Rare Rides: A 2009 Chevrolet HHR SS Panel, Desirability Guaranteed

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Today’s Rare Ride is the rarest version of Chevrolet’s retro-styled economy car of the 2000s, and you might never have had the pleasure of seeing one in person.

Presenting the HHR SS Panel, in which you shift your own gears.

To discuss HHR, we must first make a brief visit to Chrysler’s PT Cruiser. The PT Cruiser debuted in 2001 with retro-modern looks and a cutesy personality and was immediately popular domestically. General Motors was envious of the PT Cruiser’s sales success, but luckily for them, they’d hired its designer, Bryan Nesbitt, in 2001. A short while later, GM said “Make us a PT Cruiser too!”

And so the Chevrolet HHR debuted for the 2006 model year. Based on the same platform as the compact Cobalt, the HHR had many of the same retro characteristics and personality of the PT Cruiser. Initially, only the four-door hatchback was available, but for 2007 the Panel version joined the ranks and brought back a term long-forgotten by most: the sedan delivery. Your author has also heard it called a panel van or panel wagon. Engines available on the HHR were all of I4 configuration and from GM’s Ecotec family. A 2.0-liter turbocharged engine was the most powerful, joined by naturally aspirated 2.2- and 2.4-liter mills. Transmissions on offer were the oft-selected four-speed automatic, or a five-speed manual provided by GM or Getrag.

The Panel did not have rear seats but instead featured cargo management compartments. It did not have side airbags, and the rear cargo area was plastic instead of carpeted. Rear side doors were covered by a large plastic panel outside and were only openable remotely via dash-mounted buttons.

Initially, all Panels were LT, but trims extended to LS, and 2LT in 2008. Standard HHR trims extended to a new SS turbocharged version for the 2008 model year. The 2.0-liter engine in the SS produced 260 horses if equipped with the five-speed manual, but was turned down to 235 if an automatic was selected. GM extended the SS further in 2009 with the SS Panel. All examples used the 2.0-liter engine and forced the five-speed manual transmission upon eager race van customers.

SS versions used a different performance suspension to standard HHRs and were visually distinguished by a sportier front fascia, ground effects along the sides, a rear spoiler, and a boost gauge in the a-pillar. Wheels were also unique to the SS. The HHR SS Panel was sold for only one year, as it was canceled after 2009 along with the regular SS. The group responsible for the SS’ design, GM Performance Division, was shut down in 2010 as GM went through its bankruptcy. HHR lived on through 2011 before it was canceled without replacement.

Today’s HHR SS Panel has traveled 146,000 miles in its 12 years of life. In excellent condition, it asks an optimistic $9,950 in Seattle.

[Images: GM]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 49 comments
  • Tonycd Tonycd on Mar 10, 2021

    These, like their Cobalt parent, were also among the vehicles that were killing their owners when their substandard ignitions switches wore out and spontaneously shut off the car in operation, disabling the steering, power brakes and airbags.

  • DenverMike DenverMike on Mar 10, 2021

    A totally shameless, me too ripoff. And of a half baked turkey. At least Chrysler/Plymouth was putting out some unique crap. Plus GM was late to the show. Yet GM will stand around watching F-series and Ram eat their pickup truck lunch, not offering nearly the content, features, quality, options, choices, trim, packages, engines, models/specialties, or commercial/hotshot support. For decades.

  • Redapple2 I gave up on Honda. My 09 Accord Vs my 03. The 09s- V 6 had a slight shudder when deactivating cylinders. And the 09 did not have the 03 's electro luminescent gages. And the 09 had the most uncomfortable seats. My brother bought his 3rd and last Honda CRV. Brutal seats after 25 minutes. NOW, We are forever Toyota, Lexus, Subaru people now despite HAVING ACCESS TO gm EMPLOYEE DISCOUNT. Despite having access to the gm employee discount. Man, that is a massive statement. Wow that s bad - Under no circumstances will I have that govna crap.
  • Redapple2 Front tag obscured. Rear tag - clear and sharp. Huh?
  • Redapple2 I can state what NOT to buy. HK. High theft. Insurance. Unrefined NVH. Rapidly degrading interiors. HK? No way !
  • Luke42 Serious answer:Now that I DD an EV, buying an EV to replace my wife’s Honda Civic is in the queue. My wife likes her Honda, she likes Apple CarPlay, and she can’t stand Elon Musk - so Tesla starts the competition with two demerit-points and Honda starts the competition with one merit-point.The Honda Prologue looked like a great candidate until Honda announced that the partnership with GM was a one-off thing and that their future EVs would be designed in-house.Now I’m more inclined toward the Blazer EV, the vehicle on which the Prologue is based. The Blazer EV and the Ultium platform won’t be orphaned by GM any time soon. But then I have to convince my wife she would like it better than her Honda Civic, and that’s a heavy lift because she doesn’t have any reason to be dissatisfied with her current car (I take care of all of the ICE-hassles for her).Since my wife’s Honda Civic is holding up well, since she likes the car, and since I take care of most of the drawbacks of drawbacks of ICE ownership for her, there’s no urgency to replace this vehicle.Honestly, if a paid-off Honda Civic is my wife’s automotive hill to die on, that’s a pretty good place to be - even though I personally have to continue dealing the hassles and expenses of ICE ownership on her behalf.My plan is simply to wait-and-see what Honda does next. Maybe they’ll introduce the perfect EV for her one day, and I’ll just go buy it.
  • 2ACL I have a soft spot for high-performance, shark-nosed Lancers (I considered the less-potent Ralliart during the period in which I eventually selected my first TL SH-AWD), but it's can be challenging to find a specimen that doesn't exhibit signs of abuse, and while most of the components are sufficiently universal in their function to service without manufacturer support, the SST isn't one of them. The shops that specialize in it are familiar with the failure as described by the seller and thus might be able to fix this one at a substantial savings to replacement. There's only a handful of them in the nation, however. A salvaged unit is another option, but the usual risks are magnified by similar logistical challenges to trying to save the original.I hope this is a case of the seller overvaluing the Evo market rather than still owing or having put the mods on credit. Because the best offer won't be anywhere near the current listing.
Next