By Justin Berkowitz
August 8, 2007 -
Sir Isaac Newton had a ninth law: all vehicles must gain mass with each passing generation. I know, I know: safety regulations, usable third row, American tastes, yada yada yada. And it’s true that the new, bigger Toyota Highlander exacts no fuel efficiency penalty for its extra height, width, length and weight. Even so, has the new Highlander lost something, as Toyota moves further and further away from cheap and cheerful towards pricey and ponderous?
The original Highlander’s bland sheetmetal made the Camry-on-stilts a sort of anti-Xterra for urban worriers. For reasons lost in the mists of machismo, the new Highlander has morphed into a CUV with a ‘tude. Not only has the model gained mass, it now bristles with malice. “Angry eyes” headlights combine with a Tundra-like raked windshield and bulging hood to create a vehicle that dares you to call it a cute ute.
The sheetmetal landscape is dominated by cartoonish, chunky features, from heavily indented side panels, to huge gaps in the wheel wells, to an immense block of grey plastic stretching right across the Highlander's posterior embossed with the word HIGHLANDER. In case you were wondering.
The Highlander’s interior is only slightly less manic. The previous cabin’s plain, po-faced layout constantly reminded its occupants they were flying economy class. The new model draws the top half of the dash downwards for a more business-like look, and then sprinkles spizzarkle throughout. The chrome-ringed cowls housing the main gauges set the theme: artsy “design” and electronic affectation over genuine quality and ergonomic excellence.
The Highlander’s plastics all look decent enough; some even boast fake grains and sophisticated textures. But they're harder than frozen pizza. You could cut your hand on the sun visor’s plastic flange, a sharp-edged hangover from a lackadaisical molding process. The Highlander’s cardboard egg carton headliner is the worst I've seen in a new car since fat Elvis roamed Las Vegas. The seatbacks are covered in a flocky "carpet" cloth that belongs in the triangular love nest of a ‘70s-era powerboat.
The soft-roader’s fit and finish is simply appalling. Some of the Highlander’s door panel's plastic pieces were so badly misaligned I assumed they were an homage to cubism. (They’re not.) Other than some handsome buttons on the dash that embody [what we traditionally think of as] Toyota quality, the Highlander is a riot of impoverished thinking AND execution.
As a people schlepper, the Highlander regains lost ground. The middle row is commodious, with easy ingress and egress. The trick center console detaches entirely and slides into a storage compartment. The third row is the main beneficiary of the Highlander’s growth. While the seat cushion is five inches from the floor, there’s now sufficient space for genuine adults. As long as you don’t mind having your knees at chin height, you’re good to go. For an hour or so.
As part of its move upwards (outwards?), the Highlander’s easily overwhelmed four-cylinder mill has been banished. As the standard 3.5-liter V6 kicks-out 270 horses and 248 ft.-lbs. of twist, sloth is no longer an option. The front wheel-drive Highlander can now motor from rest to 60 mph in an entirely respectable (especially for its size and weight) 7.6 seconds, growling most agreeably in the process.
Otherwise, the engine is supremely quiet and refined. Unfortunately, the five-speed automatic ain’t up to the job. Even with all-wheel drive, torque management is a major problem. Press on and the Highlander’s cog swapper hunts for gears. Meanwhile, the Sport-suspended Highlander jitters and shakes like an espresso addict. Spirited driving also dings the Highlander’s fuel efficiency, which [officially] clocks in at 17/23.
A few moments behind the wheel of the Highlander and you’ll know that Toyota’s chassis gurus have sacrificed all possibility of dynamic satisfaction to the gods of Novocain. The steering is light enough to turn with your eyelashes (closed course, professional driver), yet so slow your mind tends to drift before a major change of direction can be achieved. The brakes are effective enough, but so soft in their operation you expect to hear a pneumatic exhale when you’re done. Even in the "sport" variant, body roll is as bongo board bad.
