Junkyard Find: 1993 Isuzu Amigo

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin
The family tree of the Isuzu Faster pickup, best known in North America as the Chevrolet LUV, developed a thick branch of models that included some decent-selling SUVs. The two-door Amigo was the first of these to hit our shores.Here’s a high-mile example spotted in a San Francisco Bay Area self-service wrecking yard.
This Amigo is a rear-wheel-drive model with five-speed manual and air conditioning. Its California smog-check records show passed biennial emissions tests going back to the middle 1990s, so it appears to have been a reliable commuter machine, racking up more than 10,000 Golden State highway miles each year.
The Amigo’s four-door big brother, the Rodeo, could be had with a GM 3.1-liter V6 in 1993, but Amigo drivers had to accept the 119-horse, 2.6-liter straight-four.
It’s vaguely outdoorsy-looking, but it’s likely nearly all of its miles were spent in stop-and-go traffic on the deteriorating tarmac of California’s roads. Part of the reason for the death of the manual transmission in the American market is the preference for as little left-leg activity as possible during an 11-mile/90-minute commute, but the driver(s) of this car lived with the five-speed. In any case, the Amigo had a sportier image than, say, a 1993 Honda Del Sol, and perhaps that eased the pain of those hundreds of thousands of 0.75 mph clutch applications.
The interior and cloth top are in pretty good condition, indicating that this Amigo’s owner or owners garaged it for most of its life. I didn’t see any major crash damage, so an expensive mechanical failure is the likely culprit that doomed this truck.
The first-generation Amigo was sold in the United States for the 1989 through 1995 model years (it returned in 1998), and this retro commercial riffs on the brain-scrambling Slinky ads of two decades earlier.
Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 40 comments
  • NoGoYo NoGoYo on Dec 19, 2017

    A 2.6 liter 4 with 119 horsepower in a vehicle from 1993 sounds like a complete dog, to be honest...

  • THX1136 THX1136 on Dec 20, 2017

    Out of curiosity: Is it normal for an owner to not remove the plates on a vehicle destined for a wrecking yard? I was surprised to see the front plate on the passenger seat and the rear plate looking as though it was "ripped" off the rear (instead of just removing the mounting screws holding it on). We get a credit if we turn in plates from a vehicle that is being disposed of in this manner (or at least we used to).

    • See 1 previous
    • Bullnuke Bullnuke on Dec 20, 2017

      California plates stay with the car from first owner to the crusher, or at least that was the rule when I lived out there.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next