Daimler Agrees to Pay $2.2 Billion Diesel Emissions Settlement

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Daimler has officially agreed to pay $2.2 billion as a resolution to the United States’ diesel emissions cheating investigation and over 250,000 claims from Mercedes-Benz customers. The automaker stated that it was likely going to settle in August, estimating a need to set aside roughly $1.5 billion to appease U.S. authorities. Another $700 million was earmarked for civil suits, with the company assuming millions more would be needed to fulfill the requirements of the various settlements.

Court documents shared by Reuters show the company agreeing to pay 250,000 owners up to $3,290 each on vehicles that exceed regulatory emissions standards through the use of emissions cheating software. It also decided against opposing spending $83.4 million in attorney fees and expenses for the owners’ legal representation — something Volkswagen called “unwarranted” in a similarly sized suit where the attorneys were only asking for $59 million. However, VW’s emission woes have remained obnoxiously persistent since 2015 and have cost it well over $40 billion.

By contrast, Daimler is getting off with a slap on the wrist by settling for just a couple billion smackers. Although the likelihood of further criminal action remains relatively high in both the United States and Europe. Keep in mind that it took prosecutors nearly five years just to get this far and governments around the globe are disavowing diesel vehicles as if they appeared in a group photo on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island.

From Reuters:

Daimler noted in court papers it denies the allegations “and does not admit any liability.” The settlement does not include an external compliance monitor, it added. The German automaker still faces an ongoing criminal back investigation and could face additional U.S. financial penalties.

The settlements require Daimler to address the vehicles’ excess emissions as part of binding consent decrees. Daimler will issue recalls and extended warranties but is not required to buy back vehicles unless it is unable to offer an emissions fix within a required timetable.

The Justice Department said Daimler failed to disclose at least 16 auxiliary emissions control devices, the government alleged, allowing “vehicles to perform in a variety of consumer-desirable ways, including allowing for fewer (diesel exhaust fluid) tank refills (and) better fuel mileage.”

Breaking the fines down, the settlement includes an $875 million civil penalty over violating the Clean Air Act and an additional $546 million to “repair” polluting vehicles and offset excess emissions. Daimler will also have to pay the State of California $285.6 million and previously agreed to shell out 870 million euros (roughly $1 billion) in Germany over diesels that failed to meet EU regulations.

Deputy Attorney General Jeff Rosen said the American settlements “serve to deter any others who may be tempted to violate our nation’s pollution laws in the future.”

That seems probable but we’re doubtful that it will solve the problem outright. There are several other vehicle manufacturers that are under investigation for similar assumptions of industrial maleficence. Some, like Fiat Chrysler, are also on the hook for using illegal software (defeat devices) designed to falsify testing results used by federal regulators. Considering how difficult it seems to be for automakers to adhere to increasingly rigid emission mandates, we’re dubious that this all ends after a handful of gigantic fines. Though it may become a non-issue for diesel vehicles because the industry seems to be moving away from them as quickly as possible on most automotive applications.

[Image: Franz12/Shutterstock.com]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Whatnext Whatnext on Sep 15, 2020

    It was a big mistake for the Germans to flee diesels in Canada and judging from the price of used Touareg TDIs here, I'm not the only one who feels that way.

  • Brn Brn on Sep 15, 2020

    "$83.4 million in attorney fees and expenses for the owners’ legal representation" This is why class action lawsuits exist. Had one where I was owed about $50,000. We won a class action lawsuit and I got $11 (not eleven thousand, but just eleven). The firm got millions. I shoulda bought a diesel.

  • Redapple2 4 Keys to a Safe, Modern, Prosperous Society1 Cheap Energy2 Meritocracy. The best person gets the job. Regardless.3 Free Speech. Fair and strong press.4 Law and Order. Do a crime. Get punished.One large group is damaging the above 4. The other party holds them as key. You are Iran or Zimbabwe without them.
  • Alan Where's Earnest? TX? NM? AR? Must be a new Tesla plant the Earnest plant.
  • Alan Change will occur and a sloppy transition to a more environmentally friendly society will occur. There will be plenty of screaming and kicking in the process.I don't know why certain individuals keep on touting that what is put forward will occur. It's all talk and BS, but the transition will occur eventually.This conversation is no different to union demands, does the union always get what they want, or a portion of their demands? Green ideas will be put forward to discuss and debate and an outcome will be had.Hydrogen is the only logical form of renewable energy to power transport in the future. Why? Like oil the materials to manufacture batteries is limited.
  • Alan As the established auto manufacturers become better at producing EVs I think Tesla will lay off more workers.In 2019 Tesla held 81% of the US EV market. 2023 it has dwindled to 54% of the US market. If this trend continues Tesla will definitely downsize more.There is one thing that the established auto manufacturers do better than Tesla. That is generate new models. Tesla seems unable to refresh its lineup quick enough against competition. Sort of like why did Sears go broke? Sears was the mail order king, one would think it would of been easier to transition to online sales. Sears couldn't adapt to on line shopping competitively, so Amazon killed it.
  • Alan I wonder if China has Great Wall condos?
Next