Driving, schmiving. The new Highlander has all the features American crossover buyers have come to expect: alphabet soup safety technologies, supersized cup holders, [optional] DVD entertainment, power points aplenty, a backup camera and a nearly functional third row. While the plethora of electronic gizmos raises doubts about long term ownership costs, reliability has become less of an issue in consumers’ minds.
And there you have it: the reason Toyota has supersized the Highlander. The automaker knows its own growth depends on playing the American way, where bigger is better and more is more. The strategy puts Toyota’s soul at risk, but the buyer has spoken. As the new Highlander indicates, Toyota’s listening.
49 Responses to “ Toyota Highlander Sport Review ”
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 » Show All Reverse Order
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 » Show All Reverse Order
Leave a Reply
Back to Top
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe to Newsletter
More Reviews

Digg
del.icio.us
Blinklist
Furl
Netscape
Google
NewsVine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Windows Live
POWERED
August 8th, 2007 at 9:14 am
“reliability has become less of an issue in consumers’ minds.” why would you think that? reliability is what made toyota the world’s leading car maker and still represents a major factor in the buying decision. i drove one of these recently and thought the styling and interior were markedly improved over the homely and bland predecessor.
August 8th, 2007 at 9:57 am
Reliability for all cars has improved to the point where it’s not the deciding issue. That’s what the writer was saying.
August 8th, 2007 at 10:11 am
>>”Sir Isaac Newton had a ninth law: all vehicles must gain mass with each passing generation.”
Defying gravity of course is the latest edition of the Altima sedan, getting skinnier and shedding rear legroom.
August 8th, 2007 at 10:18 am
I’m surprised at the poor fit and finish of this vehicle. I know Toyota has to find a way to keep their costs down every time they supersize a model, but fit and finish and the perception of quality is what made them who they are. The GM-ification of this brand has consistently been predicted on TTAC and this new Highlander is just another example proving your point. Just goes to show you getting to #1 ain’t half as hard as staying there. You tend to lose your core principles when you try to please all of the people all of the time.
August 8th, 2007 at 10:34 am
Pulchritudinous? Is there some kind of contest going on?
August 8th, 2007 at 10:41 am
I’m surprised that fit and finish weren’t up to snuff, given Toyota’s recent admission at quality gaps in current gen Camry and Avalons and solemn promise to devote enough resources to the issue.
I’m not surprised to hear that it’s bigger, heavier, and still bland. That’s to be expected.
My prediction - it’s still going to be a huge seller for Toyota, especially if the 3rd row is no longer unusable.
August 8th, 2007 at 11:02 am
What you experienced with the Highlander is something that we call in the remarketing industry, ‘the China effect’.
A lot of components are being made out of cheaper materials, or simpler designs, in order to make the cars more price competitive. This has actually always been a mantra in the industry, “To make a cheaper product resemble a better one” but in the case of FFF & NVH, a lot of the late models are absolutely deplorable.
When you see a Dodge Caliber with 50k miles going down the auction block, you get a far clearer understanding of this reality. Unofrtunately much of the same can be said for the Camry & Avalon as well.
August 8th, 2007 at 11:04 am
I was expecting bland styling as well. But I was a bit surprised to see it’s still slightly truck-y, since it’ll rarely go off-road.
I like that we’ve evolved into more car-like shapes with our CUVs. Mazda CXs and Ford Edge come to mind.
This design just looks… confused.
August 8th, 2007 at 11:19 am
Well done, Justin. Especially your “overall” summary…that was perfectly stated. My wife, who doesn’t know what she likes when it comes to cars, would love this vehicle. I am happy because we can’t afford to put it on our list.
August 8th, 2007 at 11:25 am
17/23 MPG? My V-6 equipped, 4 wheel drive Tacoma pickup does better than that! For that kind of mileage you might as well ditch the Highlander and get a 4runner.
Of course, I don’t think the 4runner has a 3rd row seat, so maybe that’s the deciding factor. But can’t you get most minivans with AWD now? Which makes this vehicles niche…what?