2019 Kia K900 Review - Recommended Daily Value

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn
Fast Facts

2019 Kia K900 Luxury

3.3-liter twin-turbocharged V6 (365 hp @ 6000 rpm, 376 lb/ft. @ 1300 rpm)
Eight-speed automatic transmission, all-wheel drive
18 city / 25 highway / 21 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
19.8 (observed mileage, MPG)
Base Price
$$60,895 US
As Tested
$$64,895 US
Prices include $995 destination charge in the United States. K900 not available in Canada

I’m not quite to the tin foil hat stage, but I’m certain that Google’s ad servers have their cameras trained on me. No, I didn’t get caught up in that face aging app nonsense a couple weeks ago — and I’m not one for selfies. Rather, I’m sure I’m being watched, as with every new gray hair that sprouts on my beard, I seem to get more advertisements for products meant to help with aging.

From retirement planning advice, to literal beard dying products, to (ahem) virility potions and devices, there seems to be no end to the market reminders that I’m much closer to the dirt nap than I am to a nap in a crib. And the vitamin ads never stop.

Maybe this 2019 Kia K900 is yet another solution to my advanced years, with comfort and luxury meant to coddle my aching back. But I like to think of it as one of those once a day vitamins. It’s easy to use, just like a simple daily pill — but like that pill, you don’t think about it much when you’re done swallowing it. And, again like the daily dose, it’s forgettable for Kia, who sold roughly one K900 per day last year.

Not at all kidding. Per GoodCarBadCar, Kia moved 354 of their flagship luxury sedans in the 2018 calendar year, or fewer than one a day. The answer to why seems quite simple — it’s some mixture of unfamiliarity alongside the traditional misconception of Kia as nothing more than a budget brand. Really, have you seen a commercial or banner ad talking about the K900?

It’s a shame, really, as Kia leverages the value message nicely with this car. Other than a couple port-installed options like floor mats and wheel locks, the only option available on the K900 is the $4,000 VIP package, which adds a wide 12.3-inch infotainment screen that can display three functions at once — it looks like I had weather and a list of presets flanking the current song when I took these photos, though navigation is one of the options, and can be shuffled around the screen as you see fit.

Further, The VIP package adds 14-way power adjustment to the passenger seat, and 12-way power adjustments to the rear seats, as well as seat cooling ventilation to those rear chairs. Better still for those being chauffeured, a rear-seat wireless charging pad is in that VIP package as well. Try adding all of those bits to a European luxury sedan — the window sticker will groan under the weight of all the added ink.

A brilliant use of the LCD screen that makes up the driver’s gauge cluster is a screen showing a live view of the blind spot while the turn signal is activated. When the right signal is clicking, the display shows to the right in place of the tachometer, and when the left signal is on, it moves to the left where the speedo would sit. It’s intuitive, it’s clear, and it’s a great way to add a touch of safety. It’s a feature that’s trickling to more of the Kia lineup, but I’m enamored with this.

It’s also a feature that’s hard to photograph well, since it doesn’t work when the transmission is in park. Some jurisdictions might consider any handheld mobile device use in a car a violation, even while sitting at a light. So, take this cell photo with that caveat.

The interior is beautifully appointed, with plush leather seats the rival of anything in the class, and an optional suede headliner (part of that VIP package) adding a touch of bling. That said, it’s not exciting. If you want to be dazzled by crystal-clad shift levers and carpets deep enough to require a lifeguard, this is not your ride. It is, for better or worse, a Kia. It’s an Optima or a Cadenza with a bit more room and nicer materials. The controls are as simple to understand as you’d find in a Sportage.

Sadly, the exterior keeps up that “just another Kia” image. It doesn’t exactly stand out, even though the absurdly-low production numbers might lead you to think otherwise. Especially in this refrigerator white, it’s handsome but anonymous.

From the front, I’m reminded a bit of the Euro-market Ford Scorpio of the mid-Nineties. If you don’t recall that one, finish your lunch before googling it. The K900 is done much better, but the resemblance in the bulbous headlamps is especially hard to unsee. And, yes, I know I need to do a better job of washing off the dead insects.

Driving the K900 is surprising, as one would expect something powered by the Stinger’s twin-turbo V6 to be a bit more swift in operation. This bigger platform definitely swings the performance/luxury pendulum well to the plush side. The power, while plentiful, doesn’t make the big Kia sprightly. The suspension is well damped, but the steering is numb. It’s not a driver’s car, by any means — it’s a car for arriving refreshed rather than invigorated.

At my age, I’m beginning to see the appeal of maintaining the status quo. So a daily supplement that threatens to keep my joints relatively limber and my organs in roughly the right places is intriguing. The Kia K900, similarly, will not raise the heartbeat, but it will deliver the recommended daily dose of luxury and value.

[Images: © 2019 Chris Tonn]

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 87 comments
  • Cprescott Cprescott on Jul 29, 2019

    Listening to many, Kia and Hyundai (via Genesis) should never venture from cheapness because so many fools buy to flaunt their vanity (there is a youtube vlog about a guy who flaunts his Ferrari and modified his f-150 to the point of looking ghastly black on every inch and it is also gaudy loud). I don't need a car to flaunt anything. I buy the best I can for the price and if I get a bargain while enjoying the vehicle, then I'm even more pleased. I don't care if this car is but 90% of a Mercedes. I love the luxury and will gladly have the rest of you think I'm a schmuck. Don't expect a ride.

  • Sweetspud Sweetspud on Sep 11, 2019

    As an owner of a 2019 K900, I can honestly say everyone who rides in my car is impressed by the ride and level of luxury in a Kia most have never heard of. I didn't buy it to impress friends or strangers, I bought it to get a great ride with loads of luxury and a great warranty for the minimum cost. I am old enough to not care what emblem is on my car, a prestige emblem won't save me money, deliver a luxury experience, or make me care if anyone sees it on my car.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next