Crawling Back? Renault Still Eager to Merge With Fiat Chrysler, Report Claims

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The proposed merger between two auto giants — Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles — went nowhere earlier this year, but the door to the deal never swung fully shut. That’s according to a report in the Wall Street Journal, in which sources claim talks are ongoing to rekindle the romance.

FCA snatched away its offer in June after the French government, which owns 15 percent of Renault, intruded into discussions, citing a need to have alliance partner Nissan fully on board. The Japanese automaker, embroiled in scandal and a serious financial slump, kept its distance from those earlier talks, offering polite but unenthusiastic public support as reports emerged of concerns about its autonomy and shrinking influence under such a marriage.

To get the deal back on track, Renault would need to loosen its ties with Nissan.

According to the WSJ report, Nissan wants to even out the lopsided relationship between it and its alliance partner. Sources with knowledge of the talks — apparently ongoing since June — say the Japanese automaker wants Renault to cuts its 43.4 percent stake in the company.

While Nissan holds a 15-percent stake in Renault, it does not enjoy the voting rights afforded to Renault. However, before Renault can partly divest itself of Nissan, the French government would first have to give a thumbs-up. In earlier discussions with FCA, France sought assurances related to plant locations and employment numbers.

In withdrawing its proposal, FCA claimed it had “become clear that the political conditions in France do not currently exist for such a combination to proceed successfully.”

Talks between the two automakers are expected to last through the end of the year, with the possibility of a memorandum of understanding related to an alliance restructuring signed by next month, sources claim. As you’d expect, no one at Nissan or Renault have anything to say to the media.

Under FCA’s proposal, the 50:50 merger, valued at $35 billion, would mean the creation of the world’s third-largest auto company and potentially lead to $5.6 billion in annual efficiencies, or so FCA claimed. The Italian-American company’s chairman, John Elkann, would reprise his role, with Renault CEO Jean-Dominique Senard likely serving as CEO. Overseen by an 11-member board, the new entity would be structured through a Dutch holding company.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 26 comments
  • SatelliteView SatelliteView on Aug 04, 2019

    Why has it become so prohibitively expensive to build cars that mega giants have to unite with other mega giants?

    • See 1 previous
    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Aug 04, 2019

      There's massive overcapacity in the industry, and mergers provide cover for those mentioned "efficiencies" - shutting down excess assembly, engine, transmission, and parts plants. Without a merger, companies face too many political and public relations hurdles that prevent them from slimming down, short of bleeding red ink.

  • Conundrum Conundrum on Aug 05, 2019

    Renault used to book over $500 million annually in dividends from its 43% holding of Nissan. Who'd want to give that up? But then Nissan got Ghosn in trouble and all of a sudden, its profits in Qtrs 1 and 2 in 2019 vanished into thin air as well. So no juicy dividends going to Renault any more. Coincidence? Nissan is perfectly capable of ruining itself by itself, new Versas notwithstanding, and perhaps it really is struggling, but going essentially profitless is a great way to get your majority stakeholder off your back and looking for better opportunities elsewhere. It's a cunning plan that may result in Nissan slitting its own throat before it recovers and sees it itself for what it really is - a second tier automotive company but independent enough to be proud of its mediocrity.

    • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Aug 06, 2019

      Committing seppuku is the most honorable way to get off the stranglehold of mean Gaijins. As Mark would say: I can feel the hand of a stranger And it's tightening around my throat Heaven help me, Heaven help me Take this stranger from my boat.

  • ToolGuy This thing here is interesting.For example, I can select "Historical" and "EV stock" and "Cars" and "USA" and see how many BEVs and PHEVs were on U.S. roads from 2010 to 2023."EV stock share" is also interesting. Or perhaps you prefer "EV sales share".If you are in the U.S., whatever you do, do not select "World" in the 'Region' dropdown. It might blow your small insular mind. 😉
  • ToolGuy This podcast was pretty interesting. I listened to it this morning, and now I am commenting. Listened to the podcast, now commenting on the podcast. See how this works? LOL.
  • VoGhost If you want this to succeed, enlarge the battery and make the vehicle in Spartanburg so you buyers get the $7,500 discount.
  • Jeff Look at the the 65 and 66 Pontiacs some of the most beautiful and well made Pontiacs. 66 Olds Toronado and 67 Cadillac Eldorado were beautiful as well. Mercury had some really nice looking cars during the 60s as well. The 69 thru 72 Grand Prix were nice along with the first generation of Monte Carlo 70 thru 72. Midsize GM cars were nice as well.The 69s were still good but the cheapening started in 68. Even the 70s GMs were good but fit and finish took a dive especially the interiors with more plastics and more shared interiors.
  • Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
Next