Ace of Base: 2020 Toyota Supra

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

This one is sure to set tongues wagging and keyboards clacking. The return of the mighty Supra nameplate is — depending to whom you speak — either an abomination the likes of which the motoring world has never seen, or a wonderful harbinger of all things fun and sporty.

For the record, your author is in the latter camp. Don’t @ me.

Three trims of the are new Supra available at launch: Base 3.0, Premium 3.0, and a Launch Edition. Is the entry-level model worth a mention? Or should one proceed directly to one of the more expensive options?

The initial 1500 production Supras for the U.S. market will be Launch Edition models, prices at $55,250 and uniquely numbered with a carbon-fiber badge bearing the likeness of Akio Toyoda’s signature. Snazzy. But beyond any initial exclusivity, there is a better value to be had.

Base 3.0 models are priced at $49,990. I can think of a good many go-fast parts from a burgeoning aftermarket for this car that could be bought with the $5,260 price difference. All Supra coupes are powered by a 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six engine that produces 335 hp and 365 lb-ft of torque and is mated to an eight-speed automatic transmission. Paying extra to the dealers nets you naught in terms of extra power. Entry-level models are also endowed with adaptive suspension, an active rear differential, and launch control.

Sticking with the base car essentially means forgoing a set of leather seats and snazzier infotainment. If you can live without wireless Apple CarPlay, you’ll be just fine. A 12-speaker JBL audio system only serves to add weight anyway, right? Right.

And, yes, I’m well aware base Supra coupes will have different rims than the car in the snappy media image shown in today’s post. Unkind remarks about the Supra’s design, especially around its mouth, should be checked until one sees the thing with their own two eyes. In person, its lines and proportions work together wonderfully.

A raft of safety kit appears on the cheapest Supra. Standard features include the likes of forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, lane departure nannies, and automatic high beams. An $1,195 Driver Assist package adds adaptive cruise and the like. Leave it on the table.

Like it or lump it, the new Supra is here. All the Luddites decrying it as a tarted-up BMW are severely missing the point and should be forced to daily commute a Trabant for the next six months. As a statement of intent, the new Supra is a dandy. Combined with the 86, I think we are currently enjoying the best Toyota showroom in ages.

Feel free to yell at me in the comments. But you’ll still be wrong.

[Images: Toyota]

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make our automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you’d like to see in our series? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The model above is shown with American options and is priced in Freedom Dollars. As always, your dealer will probably sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 62 comments
  • Gglockster Gglockster on Feb 20, 2019

    I'm pretty much "done" with BMW. As much as I like BMW's I6, the electronic nightmare BMW calls a car has me throwing in the towel. I'm interested in this car. I'd like to see how it rides and how reliable it is. Assuming I can fit my 6' frame in comfort and it reflects Toyota reliability, it at least makes my short list. Sure, I'd like a stick and a car of beauty. I'm ok with sacrificing this since I'm on the inside and not gawking on the outside. Also at least I'm driving the car instead of some AI.

  • Gedrven Gedrven on Feb 22, 2019

    Ace of base? This aces nothing. I'll reserve esthetic judgment, fine, but I have no reservations about deriding this thing as obese, lazy, and irrelevant. Two pedals, the bigger of which is redundant since the car will brake when it feels like it anyway, and 3400 pounds? In a two-seat RWD sports car with an aluminum 3-liter engine? I know there are mandatory safety standards, but surely this goes above and beyond, straight into the realm of bad engineering. I pity a generation of gearheads who grow up thinking that this is what a performance car is supposed to be. FT86 was one answer to a particular market demand, hamstrung by a lack of power. This is another answer, fixing the power problem but inexplicably adding two bigger ones. Maybe they'll get it right on the third try? We want power *and* driver involvment. Treat the 86 like the 80's Celica: stretch it a bit and give it a turbo flat-6, but for Pete's sake keep it under 3k (86 is ~2800; this should be doable) and with 3 pedals.

  • Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
Next