GM Downplays Virus Threat to Lucrative Truck Lines

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

We’re not talking about a digital threat here; no, it’s more just one more headache caused by the viral outbreak rampaging through the Chinese manufacturing heartland — the source of so many components crucial to domestic auto production.

At General Motors, a supply chain disruption is the last thing the company needs after weathering an expensive 40-day strike at its U.S. plants last fall. The automaker is now attempting to allay fears of idled plants in the wake of an ominous social media post.

As reported by Bloomberg, GM says the threat isn’t serious, suggesting it has other suppliers on the hook that could step in if necessary.

“We continue to monitor our supply chain and are in close communications with our tier-one suppliers to mitigate any risk to production in North America,” GM spokesman David Barnas said in an email to the publication. “The situation is still quite fluid, but GM, other automakers and suppliers have begun the process of restarting vehicle and parts production in China.”

The comment came after a UAW local representing workers at GM’s Flint, Michigan truck plant posted to social media, warning of potential production snags at truck and SUV plants in Flint, Arlington, Texas, and Fort Wayne, Indiana if parts shortages continue. The situation would be especially worrisome if supply doesn’t ramp up by March, the post said.

The message to members of UAW Local 598 reportedly stemmed from a report from the automaker’s materials department.

“However, if this continues in March, there will be more significant parts impacted. The first being trailer harnesses. The company is still trying to develop a process to run shy and still pass PTT and DVT,” the post stated, as reported by The Detroit Bureau.

“The company has leased two cargo planes and also been able to get the government to release two of them. They are hoping to improve shipments. The company has set Flint has a priority plant and will sacrifice volume at Arlington and Fort Wayne to keep us running.”

The three plants crank out key product for GM: full-size Chevrolet Silverados and GMC Sierras, as well as the company’s body-on-frame, full-size SUVs. Those SUVs were just revealed in next-generation guise; production has already begun ahead of a mid-2020 on-sale date.

Earlier this week, GM announced that its joint-venture plants in China would restart on February 15th, following extended downtime caused first by the Lunar New Year holiday, then by the virus.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Golden2husky Golden2husky on Feb 15, 2020

    The reality is that all manufacturers are going to source from the cheapest place unless there is some mechanism in place to prevent it from happening. There are no scared cows in the consumer product market because price drives everything. The consumer had plenty of time to buy the fryer made in West Bend Indiana instead of the cheaper Chinese made one that sat next to it on the shelf back in the day. Overwhelmingly they opted for the lower price model so today West Bend is economically dead. What is really sad is when the item you buy is packed with components from abroad and the assembled here, yet it still comes with an exorbitant price tag. Looking at you Harley-Davisdson...

  • Dusterdude Dusterdude on Feb 15, 2020

    @gasser I wouldn't worry about corona virus coming from ocean containers .... The worry with COVID-19 is a significant spread in direct person to person transmission. As noted in the media some possible scenarios are pretty severe.. Hopefully they don't play out as they would be much more devastating than worrying about manufacturing plants shutting down..

  • E I get that TTAC has a strong anti EV bias but this article is quite a reach. For GM and Ford to pressure their suppliers to cut costs is business as usual. It would be bigger news if they told suppliers not to worry about costs and to keep raising prices on parts.
  • Master Baiter Consumers should have the right to purchase products from other countries if they are better or cheaper than domestic alternatives. However, retaining the capacity to manufacture goods is also in the national interest. I don't have the answer.
  • Tom Frank …hit up a Ford or Lincoln dealer to have the vehicle software updated to the latest version…But isn’t the latest version the reason for the recall? I’d like last month’s software, please. That version worked.
  • Pig_Iron Many, many moons ago in in my macro economics class, they preached to us from upon high that "free trade" is the only way to go. Period. End of discussion. So free trade spread across North America and deindustrialization swept the land. Employment in good paying jobs with saving wages, health benefits, and decent pensions evaporated in the rush to offshore. But not to worry they said, the "knowledge economy" would replace it. But the knowledge proved even easier to offshore. Don't worry they said we are now a "service economy". But those jobs turned out to be little more than wage slavery. But don't worry they said. there's actually a labor shortage, so we'll throw the borders wide open to undocumented fighting age male migrants and turn a blind eye to others exploited in the process. And on top of all that, China has declared "unrestricted warfare" on us. So, you ask me if protectionism is a valid strategy to combat a flood of products on a markedly tilted playing field? Three guesses, first two don't count. ✌
  • THX1136 I don't view Chinese products as being all that much better. For me they are the new 'made in Japan' which, when I was a kid, was an indicator of poor quality, not exceptional as they became. Case in point, look at the cheap (meaning poorly made) items that make up over 60% (conservatively) of what's on the shelf at retailers such as Wally World. I would agree allowing them in without much todo would in theory push others to do better. I feel that is only sometimes the case. AND, it's an election year so there is tons o'posturing on both sides.
Next