'I Do': Fiat Chrysler, PSA Sign Binding Merger Agreement

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Regulatory and shareholder approvals will take some time, but the pending merger between Fiat Chrysler and France’s PSA Group is now chiseled in stone. The two automakers signed a binding combination agreement on Wednesday, positioning their respective companies for a 50:50 tie-up and the creation of the world’s third-largest automaker (by revenue).

Going by sales would make it the fourth-largest.

The move comes after the French government, which owns 12 percent of PSA, gave the deal ther green light, with the Peugeot family offering its own thumbs-up.

Headquartered in The Netherlands, the combined entity — once fully meshed — will span the globe, drawing 46 percent of its revenue from Europe and 43 percent from North America. The companies are aiming for $4.1 billion in annual savings achieved through platform and technology sharing, with two vehicle platforms (small and compact/midsize) expected to account for two-thirds of its volume.

One-time costs associated with the merger total $3.1 billion.

Broken down, FCA and PSA see tech- and platform-related synergies as making up 40 percent of the combined entity’s cost savings, with another 40 percent derived from purchasing. Marketing, IT, and logistics will make up the remaining 20 percent.

Helming the whole operation will be PSA CEO Carlos Tavares, who’ll hold a seat on the 11-person board. Term length is five years. In the group chairman seat is FCA Chairman John Elkann. The agreement stipulates that no shareholder will be able to exercise more than 30 percent of the votes cast at the entity’s shareholder meetings.

“Carlos Tavares, Mike Manley and their executive teams have a strong track record in successfully turning around companies and combining OEMs with diverse cultures,” the automakers said in a joint statement. “This experience will support the speed of execution of the merger, underpinned by the companies’ strong recent performances and already robust balance sheets. The merged entity will maneuver with speed and efficiency in an automotive industry undergoing rapid and fundamental changes.”

Key to ensuring French support for the deal was the assurance that no assembly plants would be mothballed as a result of the merger; both companies anticipate positive cash flow starting in Year One.

In a letter to employees seen by Reuters, FCA CEO Mike Manley told employees to remain focused on the business of selling Jeeps and Rams, saying, “We have aggressive goals and high expectations to meet as FCA well into 2020. Let’s deliver them all.”

He added that the binding agreement signed Wednesday kicks off “an extended process of regulatory and shareholder approvals which could take from 12 to 15 months.”

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • Indi500fan Indi500fan on Dec 18, 2019

    I'm thinking the Citroen Hellcat Stinkeye Narrowbody is gonna be HUGE in Europe....

  • Pete Zaitcev Pete Zaitcev on Dec 19, 2019

    When was the last time anyone at FCA was able to design a car? Gulia, right? In the U.S., the only thing they managed to make was the JL. But before that, it was Mitsubishi DS platform, then the old E-series, then Dart, then Renegade -- all imported. If not a BOF, the last time they did anything was PT (Cruiser), based on PL 2K (Neon).

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next