Honda Confirms Another Death Related to Takata Airbag Defect

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Saturday, Honda Motor Co. confirmed another death linked to faulty Takata airbag inflation units. While this is the seventeenth known fatality within the United States related to the defect, at least 26 deaths have been tabulated globally with nearly 300 injuries on the books since 2009. But it’s assumed the actual numbers are quite a bit larger since the affected vehicles go back much further than that.

The most recent incident involved a 2002 model year Honda Civic that crashed on August 20th in Mesa, Arizona. The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Honda jointly confirmed the airbag inflator as the culprit. Unfavorable conditions had led to the defective part rupturing during an accident after the propellant had broken down, causing the system to spray shrapnel inside the cabin just inches from the driver’s chest.

Considering the size of the Takata recalls (roughly 100 million units split between 19 major automakers), these are relatively rare occurrences. But they’ve impacted Honda at a much greater frequency due to its heavy reliance on the supplier. Of the 17 U.S. deaths, 15 are linked to Honda — with the other two having taken place inside Ford vehicles.

Honda noted that the 2002 Civic’s driver-side inflator had been under recall since December 2011 and the passenger-side airbag unit was recalled in 2014. According to Reuters, the vehicle had not been taken in for repairs for either issue:

Honda sent more than 15 mailed recall notices over eight years to registered owners of the vehicle before the crash and made other attempts to contact owners. The driver killed was not the registered owner and Honda said it was not certain if the driver was aware of the unrepaired recalls.

The most recent previous fatal confirmed U.S. incident was the June 2018 death of a driver after the crash of a 2002 Honda Civic in Buckeye, Arizona.

While taking care of recalls is always important, these are the kind of life-or-death repairs owners definitely shouldn’t ignore. Those living in particularly warm climates where humidity fluctuates throughout the year should take particular care, as these are the conditions that seem to exacerbate the issue most. Though we wouldn’t recommend sitting on anything if you happen to live in an arctic tundra. This is basically the equivalent of having an IED strapped to your steering wheel.

Worried your vehicle might be under recall? Head over to the NHTSA website and input your Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) to see if there’s anything that needs fixing.

[Image: 360b/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 18 comments
  • Carrera Carrera on Oct 07, 2020

    The bigger problem though is that replacement airbags have the same propellant. Basically the owners are buying another 5-6 years best case scenario. I changed my Pilots in 2014 so I am on borrowed time, again.

    • Redgolf Redgolf on Oct 07, 2020

      Maybe you should sell/trade on a new GM! Buy yourself and family some peace of mind and possibly lives!

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Oct 08, 2020

    I was called directly on my 2008 Ford Ranger for a defective air bag inflator. The caller set up an appointment for me next Tuesday. I bought the Ranger last June and knew about the recall but never got around to making an appointment. I am glad they called me.

  • Kwi65728132 Nothing surprising here, give a company an inch and they'll take a mile (and your data)...If it bothers someone that their "connected" car is spying on them then maybe they should make a tin foil hat for their car, or buy an older car without connected tech or old enough that the connected tech can no longer phone home due to that generation of cellular service being turned off; my 2014 Hyundai is no longer connected as 3G service has been turned off as of last year and so far, car manufacturers have not clued in on the idea of a common interface standard for cellular modems so upgrades in wireless service would be plug and play.Not that being able to remotely start your car from 10,000 miles away was a smart idea anyway.
  • Dartman Blah blah blah. Methinks some people doth protest too much; hiding something? If it really bothers you so much follow John Prine’s sage advice: “Blow up your TVThrow away your paperGo to the (another?) countryBuild you a homePlant a little gardenEat a lot of peachesTry an' find Jesus on your own"
  • Bd2 Please highlight the styling differences.
  • ToolGuy @Matt, not every post needs to solve *ALL* the world's problems.As a staunch consumer advocate, you might be more effective by focusing on one issue at a time and offering some concrete steps for your readers to take.When you veer off into all directions you lose focus and attention.(Free advice, worth what you paid for it, maybe even more.)
  • FreedMike What this article shows is that there are insufficient legal protections against unreasonable search and seizure. That’s not news. But what are automakers supposed to do when presented with a warrant or subpoena – tell the court to stuff it in the name of consumer privacy? If the cops come to an automaker and say, “this kid was abducted by a perv who’s a six time loser on the sex offender list and we need the location of the abductor’s car,” do they say “sorry, Officer, the perv’s privacy rights have to be protected”?This is a different problem than selling your data.
Next