QOTD: Ready to Throw a Shade of Green on Fiat Chrysler?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Yesterday brought two snippets of news concerning your tax dollars and lovers of virtuous cars. The first being an across-the-board price drop at Tesla aimed at countering the company’s reduced EV tax credit; the second, General Motors’ confirmation that time’s running out for the $7,500 bounty on its own vehicles.

Nissan’s next in line to cross the 200,000 vehicles threshold marking the beginning of the credit phaseout, followed by Ford and probably Toyota. Notice there’s no mention of Fiat Chrysler here. As of November, sales of qualifying vehicles at FCA amounted to just over 37,000 — meaning the brash automaker will likely enjoy government incentivization long after its rivals resort to limited manufacturer perks to stoke sales. $7,500 to serve as a big green bow placed atop any vehicle FCA dreams up.

And herein lies your job.

We’re not here to talk about the Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid — the automaker’s only legit mainstream electrified vehicle, nor the much-loathed Fiat 500e, so hated by late CEO Sergio Marchionne that the boss went out of his way to tell people not to buy it. Even the strongly rumored Chrysler Portal, an all-electric minivan or crossover built on the Pacifica platform, isn’t of interest here. No, your job is to envision what Chrysler could do with electrification.

If Mike Manley suddenly left Auburn Hills for an obscure Silicon Valley mobility startup, leaving you in the driver’s seat, what vehicle or vehicles would you want FCA designers to get to work on?

Last night, Adam Tonge jokingly suggested FCA’s pile of tax credits would best be kept in reserve until battery costs decline, allowing the company to offer the 2,000 lb-ft Ram Power Wagon Transformer at a bargain price. My thoughts fell along these lines, too. Performance applications. Big trucks with a green side, built to take on Ford. Maybe a 2021 Dodge Challenger or Charger, now riding a modified LX platform, with a bit of available battery assist to keep the archaic brutes viable in our clean, ultra-regulated future. There’s already a Jeep Wrangler PHEV in the works; why not a plug-in muscle car offering drivers a choice between Hemi and halo?

While it’s still unclear whether Waymo plans to make use of the tax credits offered on the 62,000 or so Pacifica Hybrids it plans to purchase from FCA — a move that would seriously restrict the number of full-sized incentives available to normal buyers — the company won’t run out tomorrow. What are your thoughts on where FCA’s green dollars should go?

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • APaGttH APaGttH on Jan 03, 2019

    When did Terrorist Tan become a truck color thing?!?!

  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Jan 04, 2019

    FCA should continue to do what they've been doing: offer a token hybrid and concentrate on ICE cars and trucks. That's what most Americans need to travel cheaply over long distances. Electric cars have their uses, but mostly in dense cities, where electrifying mass transit makes more sense. People who can't afford a car in those cities can use other car rental services when they need more than mass transit. FCA has been smart to leave the huge investments to its competitors while using its resources to create more Jeep models and update its halo RWD cars. The government credits for electrics can be taken away in an eyeblink by politicians, so investing heavily in electrics for that reason would be foolhardy.

  • 3-On-The-Tree They are hard to get in and out of. I also like the fact that they are still easy to work on with the old school push rod V8. My son’s 2016 Mustang GT exhaust came loose up in Tuscon so I put a harbor freight floor jack, two jack stands, tool box and two 2x4 in the back of the vette. So agreed it has decent room in the back for a sports car.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh so what?? .. 7.5 billion is not even in the same hemisphere as the utterly stupid waste of money on semiconductor fabs to the tune of more than 100 billion for FABS that CANNOT COMPETE in a global economy and CANNOT MAKE THE US Independent from China or RUSSIA. we REQUIRE China for cpu grade silicon and RUSSIA/Ukraine for manufacturing NEON gas for cpus and gpus and other silicon based processors for cars, tvs, phones, cable boxes ETC... so even if we spend trillion $ .. we STILL have to ask china permission to buy the cpu grade silicon needed and then buy neon gas to process the wafers.. but we keep tossing intel/Taiwan tens of billions at a time like a bunch of idiots.Google > "mining-and-refining-pure-silicon-and-the-incredible-effort-it-takes-to-get-there" Google > "silicon production by country statista" Google > "low-on-gas-ukraine-invasion-chokes-supply-of-neon-needed-for-chipmaking"
  • ToolGuy Clearly many of you have not been listening to the podcast.
  • 1995 SC This seems a bit tonedeaf.
  • 1995 SC Well I guess that will be the final nail in the Mini EV's coffin here. It was already not especially competitive, had no range and was way overpriced for what you get, but I like to get stuff like that used and well depreciated on occcasion though I likely would have passed anyway due to the Chinese manufacture.
Next