Valeo Previews 'Invisible' Trailer System at CES 2019

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

With so many bewildering and downright fantastical automotive concepts premiering at the Consumer Electronics Show this time of year, it’s easy to feel downtrodden by the industry’s mobility shenanigans. Thankfully, CES still plays host to some genuinely interesting tech that might actually make your life a little easier.

For French automotive supplier Valeo, that meant showcasing a system that utilizes cameras and some very careful framing to effectively see through a towed object. Called the XtraVue Trailer system, the technology works in a similar fashion as the nanotechnology invisibility blanket under development by the U.S. military — just much simpler.

Rather than use an elaborate projective fabric that records and mimics whatever’s behind it, à la Predator, XtraVue uses traditional cameras fixed to the back of the vehicle and accompanying trailer and projects a composite image onto a large screen that’s easily visible to the driver.

By keying out areas obscured by the trailer, Valeo can effectively render it “invisible” to the person behind the wheel, creating downright sublime rearward visibility. Still, similar systems already exist on the market. Companies like Rear View Safety Inc. already offer dozens of solutions for those wanting a better sense of their surroundings whilst towing. What makes Valeo’s setup a little different is that its system creates a seemingly complete image when properly set up, even providing a basic outline of the trailer using a screen-within-a-screen effect.

XtraVue is supposed to work directly with a vehicle’s standard backup camera, using a secondary camera at the back of the trailer to fill in the gaps keyed out by the imaging software. We imagine the supplier wants to work directly with automakers to get this into factory vehicles, rather than take the aftermarket approach. However, the current demonstration does not have the system integrated into the car’s infotainment system.

Distortion will likely become a problem the larger and longer a trailer gets, at which point you might want to consider a multi-camera setup. But XtraVue looks impressive when used on a smaller rig. Based on footage provided but the supplier, we doubt spacial issues would only crop up in extremely tight quarters, but that’s a pretty inconsequential gripe considering the system will absolutely make towing safer.

Valeo also brought a couple of autonomous concepts to CES. One, a vehicle dubbed “Drive4U,” uses the company’s ultrasound, cameras, radars, and LiDAR systems in conjunction with artificial intelligence. While self-driving remains Drive4U’s ultimate goal, the supplier is also working on ways to control it from a distance. One of those is a remote control that syncs with the car’s functions, but an interesting alternative exists in the company’s Voyage XR, which creates a sort of virtual driving experience.

With Voyage XR, users can pop on a VR headset and manually control the car. It’s a fascinating concept, offering a potential glimpse into our very sedentary future.

Call us old fashioned if you must, but we’re slightly more fond of the invisible trailer idea.

[Images: Valeo]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 9 comments
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
  • FreedMike I don't think they work very well, so yeah...I'm afraid of them. And as many have pointed out, human drivers tend to be so bad that they are also worthy of being feared; that's true, but if that's the case, why add one more layer of bad drivers into the mix?
Next