ABG Reviews World First Hybrid With Fender Vents

abg reviews world first hybrid with fender vents

Hey! What happened to TTAC’s invitation to the GM “Night on Bear Mountain” mass test drive? If it’s good enough for Autoblog and Jalopnik, it’s good enough for us. Of course, TTAC’s not in the tank for GM. We might do something impolite, like point out that the Saturn Vue 2 Mode Hybrid is an excellent example of everything that’s wrong with GM. (And that’s without driving it.) For one thing, product overlap. WITHIN SATURN. The Vue 2 [a kill] is the second hybrid system for the SUV, which will now sell alongside (in theory) the existing Saturn “light hybrid,” which was initially introduced as the Vue Green Line. It’s a model/technological distinction that will be completely lost on anyone even remotely resembling a potential customer. So, blissfully married and entirely hetrosexual Alex Nunez, who’s this thing for, then?

“…drivers who desire fuel economy on par with the four-cylinder hybrid, but want more power and/or towing capacity.” Both of them? Or maybe this excerpt offers us a better idea: “…three hybrid badges (one on each fender and one on the tailgate) and four hybrid decals (one on the windshield, one on the rear window, and the gigunda things that span the wheelbase along the lower door panels). Short of getting a full “HYBRID” bus wrap on the thing, you can’t really announce your greenie status any more unless you head to the Toyota store.”

Rhetorical heights well and truly scaled, Alex’ first drive winds down to the inevitable damp squib: “It does all the hybrid stuff you want/expect it to, and it performs well when called upon.” But, again, what’s the friggin’ point? “One thing’s certain: you’ve got some choices now, which is certainly not a bad thing.” Sigh. Sure. I was wondering when GM was going to offer us a choice of two different hybrid systems for the Saturn Vue. Oh, and Alex: Stendhal Syndrome. [Note to John Neff: where’s the disclaimer? And when you start asking the tough questions of the automakers, we’ll stop asking the tough questions about your coverage.]

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Runfromcheney Runfromcheney on Oct 27, 2008

    "[Note to John Neff: where's the disclaimer? And when you start asking the tough questions of the automakers, we'll start asking the tough questions about your coverage.]" Don't you mean "...we'll stop asking the though questions about your coverage."?

  • Robert Farago Robert Farago on Oct 27, 2008
    Runfromcheney : Yeah, that too. Text amended.

  • Johnster Not feelin' it. The traditional unreliability of turbo engines is a big turn-off, especially in a work truck that (I hope) you'd want to keep on the road for 200,000 miles or more without having major repairs.
  • ToolGuy Car audio is way overpriced.
  • Marty S The original Charger was a 2 door, as was the landmark 68 model. Its funny that some younger commenters are surprised that its not a four door. I never understood why modern Chargers have been four door sedans. I think the best looking Charger was the 68, absolutely perfect in its lines and proportions. This concept really emulates that and I think I think it looks great.
  • Master Baiter The D-bag elites like Al Gore demanding that we all switch to EVs are the type of people who don't actually drive. They get chauffeured around in black Yukon Denalis. Tesla does have a good charging network--maybe someday they will produce a car that doesn't suck.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird As a Challenger GT awd owner I lIke it’s heritage inspired styling a lot. There’s a lot of 66-67 as well as 68-70 Charger in there. It’s refreshing that it doesn’t look like a blob like Tesla, Volt/Bolt, Mach-e BMW I whatever etc. The fact that it’s a hatch makes it even better as a everyday driver thus eliminating the need for a CUV. If it’s well built and has a reliable track record I can see trading up to it in a few years.
Next