'Real People' Ad Chief Leaves Chevrolet

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The man behind a Chevrolet ad campaign that spawned a particularly hilarious, long-running spoof almost from day one has left the company, Automotive News reports.

Chevrolet ad chief Paul Edwards took a walk Thursday, with General Motors replacing the brand’s U.S. marketing VP with Steve Majoros, currently the bowtie’s director of cars and crossovers marketing.

According to a company spokesperson who spoke to AN, Edwards left GM today to pursue other opportunities. A longtime employee, Edwards served as director of advertising and sales promotion for Chevrolet from 2007 to 2010, moving on to become executive director of global marketing for GM. In 2014, he switched to the role he vacated today.

The automaker has not yet announced a replacement for Majoros’ vacated post. Majoros joined the company in 2013 and accepted the Chevy cars and crossovers file the following year. Before joining GM, Majoros spent 25 years at marketing firm Campbell Ewald.

Currently, Majoros is busy touting the new C8 Corvette, which entered production earlier this week.

“If you can anticipate customer needs and expectations and deliver on those, the world’s an easier place and it’s a better place. That’s good for us,” Majoros told AN at this week’s Chicago Auto Show. “It’s good for dealers and good for customers. If we can take that approach and cascade it across all of our models, which we’re starting to do, I think that’s a positive thing.”

Edwards may best be remembered for the “Real People, Not Actors” campaign, which featured — among other scenarios — telegenic strangers attempting to identify the make of a partially concealed Chevrolet vehicle. The “real people” were quick to misidentify mainstream Chevy sedans as big-bucks imports.

YouTube soon became home to a series of parodies titled “ If ‘Real People’ Commercials Were Real Life…,” starring a Bostonian protagonist named Mahk.

Edwards shrugged off the criticism, telling Ad Age in 2017, “In the last 25 months we have learned a tremendous amount, not only on the campaign equities itself and how to fine tune it and keep it fresh, but also on the power of focus and alignment and consistency over time.”

The “Real people” ads were young at heart and didn’t take themselves too seriously, Edwards said, adding that it delivered instant brand recognition among viewers. That was something missing from Chevrolet marketing efforts for some time, he said.

[Image: Chevrolet/YouTube]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 30 comments
  • Fleuger99 Fleuger99 on Feb 10, 2020

    These ads are idiotic, like only people with half a brain would believe them. Best result of these ads, is Mark channel on YT who makes endless fun of them. Check it out.

  • Pathfinderdoorhandle Pathfinderdoorhandle on Feb 10, 2020

    Mahk is funny, and again, he's NOT from Boston but he does the best fake accent I've ever heard! The Hyundai Super Bowl ad on the other hand, apparently created with the assumption that the Patriots would be in the game, features typical Hollywood-style Boston accents. Not even close. Cliff Clavin's was better.

  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonymous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
Next