By on March 20, 2009

Bloomberg sat down with Car Czarlet Steve Rattner to find out what he learned from his recent visit to Detroit, and his answer should surprise nobody: the automakers need more cash. When asked if aid to GM and Chrysler could be as high as $30b to $40b, Rattner replied “It could be considerably higher, I won’t deny that.” Yikes. Or should we say, yawn. Who didn’t see this coming? The folks in charge, of course. “What they’ve asked for depends on them achieving plans that are somewhat ambitious,” Rattner said. “Like all management teams they tend to take a reasonably, slightly perhaps, optimistic view of their business. So it could be more, I can’t rule that out.” Does that explain Chrysler’s recent proclamation that it’s better off than GM? “There’s no real uptick, no real sense that the company would generate meaningful amounts of cash flow on a stand-alone basis,” Rattner says of the Pentastar mess. “We have not made a determination on whether they could exist on a stand-alone basis, but we do find their idea of partnership with Fiat a worthy idea to consider.” Rattner says the Presidential Task Force On Autos will give a sense of its direction before the March 31 deadline, and will likely set a hard date for union and bondholder concessions because, as Rattner puts it, “nobody wants to go first.”

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

9 Comments on “Bailout Watch 449: More? More! Surprised?...”


  • avatar
    Mike the loser

    No.

    I doubt that even the hardest D3 groupies are shocked at this.

  • avatar

    The easiest thing to do is to keep doing what you’re already doing. Which is exactly what the PTFOA will do.

    Hope and change my ass.

  • avatar
    ZoomZoom

    Indeed, Robert.

    It’s like a big battleship; takes a long time to steer around things. The only way you avoid collisions and the ensuing order to abandon ship is to have a very alert and long sighted skipper in the wheelhouse.

    And as we know, that vision is nonexistant in the D3.

    That reminds me, it’s been awhile since we’ve gotten any shipwreck pics…

  • avatar
    Stein X Leikanger

    Meanwhile, back in the real world:

    Driving continues to decline in most of the country, including Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

    The recession, not high gas prices, is the most likely reason.

    “Clearly, economic conditions are having a prolonged effect on our driving habits,” said AAA spokeswoman Catherine L. Rossi. “Some people aren’t commuting because they no longer have jobs.”

    Less money also means fewer trips for shopping, entertainment and vacations.

    Americans drove 7 billion fewer miles this January than in January the year before, according to a new report from the U.S. Department of Transportation.

    Pennsylvanians drove 353 million fewer miles – a drop of about 4.5 percent.

    New Jerseyans racked up 363 million fewer miles, a decline of 6.5 percent, despite having some of the lowest gas prices in the nation.

    Nationally, driving has been declining since December 2007.

    During this 14-month span, motor vehicles have gone 122 billion fewer miles compared to the same period a year earlier (December 2006 to January 2008).

    Bucking the trend were 13 Western states, including Alaska and Hawaii. Overall, they posted a slight increase – 0.2 percent.

  • avatar
    Autobraz

    Easier to change your ass (may I interest you in some Brazilian designs?) than hoping this PTFOA will make something useful with your money.

  • avatar
    jerry weber

    If you look at the way GM was chewing up it’s own cash, why would anyone think that a little moersle of 14 billion would fuel the beasts furnace for long? GM has to play the game, now that you have 100 billion invested in your very own car companies, you can’t back out now and show the taxpayers nothing for your investment.
    We all know that success is just around the corner. We further know that the competition will stop developing and refining their products to let GM catch up. Uncle sam now has adopted a company a good 10 years behind the leaders and still falling back. We also know that when it comes to blowing the bow tanks and releasing hundreds of thousands of obsolete unwanted vehicles, the General will be as always up to the job. No one in the World out fire sales GM. But there is one bright spot, who is in a better position to build our tanks and staff cars for the next war? All of these truisms spell a nationalized car company that will never again be alone and out in the financial cold. When your uncle sam adopts you, your good forever.

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    The easiest thing to do is to keep doing what you’re already doing.

    And thusly you hit on a) the problem of modern corporate and government management and b) the pitfall of conservatism.**

    No one want to be the person to stick his or her neck out and affect real change, because no one want to be accountable for the effects of that change, lest they be bad. So play it safe and do nothing is the watchword.

    I don’t normally agree with De Lorenzo, but he’s right about the rampant cowardice in automobilia and government .

    ** in the classic sense of the word, not the loaded “versus liberalism” political sense.

  • avatar
    lw

    These guys better watch out… All the AIG rage could refocus on GM and Chryco. Scary stuff…

    Looks like AIG will go down pretty quick now.. Entire families are receiving death threats… Imagine your wife/kids got a death threat because of where you work.. Bet your not going to be doing much work anytime soon.

    Very scary… Let’s hope nobody gets hurt.

  • avatar
    lahru

    The only advantage I see Chrysler having over General Motors is that a smaller hole will have to be dug when it comes time to bury it.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • stuki: Wonder if anyone has ever plotted life expectancy vs number of Honda engines owned…..
  • stuki: If Californians came equipped with intelligence, they would focus on reducing noise, and particulates, instead...
  • stuki: Economical refers to total cost. Fuel, maintenance, initial purchase, weight etc. Hail Mary’ing to...
  • conundrum: No, these chairs are faux leatherette upholstered, chrome over white metal chassis all-singing all-dancing...
  • ajla: “Missing entirely from this Posky masterpiece of theatre is the technical reason for CARB’s new...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber