CX-30 Propels Mazda to Another Monthly Sales Gain

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The not-quite-subcompact CX-30 arrived at just the right time for Mazda, appearing at the tail end of what had been a grim 2019 for Mazda. Just as sales of the new tweener crossover matured, the pandemic hit.

As volumes struggle to regain potency across the industry, the new arrival in the Mazda stable helped the automaker post back-to-back monthly sales increase in June and July, replacing volume lost among the brand’s passenger cars — and then some.

July saw Mazda, one of the few remaining automakers to report sales on a monthly basis, post a 3.4 percent year-over-year gain.

Through the first seven months of the year, the CX-30 has racked up more sales than the compact Mazda 3 sedan and hatch, placing it a distance second among the brand’s offerings. The 3,787 sales seen in July were enough to offset losses elsewhere in the brand.

Sales of the 3 fell 11.5 percent for the month, with the 6 sedan declining 19.2 percent, year over year. Even the brand’s bread-and-butter model, the CX-5, recorded a dip of 11.3 percent. The truly subcompact CX-3 lingered in triple-digit volume territory, down a significant 37 percent (cannibalism alert!), and the spike in MX-5 Miata sales seen earlier this year gave way to a similar YoY decline as roadster-buying season ebbs.

Elsewhere, the range-topping CX-9 posted a gain of 9.4 percent. It’s the only Mazda that can boast of a year-to-date sales improvement.

Had Mazda already shed the CX-3, a model that’s expected to be replaced by the CX-30 before long, it still would have found itself in the black, sales-wise, last month. This only demonstrates the importance of the new CUV. As Mazda’s passenger cars, like those of other automakers, shows no sign of bottoming out in popularity, the unnamed crossover expected out of Alabama next year is an ace up the sleeve for future volume.

[Image: © 2019 Chris Tonn/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 18 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Aug 04, 2020

    Why don't we start bitching about everything else that has grown in size? A 1970 Honda Civic had a 86.6 inch wheel base, 139.8 long and weighted 1,500 lb. A 2020 Civic 106 in wheelbase, is 177 inches long, and weighs 2763 lbs.

    • Scoutdude Scoutdude on Aug 05, 2020

      In 1970 Honda hadn't started making the Civic yet, What they sold in the US in 1970 was the Honda 600 a 2cyl Kei car. The new for 73 Civic was an expansion into "real" cars and much larger than the 600.

  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Aug 05, 2020

    I was looking at the specs of a 1070 Honda Civic compared to a 2020 Civic. The 2020 Civic has doubled in size. Isn't that a 200% increase? Where is the outrage, the pages and pages of complaining that it is too big?

    • See 1 previous
    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Aug 05, 2020

      @ToolGuy 1973MY Civic was the first one sold in the U.S. The length grew for 1974MY which I assume is related to bumpers. I would recommend comparing the 2020 Honda Civic to the 1974 Honda Civic (46-year gap). The 2020 Honda Civic is significantly larger than a 1974 Honda Civic. Honda does sell a Fit in the U.S. in 2020. The 2020 Honda Fit is also significantly larger than a 1974 Honda Civic. Where things get really interesting is doing a 2020 Honda Fit comparison to a 2020 Honda Civic (LxWxH; the mass comparison is interesting too). The theoretical 'box' we would build to contain a 2020 Honda Civic (smallest dimensions) is 6.8% larger than the same 'box' for a 2020 Honda Fit. But the Fit is taller, so using the Civic height for the Fit (or Fit for the Civic) gives us a difference of 16.5%.

  • Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
Next