Braking Bad: Ford Recalls Mustang for Brake Pedal Problems

by Matthew Guy

Published: September 28th, 2020

braking bad ford recalls mustang for brake pedal problems

Hey, it’s Monday – you can’t blame us for picking that low hanging fruit in the headline. Bad puns aside, owners of certain 2020 model-year Mustangs equipped with a slushbox should visit their dealership post-haste to rectify what could be a terrifying problem.

According to the safety nerds at NHTSA, the brake pedal bracket in certain 2020 Mustangs equipped with an automatic transmission may fracture during sudden stopping. The root cause of this condition, according to NHTSA, is “insufficient design margins for noise factors” within brake pedal engineering specifications. In other words, a supplier changed how they built the thing.

The brake pedal bracket material was apparently changed from nylon to polypropylene at some point leading up to the production run between March 2019 and August of this year. A total of 38,005 Mustangs have been identified as affected by the defect and, to throw a wrench into the mix, the vehicles are not produced in VIN order.

NHTSA docs state that Ford has known about this since last summer. On August 4, 2019, a concern related to three reports of brake-pedal bracket fracturing was brought to Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group for review. Ford analyzed parts returned and determined the brackets failed via brittle overload.

As of September 9, 2020, Ford found there had been four reports in the European market and two reports in the North American market of brake-pedal bracket breaking at pivot location during spike stop braking. With this in hand, the company’s Field Review Committee approved a field action roughly a couple of weeks ago.

Ford says they are not aware of any reports of accident or injury related to this condition which is good because, y’know, brakes. Dealers were notified about this campaign last Thursday so they should know what you’re on about when contacted. Owners can also call Ford at 1-866-436-7332 or use the NHTSA’s lookup tool to see if their car is affected.

[Images: Ford]

#Brakes #Ford #Mustang #NHTSA #Recall

Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 18 comments

EBFlex on Sep 28, 2020

Built Ford Proud! This is a result of the furniture salesman squeezing suppliers to the bone to keep the profit percentage as high as possible. All vehicle programs must be above X% in terms of profit. And to achieve that quality must drop (Explorer, Blazer, Ranger, etc).

Like Reply
Rpn453 on Sep 29, 2020

Yikes. I can imagine them having to recall all the nylon ones too, at some point in the future. Doesn't seem like the place to save weight and money by avoiding metal.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

JK Savoy Blue is a thing, but Sestriere White? Sestriere is a ski town near Turin, so I guess it meant to conjure up thoughts of snow. Pretty car. I hope Pininfarina has success. The industry in and around Turin has taken a big hit and is a shadow of its former self.
Ravenuer My 2023 CRV EX, 6 mo old, 4800 miles: $0.
TheEndlessEnigma My '16 FiST: Oil changes, tires, valve cover gasket (at 112k miles), coolant flush, brakes.....and that's itMy '19 Grand Caravan: Oil changes, coolant flush
John Clyne I own a 1997 GMC Suburban that I bought second hand. It was never smoked in but had lost the new car smell when I got it four years after it was sold new. I own a 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche & that still has the new car smell. I like the smell. I could never afford a new car until the Avalanche. It might be my last new car? Why do they build cars with fire retardant materials in them. Smoking rates are falling & if someone continues to smoke in this day & age is a fool especially with all the information out there.
Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.