Not Quite a Recall: Ford Extends Transmission Warranty for DSP6

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ford took some heat after reports emerged that it was well aware of the issues plaguing the PowerShift transmission found in third-gen Focuses and sixth-gen Fiestas. While the automaker has issued numerous recalls on the vehicles in question, the transmission was never officially included. Instead, Ford provided impacted owners with extended warranties on the problematic DSP6 tranny and issued a software update.

Hoping to quell public outrage, the manufacturer said on Wednesday that it will stretch the warranty on certain 2014-16 model year Focus and Fiesta vehicles by two years and 40,000 miles. It also announced that software updates are incoming for customers who found the six-speed dual clutch a nonstop headache. While not quite a recall, it puts Ford on the hook for transmission repairs some customers had to pay for out of pocket.

Unfortunately, we know of several individuals who got burned by Ford’s last warranty extension. In 2014, the company pulled the same move for 2011-2013 model year vehicles — extending transmission warranties from five years/60,000 miles to seven years/100,000. Meanwhile, transmission control modules are covered up to 10 years/150,000 miles with the factory saying it’ll go six months beyond if one goes on the fritz. However, it was not unheard-of for customers to see their gearboxes simply implode immediately after the 100,000-mile cutoff.

The same may be true here. Still, Ford claims the software updates have improved issues associated with the troubled transmission dramatically, especially in vehicles produced after the start of 2015. “Based on internal and external data, Focus and Fiesta vehicles with automatic transmissions built since the second half of 2015 — and earlier models that have received component and software updates — perform well and have competitive levels of satisfaction,” said Dave Filipe, Vice President of Ford’s Powertrain Engineering, in a statement.

“Ford understands and regrets that many customers have been inconvenienced and frustrated by the performance of the DPS6 transmission. Earning and keeping the trust of customers is vital to everything we do. That is why Ford and its dealers have gone to great lengths to improve the performance of the transmission.”

After issuing nearly two-dozen technical service bulletins related to the DSP6 since 2010, a recall wouldn’t have been out of the question. Yet Ford’s been just proactive enough to get away with this. If it can keep customers happy and put some distance between itself and these aging models, it might avoid having to pay out more than it already has.

Ford is currently involved in litigation with Focus/Fiesta consumers hoping to be reimbursed. The proposed settlement is presently pending in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in California. Meanwhile, the company is on the hook for 165,000 additional vehicles (16 percent of the U.S. total) that need their software updated and a couple more years worth of repairs. Estimates as to how much this will impact Ford’s bottom line should be reflected in its next quarterly report.

Filipe capped off his remarks by reiterating how Ford regrets any inconvenience caused to affected customers while also mentioning that DSP6-equipped vehicles “always were and remain safe to drive.”

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Aug 14, 2019

    "Earning and keeping the trust of customers is vital to everything we do. That is why Ford and its dealers have gone to great lengths to improve the performance of the transmission." No, this action was taken when Ford ran out of ways to weasel out of taking responsibility for their screw up.

  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Aug 15, 2019

    Will the extended warranties still apply if you are not the original owner? Otherwise, the resell values will simply hit the bottom.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next