QOTD: You Knew This Was Coming…

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Forgive us for this post, one which yet again delves into a vehicle that, for good or bad, came in like the proverbial wrecking ball. Busted up the joint. People are abuzz, and so is Adam, whose opinions on the Ford Mustang Mach-E flowed like water through a breached dam on Monday.

Again and again (and not just from Adam) a hypothetical scenario reared its head — what if the Mustang Mach-E emerged from behind the curtain wearing another badge?

There’s only one other badge it could wear, as this isn’t an anything-goes exercise. It’s Lincoln. Keep the overall design almost entirely the same, obviously minus the ‘Stang-derived taillights and embryonic grille, throw on a Lincoln badge, and call the thing the Mark E.

Inquiring minds asked for an image, and Twitter provided:

Here’s a two minute attempt. pic.twitter.com/iaYnA8a5CK

— Matthew (@Plays_With_Cars) November 18, 2019

Compelling? Some thought so. Now, this ‘solution’ is only really a solution for those offended by the creation of a “Mustang family” in the first place — a family of which an electric, four-door crossover is now a member. Black sheep or red-headed stepchild, many would say.

Listen, as we’ve stated before, the transformation of a boring “compliance” EV of unflattering proportions into a sport-oriented, musclebound electric that kicks eco-justice messaging to the background is not a bad thing. If Ford wanted to make money off the thing, and that is its intent, the makeover was necessary. “I want to buy this” is a better sales motivator than “I should probably be buying this.”

And yet even shaplier curves and added grunt wasn’t seen as a sure-fire remedy. We’re talking EVs here; Ford doesn’t have the dedicated — and quite rabid — fan base Tesla enjoys. Ford can’t fall back on its “disruptor/tech adopter” status among those who line up outside the Apple store for their biannual phone purchase. And so the Mustang name was sacrificed, many would claim, in order to give the upcoming model a much-needed PR and mojo boost. Hell, we wouldn’t be talking about it if the crossover emerged under the name “EcoSport-E.” Lampooning it, perhaps…

While accepting that Ford’s EV clearly needed the combined might of all the King’s horses and all the King’s men to stand a chance of making it, the branding is still an acrimonious thing. Slap on a Lincoln badge, and the problem almost entirely disappears. While the Lincoln Mark series, minus the MK. VI, was strictly a coupe affair, the blowback wouldn’t have been nearly as immediate and venomous had Ford introduced a Lincoln Mark E Sunday night.

And it may have hit the market with a thud, regardless of its attributes (time will tell how the Mach-E fares on that score). After all, to get an invite to the big dance, first you have to get noticed.

So, with this in mind, do you think Ford would have been better off launching this crossover as a Lincoln? Okay, now throw dollars and cents into the equation. Do you still feel the same way?

[Image: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 60 comments
  • Matt51 Matt51 on Nov 19, 2019

    Ford..is..Stupid. Won't sell, won't get their invested money back, young people won't be able to afford it.

  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Nov 19, 2019

    They could call it the Musk Oxcart, or The Streetcar Named Desire, for all I care. It doesn't fit my driving needs yet so I won't be gnashing my teeth too greatly.

  • VoGhost Interesting. The maga anti-America crowd is so used to being brainwashed into hating Tesla, they didn't realize that it's actually the foreign automakers that use slave labor.
  • SilverHawk 2031: A Car Odessey"Car, Let me have the steering wheel."'Sorry John. I can't do that.'
  • Bouzouki Hmm. So, can this system detect the root cause of why the driver may be having a "bad day"?Can the system detect when the driver is leaving a GM dealership after an expensive repair (or maintenance, like clearing the carbon deposits on the intake valves of that direct-injected "affordable" 3-cylinder Trax for $1200), or when GM certified says "sorry, that's not covered in your "LIMITED Bumper-to-bumper warranty"?I wonder.Those experiences can make drivers angry and upset.
  • Sobhuza Trooper How Can Unions Break Through in the South?Next up: How can cancer tumors grow, despite chemo and radiation therapy.
  • 1995 SC So with a lease the better the car holds it's value then the better you come out since the lease is basically paying the depreciation over the terms of the lease, correct? Assuming it isn't a factory subsidized lease to move a bunch of turds anyway. So if one isn't sure if the company is going to be around lease end, wouldn't that kill the residual and make these bad lease deals (or worse than a lease on something known to hold it's value)? I've always looked at leases as something companies that needed vehicles did.
Next