Global Biz Group: Biofuels Suck
The European Union (EU) wants to see 10 percent of Eurozone transportation powered by bio-fuels by 2020. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has come out in opposition, claiming biofuels’ ability to tackle global warming is strictly limited. Cooperate and develop this: the organization concludes that biofuels are only economically viable with large state subsidies (surprise!). What’s more, they reckon the mandated European bio-fuel surge could lead to “rising food prices and damage to forests and wildlife.” The OECD wants the EU to rescind its biofuels targets. Their alternative? Legislate energy-saving and more efficient vehicles. “You cannot feed people and soak up carbon and protect biodiversity and fuel cars,” says Brice Lalonde, the former French environment minister who chairs the OECD’s round table on sustainable development. C’est la verite.
Glenn is a baby-boomer, born in 1954. Along with his wife, he makes his home in Connecticut. Employed in the public sector as an Information Tedchnology Specialist, Glenn has long been a car fan. Past rides have included heavy iron such as a 1967 GTO, to a V8 T-Bird. In between those high-horsepower cars, he's owned a pair of BMW 320i's. Now, with a daily commute of 40 miles, his concession to MPG dictates the ownership of a 2006 Honda Civic coupe which, while fun to drive, is a modest car for a pistonhead. As an avid reader, Glenn enjoys TTAC, along with many other auto-realated sites, and the occasional good book. As an avid electronic junkie, Glenn holds an Advanced Class amateur ("ham") radio license, and is into many things electronic. From a satellite radio and portable GPS unit in the cars, to a modest home theater system and radio-intercom in his home, if it's run by the movement of electrons, he's interested. :-)
More by Glenn Swanson
Comments
Join the conversation
hal, if we did that, where would we get all the seamen for lipstick?
What a schizophrenic government we have here in Nebraska! One agency says that the ground water supply is being depleted at an alarming rate and wants to curtail irrigation. Another, says that what's left of the groundwater is undrinkable by the very young and the elderly unless filtered through an expensive reverse-osmosis process; due to excess levels of nitrates caused by over-fertilization of corn fields. Yet another agency confounds the other two by pushing the expansion of the ethanol industry--an industry whose viability, despite huge state and federal subsidy, depends upon cheap, heavily irrigated, nitrogen-fertilized corn.
EJ: Biofuel production has started out with food crops, because it’s easy to do. Obviously, the world needs to progress into the next phase. There's truth in that statement - but it's never quite as simple as that, is it? The powerful ag lobby, also had a lot to do with it. If we are trying to diversify our fuel supplies, why would we not import cheap ethanol from Brazil? Or cheap palm oil (for biodiesel) from Indonesia? At some point the government is going to have to decide whether they are serious about sustainable biofuels, or whether they just want to look for more under the radar ag subsidies. So far they seem to choosing the second option.
It does seem insane for us to try to grow our dependence on fuel from foodstocks. All we need is one major earthquake, hurricane, tsunami, or volcano in that part of the world, or an infestation or other potato-famine-like event to hit corn or to hit sugar cane or beets, and it's over with. We'll all be poor, sickly, and hungry. But at least we'll have that I'm-so-self-important E-85 badge on our useless cars in our garages.