BMW '08 Profits Plunge 90%

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

BMW is not doing so well lately. I know; it’s tough all over. But there’s tough and then there’s a 90 percent profit plunge (to €330M). Aside from disappearing revenue, BMW shares something else with America’s domestic manufacturers: denial. Just-auto [sub] reports that Bimmer’s CEO reckons the sun will come out tomorrow. Well, the end of this year, anyway. And then everything will be alright, exactly as planned, ja?

BMW is sticking to the long-term targets set out in its so-called Number One strategy despite the current challenging economic times, the automaker said as it announced a fall in 2008’s net profit of almost 90% on Wednesday.

“2009 will be a transitional year for which we cannot yet make any reliable forecasts. Nevertheless, our long-term profitability targets for 2012 remain intact. We want to preserve the independence of the BMW group,” chairman Norbert Reithofer told the annual accounts press conference in Munich.

BMW currently assumes auto sales volumes will fall 10 to 20% this year but Reithofer expects the economy to pick up in 2010.

“At that point we will also gain additional momentum from our renewed product range. The ramp-up of our highest-volume models between 2010 and 2012 will reinforce this trend,” he said.

Ah, yes. High volume. As I pointed out yesterday, a luxury automaker chasing high volumes is a recipe for disaster. Anyway, Bimmer is not alone in facing (or not) this reality. But like they say, at least they’re independent, right? Their fate isn’t tied to anyone else. Oh wait . . .

Finance head Friedrich Eichiner said in his presentation: “We have been regularly holding talks on pooling purchasing volumes with Daimler. Both parties have identified a double-digit number of suitable components. None of these components help differentiate between the brands or are relevant from a customer perspective. Both companies – as well as our suppliers – will benefit from this in the foreseeable future.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 30 comments
  • Johnny Canada Johnny Canada on Mar 19, 2009

    @ ellomdian I owned a 540 E39, and now own a 530 E39. Both manual transmissions. Both sport suspension. I can honestly tell you that the rack and pinion steering in the six cylinder 530 makes it a much better car to drive.

  • JohnHowardOxley JohnHowardOxley on Mar 21, 2009

    Amen to all of the above on the beauty of the E39 series -- I am convinced it is going to go down as one of the "all time greats" of exterior design. The mention of the 507 brings up something that has puzzled me for a long time -- because that was another stunning car. If VW could bring back the Beetle, why does not BMW bring back a modernized 507? It certainly would look better than anything they have come out with in the past half-decade [though that would not be hard].

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next