Congestion Charging at The Energy Lean Buffett

Stein X Leikanger
by Stein X Leikanger
congestion charging at the energy lean buffett

Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway holding group, is the world’s second-richest human. Buffett’s no stranger to the transportation sector, having mopped up profits with Geico, Forest River (RV’s), McLane Company (foodstuff distribution) and the XTRA Corporation (semi-trailer renting and leasing). Berkshire Hathaway recently took a ten percent stake in the railroad company Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. Warren Buffett’s seen the future.

The future will have fewer trucks and a lot more rail carriages. Fewer people and goods will travel by road. Cars will be smaller and cleaner. People will use them less. Diminishing oil supplies and increasing demands upon this declining resource (especially with the explosive economic growth of fomerly third world countries like China) will make it so.

And if that doesn’t do it, concerns about global warming, clean air and healthy living will. In fact, a few years from now, anyone cranking up an internal combustion engine close to children will be hauled out of the car and forced to suck his own exhaust—and then plant a tree. OK, maybe I got a little carried away there, but you get the idea: The Energy Lean Age is here.

While Americans are just waking up to the enormous implications of this shift, their European counterparts have been living it for almost a decade. For a quick look at America’s future, let’s hop over to the capital of The Land of Hope and Glory.

In February 2003, London introduced a Congestion Charge for motorists entering the heart of the City. Currently, motorists entering the Congestion Zone must pre-pay an eight pound ($16) fee. If they forget, they’ve got to pay $20 before midnight on the following day. If they miss that deadline, but pay within two weeks, it’s a $50 fine. After that, it’s $200. Remember: this is PER DAY.

London is now looking to modify the charge to change the automotive mix. To that end, Mayor Ken Livingtone’s administration is set to introduce ”Emissions Influenced Charging.” Cars entering the City which emit up to 120g/km CO2 will pay nothing. Cars emitting 121-225g/km CO2 will stump-up the current charge. Cars emitting more than 225g/km CO2 will fork over £25.

A Range Rover Sport entering London will cost its driver a staggering $50 a day. On the flip side, if your car is small and clean, you won’t have to pay for the privilege of using London’s roads (any more than you already do through petrol taxes). You’ll also get a Politburo-style fast-track through town during rush hour and special parking areas.

Other European cities and towns are contemplating similar moves. (As you’d imagine, Germany’s Green Party is all over this one.) Meanwhile and additionally, there’s a growing move towards emissions-based ”road pricing,” a pay-per-mile scheme that monitors driver behavior via a GPS tracking device or number plate recognition cameras. Since 2005, German trucks pay between €0.09 and €0.14 ($0.12 and $0.19) per kilometer depending on their emission levels and number of axles.

The road pricing debate is fierce; critics on the left attack it as a regressive tax, while critics on the right warn it will stifle economic growth. Even so, road pricing’s environmental component has given the concept a huge boost. It’s clear European governments are bound and determined to use dramatic (not to say drastic) measures to skew the automotive market towards smaller and more fuel efficient vehicles.

It seems highly unlikely that the widening rift between activist European governments pushing carmakers to go small and clean, and the American government’s relative tolerance for gas guzzlers, will remain forever. Whether it takes a cataclysmic economic shock, or a gradual increase in gasoline prices, or environmental concern/lobbying, the U.S. will eventually move more in line with the European model. And begin adopting European ”energy lean” solutions.

Meanwhile, Japanese and European-based automakers are busy building cars that conform to this political paradigm. You can also count on the Chinese accelerating production of the cars GM Car Czar Bob Lutz derided a few years ago, when he told the world that ”Rich people don’t care about the price of gasoline.”

Whenever Bob looks at a large car, he would do well to think of a spitoon. That’s how popular large cars with internal combustion engines will be a few years from now. And they’ll soon be just as gone as spitoons– unless they somehow manage to become Energy Lean and Air Clean large cars.

Which is why Warren Buffett’s moving his money to trains and evaluating other green energy alternatives, including electric cars. Trust me. Mr Buffett knows a sure bet. (He may even sell his shares in NetJets one day.) You better hope what’s in your garage is Energy Lean by then: the second hand value of voracious landcruisers will drop in inverse proportion to Berkshire Hathaway’s spectacular investment history.

Join the conversation
2 of 70 comments
  • Stein X Leikanger Stein X Leikanger on Apr 29, 2007

    @ thx_zetec Urban planners, or to be precise "New Urbanism" influenced planners in the US, are in fact discriminating against large cars. Look up Walter Kulash for one reference.

  • Airglow Airglow on Apr 30, 2007

    I averged right at 30 MPG over 100K miles in my last company car, a 2003 Impala. The idea that you have to fold yourself into a tiny subcompact to get good mileage is a myth. I'm frankly shocked at how poor the mileage is for most compact and subcompact cars. You give up an awful lot of comfort and utility for a very small gain in efficiency. If you want people to use less gas, TAX IT!!! I would not look to Europe for solutions, since they came up with the disclacement tax decades ago. The displcement tax is the only thing I can think of more moronic than the CAFE law in the US.

  • Nopiho Kovaon GOOGLE
  • Inside Looking Out Scandinavian design costs only $600? I mean the furniture.
  • Akear Lets be honest, Lucid will not be around in five years. It does not matter that it is probably the world's best EV sedan. Lucid's manufacturing and marketing is a complete mess. The truth is most EV companies are going under within the decade.
  • Peeryog OK , my fault. But there were a number of inadvertent scatalogical references in the original post. To which, having the intellectual maturity of a 12 year old boy, I snickered.
  • Ajla People that buy a new Silverado or Sierra without a V8 are like the people that get salmon at Peter Luger.