GM: Buy The Sky (Factory)

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

It’s not news per se. After all, we knew that Wilmington was on GM’s “endangered plant” list. But the idea that GM will somehow attract a buyer for a factory that builds a dead-in-the-water sportscar is laughable. After all, Chrysler still hasn’t found a home for its Viper nameplate, a brand that carries far more heritage and prestige than the Skystice. So what to do with Wilmington?

GM’s halo-of-the-moment, the Camaro, is still in the halo portion of its lifespan. No incentives necessary . . . for now. But long term, GM faces serious challenges as the Japanese automakers prepare to roll out a new generation of compact sports cars. And while the Camaro squares off against the Challenger and Mustang in the neo-pony car wars, the new Japanese offerings aim to offer more economy, efficiency and handling than the three retro-ponies.

Honda’s CR-Z is set to drop late next year, probably with a sportier version of the Insight’s IMA Hybrid system. The original CRX is cited as a major inspiration for the CRZ, which should weigh 2800 lbs and should go on sale in late 2010. Toyota is working on a sub-$30K sports coupe with Subaru, with rear wheel drive and a boxer engine. A hybrid version has been hinted at, as has a return to the MR2 name. And now Nissan is rumored to be working on a Miata-fighting “baby Z,” which should offer a drop-top, RWD and about 200hp according to Autoexpress.

All of this means that by late 2010 or 2011, the compact sports market in the US should be flush with options. Hybrid systems, RWD, boxer-power and drop-tops will give these “end-of-recession-specials” a unique enthusiast appeal that GM will be hard-pressed to compete with. The Camaro’s day in the sun will likely not be a long one, especially in the face of a resurrection of the cheap-and-tossable segment. A Kappa-based coupe with more practicality than the Sky or Solstice (perhaps along the lines of the 2004 Chevy Nomad concept) could keep GM in the fight, but at what cost? Moreover, with so much solid competition coming down the pipeline, who would buy up Wilmington with the intention of building more compromised Kappa sportscars?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • TreyV TreyV on May 12, 2009

    Ow. We just lost the Chrysler plant down the road in Newark. That's a huge number of blue collar workers to absorb back into the local economy here in Delaware if the GM plant goes too.

  • Gogogodzilla Gogogodzilla on May 12, 2009

    This could be a paperwork reshuffle for this factory. Daewoo sells a reskinned version of the Sky/Solstice in South Korea. If they bought the factory (which they'd have to, if they wanted to keep selling the model), then that factory would be a Daewoo factory... and Daewoo is, of course, owned by GM.

  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
Next