Best-laid Plans, and All That: Daimler Cuts Likely to Continue

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Daimler plans to turn up the volume on cost-cutting measures due to operating losses in the second quarter that haven’t officially manifested. CEO Ola Källenius believes the damage caused by the pandemic response will be too severe to proceed with business as usual for the rest of 2020. At the company’s annual meeting, held Wednesday, the CEO told shareholders to anticipate additional measures to protect profits.

“Our previous efficiency goals covered the upcoming transformation, but not a global recession. That’s why we are further sharpening our course,” Källenius said, noting that the company is currently in talks with labor representatives. Considering the automaker enacted a plan bent on reducing its workforce by at least 10,000 to save an estimated €1.4 billion ($1.6 billion) by 2022, we doubt those discussions are super cordial.

Despite its second-quarter earnings report not landing until July 23rd, Daimler said it expects a significant decline in sales. Sales of the mainstay Mercedes-Benz brand declined almost 19 percent in the first half of 2020, though Automotive News reports that the manufacturer’s Chinese deliveries returned its best second-quarter volume on record. June also looked pretty healthy from a global perspective, with Källenius noting they actually surpassed the previous year.

That makes Daimler look a bit greedy on its face, though a short-term gain in demand after a prolonged dip isn’t indicative of anything other than people’s ability to finally make it back to the dealership. It also doesn’t absolve the company from mistakes made prior to the pandemic. Those original cuts have absolutely nothing to do with COVID-19, but the 10,000 additional jobs prognosticated by Automobilwoche in June would, assuming Daimler pulls the trigger on the extra round of cost cutting hinted at by Källenius.

From AN:

A string of profit warnings, several of which predated COVID-19, exposed misguided investments and the vulnerability of Daimler’s business, Deka Investment said ahead of the meeting.

“We look back at a lost year for Daimler,” Ingo Speich, Deka’s head of sustainability and corporate governance, said in prepared remarks. While Speich supports Kallenius’s cost-cutting and focus on cash generation, he said the CEO carries some responsibility for Daimler’s woes because he served as development chief under Zetsche.

Daimler shares have declined 24 percent this year, giving the automaker a market capitalization of about 40 billion euros ($45 billion), less than a fifth of Tesla’s valuation.

Tesla’s valuation is ludicrous at the moment, so that last bit can be mostly overlooked as a helpful comparison. We also don’t know how much value to place upon the opinion of a “head of sustainability,” as their job title literally forces them to endorse green tech at every turn. Speich predictably crapped on Mercedes’ EQ line of all-electric vehicles, ignoring the fact that Tesla seems to be the only automaker that has turned EVs into profits; demand for them is nowhere near strong enough to support the rest of the industry.

You’re probably wondering why he’s quoted, then. Deka Investment owns about 5.4 million Daimler shares, making it one of the many financial backers that are just fine with the job cuts but totally averse to waning profits or a lessened commitment to electrification. That’d be fine if the stance wasn’t frequently at odds with itself. While zero-emission vehicles are presumed to become mainstream transportation eventually, aggressive investments in green product development these past few years has negatively impacted the profitability of most major automakers.

It seems boneheaded to expect any manufacturer to miraculously churn out truly desirable ZEVs without burning through billions in R&D funds, but that seems to be what many shareholders are demanding. Tesla, which has been around since 2003, has only recently started turning a profit — aided heavily by its ability to sell carbon credits to mainstream brands that still build combustion cars. Yet investor expectations remain untempered by the realities of the market, making Daimler’s issues all the more complicated. It will also require a solution that’s more creative than simply minimizing overhead via continued staffing reductions and hoping demand jumps through the roof in 2021.

[Image: Franz12/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Jul 08, 2020

    Mutilating oneself towards profitability.

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Jul 08, 2020

    May be GM buys them (no marriage of equals this time, sorry Dr.Z) and makes Daimler-Benz division "The New Standard of The World"? And let Cadillac to fend off Tesla. Or Tesla buys Daimler-Benz and makes it a a junior sub-brand of itself?

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next