What Ever Happened to Mercedes' Dieselgate?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

After Volkswagen admitted to equipping some of its diesel-powered autos with illegal software designed to circumvent emissions testing in 2015, every automaker on the planet fell under enhanced scrutiny. By 2016, U.S. regulators were checking on Mercedes-parent Daimler to see if there were any pollutant-related shenanigans taking place behind the scenes. Germany followed suit shortly thereafter, launching its own investigation.

However, with no local updates on the matter, it was presumed Daimler was in the clear — except Germany did find evidence of corporate misdeeds and the company recalled 3 million vehicles in 2017. At the time, we figured the situation would swiftly bleed over into the United States and help wrap things up. But it hasn’t yet and The Detroit News took time this month to ponder what’s taking federal regulators so long.

Busting VW took the government about a year and a half, while the Daimler investigation has been ongoing for double that. The last major breakthrough happened over a year ago, with regulators suggesting Mercedes’ diesels may have been equipped with illegal software. An engine management function called Slipguard apparently recognized whether the car was undergoing testing procedures while another, called Bit 15, halted emissions cleaning after roughly 16 miles of driving. But we haven’t heard much since.

“Three years seems unusual,” John German, a former EPA official and a senior fellow at the International Council on Clean Transportation (the group that commissioned the study that uncovered Volkswagen cheating).

From The Detroit News:

In April, consumer advocacy and environmental groups sent a letter to Congress asking that the investigation be expedited.

“It is past time for greater urgency and action from regulators and Congress on the allegations against Mercedes,” the advocates wrote. “Owners and lessees of Mercedes diesel vehicles have been left without answers or recourse while the illegally polluting vehicles remain on U.S. roads.”

American regulators’ inquiry into Daimler began in 2016 when the Department of Justice asked the company to conduct an internal investigation into its diesel exhaust emissions. Since then, the automaker has stopped selling diesel-powered passenger cars in the U.S.

“To me, that suggests that they had a problem and they’re trying to limit their exposure to that problem,” German said.

Back in the initial stages of the investigation, Daimler claimed that the accusations against it were preposterous and that it would fight back using all legal means at its disposal. It also expressed its distaste for the frequent raids conducted by German prosecutors. While automotive manufacturers found themselves subjected to a bit of a diesel emissions witch hunt following VW’s crisis, some industry analysts assumed it would only be a matter of time before investigators would uncover another major scandal (there were plenty of lesser ones). They appeared to be correct, at least in Europe.

Daimler said it has continued cooperating with U.S. authorities/regulators — neither of which have anything to say on the matter. Mercedes-Benz is also in the midst of a class-action lawsuit over claims that it knowingly sold cars to U.S. customers that polluted more than the company let on. And there’s been added attention stemming from last months’ news that the company is being forced to recall an additional 60,000 Mercedes-Benz models built between 2012 and 2015 in Germany.

It might just be a matter of time before U.S. regulators are forced to say something, even if that something is inconclusive.

[Image: Pixfly/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 10 comments
  • ThomasSchiffer ThomasSchiffer on Jul 09, 2019

    In Europe, after news of the Volkswagen Diesel Scandal broke, all European, Japanese, Korean etc. manufacturers were investigated, and to nobody’s surprise, most of their gasoline and Diesel cars emitted more pollutants in the real world than under controlled laboratory settings. The dirtiest diesels came from Fiat and Renault, if memory serves me right.

    • Lockstops Lockstops on Jul 10, 2019

      That was already part of VW's cover-up campaign. It's perfectly legal for cars to have higher emissions in the real world than in the lab. Lots of media outlets also had completely false narratives about overall fuel economy figures (and therefore CO2 emissions) not matching lab figures, which is even dumber. VW had cheat devices. They organised and planned within their organisation a large-scale criminal act. Plain and simple. If you can't prove that others had cheat devices then there's nothing to prosecute.

  • MBella MBella on Jul 09, 2019

    All cars will excede allowable emissions levels during some parts of their drive cycle. This is allowable in the regulations. When you floor it, do you think the emissions are in the normally allowable limit? It can't happen during the whole drive cycle though. When I was a Mercedes tech, those diesels were using AdBlue (DEF) like crazy. We were putting in more than 20liters of the stuff every service. NOx sensors, AdBlue pumps and injectors were constantly failing. I can guarantee you those systems were not being defeated.

  • Tassos On the SERIOUS Side: A Reliable ROlls ROyce never imported in the US was the V12 CENTURY. Now you can import 25+ year olds, which may be OK for Tim but NOT for us who need an UP TO DATE vehicle. The Century was a top exec car with a SUMPTUOUS interior, far superior even to the Lexus LS. UNfortunately, the latest century model is a Rolls Royce CULLINAN CLONE SUV, which I would not be dead driving. I suggest Toyota EXPLOIT their experience with the Century and produce a FLAGSHIP SEDAN that will be EQUAL to RR in luxury AND far better in RELIABILITY and at half the price of buying AND 10% of the cost of OWNING due to much less repairs. I am SURE the market is so small in this segment, that they will NOT do it, and deprive us of this LEGENDARY Vehicle in the Future As well.
  • Lou_BC I pulled over into a road side rest stop once because the rain got so bad that I could barely see. Several other vehicles followed. As I sat there in my F150 watching, a Corvette wailed by. How could they not feel the vehicle hydroplaning? The steering on my heavy truck with excellent tires felt numb.
  • Lou_BC Maloo GTSR W1
  • MaintenanceCosts E34 M5 3.8. Not sure there has ever been a more charismatic engine than the S38B38.
  • 28-Cars-Later Sadly, fewer motorists bothering to buy insurance [because they are unwanted illegal aliens] will likewise be used as an excuse to raise rates on those that do.
Next