Ace of Base: 2019 Hyundai Santa Fe SE

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

In all the years we’ve been presenting this series, Ace of Base has never focused on what was Hyundai’s first stepping stone into the world of crossovers and SUVs: the Santa Fe. Let’s correct that oversight with this new-for-2019 model.

To be clear, this is the two-row model, not the three-row which currently has an “XL” suffix appended to its name. That machine will vanish when the new Palisade appears later this year. Whatever it’s called, Hyundai sells a lot of ‘em; there must be a reason for that, right?

There is indeed. As is the Koreans’ wont, value-for-money is high on the Santa Fe’s checklist, even in this fourth-gen model that’s been pushed upscale ever so slightly. Hyundai has ladled on the trim levels lately, to which the new Santa Fe is no exception. The base model is called the SE and starts at a reasonable $25,750.

Under the hood is a 185 horsepower 2.4-liter four banger hooked to an eight-speed automatic transmission. It’s front-drive at this price; sending power to all four wheels will cost an extra $1,700. Its capable of hauling 2,000 lbs, enough to allow a small utility trailer laden with a lightweight ATV. Those 17-inch alloys riding on 235/65R17 tires aren’t the smallest things in the world, so be sure to budget for rubber replacement or winter tire fittings.

Driving nannies? There’s a full load of them, even on this base model. Lane keeping is kind of expected these days, but the big H goes ahead and bakes in the likes of collision avoidance assists and pedestrian detection systems for good measure. This was S-Class stuff not too long ago, let alone something to be found on a $25,000 Hyundai.

LED lights pepper the exterior, though the base SE announces your tightwad ways by omitting fog lights from the equation. At least the side mirrors are body color, and there’s all manner of chrome accents on the front grille. No fewer than nine shades of paint are on offer, each causing various interior colors to vanish and reappear. My choice is the craftily-named Stormy Sea paired with black chairs.

Speaking of seats, they’re of the unheated manual variety in this base trim. There is power lumbar support. You’ll also have to dig a key out of your pocket and twist it in the ignition to set the 2.4L alight. Beyond those oversights, however, the SE treats its occupants to a raft of USB ports, A/C, smart cruise control, and Apple CarPlay.

The small items missing from the SE are found in the SEL, costing an extra two grand. I’d choose the cheap seats and pocket the difference.

[Images: Hyundai]

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments and feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The model above is shown with American options and priced in American Dollars. Your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 41 comments
  • Conundrum Conundrum on May 29, 2019

    The archetypal blob crossover. Anonymous and built to stay that way.

  • Slavuta Slavuta on May 29, 2019

    I was interested to read this review because I drove this... POS. You take away nannies (for those who needs them) and this car is such bad execution. The only thing that goes for it, I like the size. Horrible interior finishing and materials. Everything feels soooooo cheaaaap. Switch gear is bleh. Honestly, driving this car ruined my mood for rest of the day. First, when you drive it, you don't feel that you drive an SUV, the sitting is pretty low. Also, the nannies are so aggressive. I tried to cut the curve and this car was really taking steering out of me, fighting me. My new Highlander also has lane keep assist but I can easily overtake the computer if I need to make evasive maneuver. Santa Fe was dragging me into trouble. But this is the interior that killed it for me. As you might see, I paid nearly $10K more to have engine power and better interior, and definitely not to drive Santa Fe, even if I don't need 3rd row.

    • See 3 previous
    • Slavuta Slavuta on Jun 03, 2019

      bd2, this is bulloney. Speaking of base vs base Fe has no chance in interior quality vs Highlander. They placed it 17th without spelling the reason for it. But I can imagine, this is not interior quality, driveability or performance. Value is the key-word here. Im not kind person who likes to spend extra for a badge. If Fe was close to 'Lander, I would buy that car. But it wasn't. This is the point where I care less what CR says. They can tell me that Corolla is a great car - I am not driving that! I don't mean that 'Lander is best out there, I don't know what is. But its smallish size, power, and discounts made me happy.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next