in the short-medium term. GM doesn't have a great history of execution and I'm not convinced that being financially unstable will bring out the best in them.

  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Next