Ace of Base: 2018 Toyota 86

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

You bunch of ungrateful whelps. “Give us affordable rear-drive performance!” cried all hands, weeping at the thought of departed rear-drive funbags such as the MR2 and Corolla GT-S. Toyota, ever the dutiful servant, shacked up with Subaru to create the chuckable 2,700 lb sprite you see above.

And how’d you repay ‘em? By waiting for the things to show up on BHPH lots, that’s how! Ingrates. This is the car everyone wanted and then promptly forgot, as illustrated by the fact it is outsold more than 2:1 by the antiquated Sequoia.

My rage is manufactured and over the top, of course, as everyone’s seems to be these days. Still, the 86 is a great car, especially in base trim.

There are technically three trims of the 86: base, GT, and GT Black. All are powered by the 2.0-liter boxer-four, whose dimensions allow it to be slung low under the 86’s long hood, imbuing the sporty imp with a centre of gravity similar to that of Lowly Worm.

Base 86’s are priced at $26,850. For that sum, one will find good touch points inside the cabin, such as a leather-trimmed wheel that tilts and telescopes so drivers can get comfy prior to a bit of back road barn burning. In fact, Toyota goes through the trouble of specifically mentioning “knee support cushions for spirited driving,” indicating there are more than a few gearheads on both the engineering and marketing sides of the table.

Air conditioning is standard, of course, as are all manner of power motors for the doors and windows. Manually-adjusted seats keep the weight down. Remote keyless entry appears but a push-to-start is reserved for the GT, leaving base model owners suffering the indignity of twisting a, y’know, actual key in order to fire up the boxer engine.

It’s that mill which prompted the most carping from armchair critics, most of whom bleat that 205 horses and 156 lb-ft of twist isn’t enough powerrrrrr. An automatic transmission sucks up five horses, costs more, and should be avoided like the plague. It’s not a bad ‘box, but the spirit of this car is better suited to a stick. A six-speed manual transmission helps keep things on the boil while a Torsen limited-slip diff doles out power delivery at the rear.

Oddly, the only color on Toyota’s palette for which they charge a premium is white. Extroverted shades like Ablaze Red and Oceanic Blue are gratis, as are any number of greys. Beige is not available. In a presumed effort to keep a lid on costs, black fabric is the sole interior choice. Those cruising Toyota lots will learn a rear spoiler is a dead GT giveaway, as are fog lights up front. Neither are necessary; stick with this base car.

Toyota did rummage around in the engine a couple of years ago, finding those extra five horses (for manual cars, at least). The company reiterates that a turbo is not in the cards, saying the car’s architecture could not accommodate boost without negatively affecting its weight balance. The next-gen car may get a displacement bump to 2.4L. We’ll see.

The 86 enjoys robust aftermarket support. Intakes, exhausts, tunes, and the like are all available to those who feel their Toyobaru needs more oomph. A popular plug-n-play turbo kit, one of many, promises an extra 100 horses, giving the car a power-to-weight ratio not far off that of a Charger Hellcat. Springing for these treats will be all the easier for those who buy the cheaper base car.

Only 2,288 of these machines have been sold so far this year, a number roughly equal to how many Corollas are sold in two days. Like I said: buncha ingrates.

[Images: Toyota]

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selection.

The model above is shown in American dollars with American options and trim, absent of destination charges and available rebates. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 60 comments
  • Thejohnnycanuck Thejohnnycanuck on Jul 11, 2018

    It's a car! Sorry, wrong underpowered Toyota.

  • Lightspeed Lightspeed on Jul 12, 2018

    I worry for the Toyota/BMW team-up on the Supra, would much prefer Toyota reliability under the hood.

    • Noble713 Noble713 on Jul 12, 2018

      Rumors on the Supra MkV forum indicate that Toyota told BMW they wanted the engine to be good for ~700hp, so while the new Supra has a B58-based engine it uses the iron bottom end from the diesels in the family. I wasn't fond of hearing that as I think the B58 is a pretty stout closed-deck block (shops are making 600+hp stock internals) and I wanted an aluminum powerplant significantly lighter than a 2JZ......but it does indicate that Toyota is keeping high-power durability in mind. I wish they went over the Z4 with a fine-toothed comb, got the MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) for a bunch of BMW parts they didn't like, and then had Denso make their own versions that never break.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next