Ford Hearts Fours
Ford will be offering four-cylinder Ecoboost engines in a vast array of its forthcoming models, reports Motor Trend. The 2.0 EcoBoost will likely see base-model duty in vehicles ranging from the Edge and Mustang to the unibody 2011 Explorer, while replacing the V6 option in the Fusion and Escape. And though the EcoBoost two-liter looks good on paper (275 hp, 280 lb·ft), its projected ubiquity raises an interesting question: how important are engines in product differentiation? If GM’s blurring of the platform-sharing/brand-engineering lines hurts its brands, does the same hold true for Ford’s engine-sharing? Though modern engine control units theoretically allow Ford to customize engine characteristics (torque curve, power, efficiency) for each application, we’re not hearing anything about any such plans in the EcoBoost PR material. Could Ford’s engine uniformity hurt its appeal?
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Comments
Join the conversation
@gregaryous The bigger question is why do we need to waste the owner's money, petroleum, and the time of mechanics on stupid engine covers in the first place.
I remember having a bar debate with a die-hard Ford guy back in 2003. I told him that the Bonneville SSEi was a better car than the Mercury Marauder because it turned in the same (or better) performance and handling figures, FWD was more manageable in bad weather than RWD, and the Pontiac turned out better fuel economy figures. He told me I was wrong because a V8 RWD setup is a necessity for an American performance car. I defended Pontiac's honor, but deep-down I wished the Bonneville followed that formula. I wonder what he thinks about the product direction FoMoCo is going these days. _________ I also remember Ford fans (and ads) ripping into Buick, Cadillac, and Chrysler because they didn't offer a V8 RWD car. Man, what a difference six years can make.
I've read this entire thread and have made a couple distinct realizations. (1) Most TTAC commenters seem to think that the idea of an EcoBoost lineup is either non-damaging, or at best a positive branding strategy. (2) No one really knows yet whether the EcoBoost performs as advertised because their really isn't enough real-world data yet. (3) P71_CrownVic seems to enjoy bashing Ford with vague accusations but never responds back to posts that include actual DATA refuting his/her claims. Did Henry Ford run over your Great Grandma? What exactly is the reason for that oval shaped chip on your shoulder?