Midsize Sedan Deathwatch #16: The Decline of the Midsize Class's Middle Class

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Ever more minor midsize players continued to see their share of America’s midsize sedan segment dwindle in September 2017. The cause: domination on the part of America’s two major midsize cars.

The all-new 2018 Toyota Camry enjoyed its first full month of meaningful availability in September and produced a 13-percent year-over-year U.S. sales improvement as a result. Meanwhile, Honda is clearing out remaining 2017 Accords in advance of the all-new 2018 Accord’s arrival this fall. Honda’s efforts produced a 10-percent uptick compared with September 2016.

Yet despite the big gains from the two major players, the upper class, the midsize segment still declined 7 percent in September because of sharp declines by many members of the middle class.

That means Camry and Accord market share continues to rise. That means the slice of the market earned by the middle class continues to shrink.

This is the sixteenth edition of TTAC’s Midsize Sedan Deathwatch. The midsize sedan as we know it — “midsizedus sedanicus” in the original latin — isn’t going anywhere any time soon, but the ongoing sales contraction will result in a reduction of mainstream intermediate sedans in the U.S. market.

How do we know? It already has.

It’s not a new story, but it’s a story exacerbated by the transition from generation of the Camry to another. In September 2016, the Camry and Accord combined for 34 percent of the midsize market. One year later, the top-selling duo’s slice shot up not a little bit to 41 percent, a startling shift that came at the expense of vehicles such as the Nissan Altima, Hyundai Sonata, and Volkswagen Passat most of all.

That trio of mid-pack cars owned just 20 percent of America’s midsize sedan segment in September 2017, down seven percentage points from a year ago.

Of course, a market share loss of that magnitude doesn’t come merely because of the success of top-tier models. Nissan, Hyundai, and Volkswagen reported Altima, Sonata, and Passat declines of 34 percent, 36 percent, and 27 percent respectively. Nor were sharp declines reported by that trio the only momentous decreases. The Subaru Legacy tumbled 35 percent, the Mazda 6 was down 25 percent, the transitioning and semi-upmarket Buick Regal tumbled 57 percent. Unexpected were the improvements reported by the Ford Fusion, Chevrolet Malibu, and Kia Optima, a trio of midsize cars that’s still failing to match last year’s pace on year-to-date terms.

Despite a handful of cars that posted notable improvements, the midsize segment’s decline was still twice as harsh as the overall passenger car sector’s slide. Midsize cars accounted for 10.4 percent of America’s new vehicle sales in September 2017, down from 11.9 percent a year ago.

Five years ago, midsize cars accounted for more than 16 percent of U.S. new vehicle sales and the Camry and Accord produced “only” 3 out of every 10 sales in the midsize segment. Now the duo generates 4 out of every 10 midsize car sales.

The rich get richer.

[Image: Hyundai. Chart: The Truth About Cars]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 35 comments
  • Lastwgn Lastwgn on Oct 06, 2017

    Here's my story on this subject. This summer we needed to revise our fleet. It consisted of a CX-3, an RX-8 and a Miata. Needed a true 5 passenger car and the rotary was, sadly, losing compression. Best car ever but for that. Wife's car was the CX-3. She really liked it after driving a Tribute for 10 years. I went to the Mazda dealer fully intending to buy a top of the line Mazda6. Drove the car. Very, very fine car. But, something was missing. What I would refer to as the "hoot to drive" factor. It was just not as tossable as I wanted. My wife would not have wanted a 6 because due to hip and back pains does not like to get too far down into a car on a daily basis. Which is why the CX-3 and not the 3. My plan then shifted. I get the CX-3, which on a daily basis is a hoot to drive, and she could have a CX-5. So I drive a CX-5. Much as I am a car guy, I found the dynamics of the 2017 CX-5 to be better than the 6. I was personally stunned, but from a seat of the pants feel, the CX-5 was blast where the 6 was exceptionally refined. Bottom line, I went to the dealer to buy a fully optioned 6 GT and left with a new CX-5 Touring. My wife loves the CX-5 and will likely drive that for another 10 years just like her Tribute. I have the CX-3 for the time being, and we still have the Miata for summer cruises. In looking back on it, what I realized is that the 6 has a much longer wheelbase than the CX-5. Keep in mind that the CX-5 is based on the 3 and it begins to make some sense why the CX-5 dynamics were so much better feeling to me. The CX-3? It is not based on the 3 but based on the 2, which is why its dynamics are different still, even different from that of the Mazda3. So we now have the sports car, the fun and thrifty and maneuverable commuter, and the slightly larger ute for carrying 5 people comfortably as well as plenty of luggage space. But it is the vehicle dynamics of the CX-5 being so good that cost at least one sale of a Mazda6 this past July.

    • Mike978 Mike978 on Oct 08, 2017

      Thanks for sharing, interesting views. I can see why CUVs do well. Now I just want to see a CX5 Signature 2.5T

  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Oct 06, 2017

    I have to wonder when the pendulum will swing back. It'll be interesting to see how many manufacturers get caught with their pants down because they don't offer a decent midsizer when/of fuel prices spike again. I drove a Honda Accord Sport back to back with a Mazda6 Touring and agree the Honda felt and looked extremely cheap in comparison. The dealer also left a lot to be desired.

  • SCE to AUX Over the last 15 years and half a dozen vehicles, my Hyundais and Kias have been pretty cheap to maintain and insure - gas, hybrid, and electric.I hate buying tires - whose cost goes by diameter - and I'm dreading the purchase of new 19s for the Santa Fe.I also have an 08 Rabbit in my fleet, which is not cheap to fix.But I do my own wrenching, so that's the biggest factor.
  • MaintenanceCosts '19 Chevy Bolt: Next to nothing. A 12v battery and a couple cabin air filters. $400 over five years.'16 Highlander Hybrid, bought in 2019: A new set of brakes at all four corners, a new PCV valve, several oil changes, and two new 12v batteries (to be fair, the second one wasn't the car's fault - I had the misfortune of leaving it for a month with both third-row interior lights stealthily turned on by my kid). Total costs around $2500 over five years. Coming due: tires.'11 BMW 335i, bought in late 2022: A new HID low beam bulb (requiring removal of the front fascia, which I paid to have done), a new set of spark plugs, replacements for several flaking soft-touch parts, and two oil changes. Total costs around $1600 over a year and a half. Coming due: front main seal (slow leak).'95 Acura Legend, bought in 2015: Almost complete steering and suspension overhauls, timing belt and water pump, new rear brakes, new wheels and tires, new radiator, new coolant hoses throughout, new valve cover gaskets, new PS hoses, new EGR valve assembly, new power antenna, professional paint correction, and quite a few oil changes. Total costs around $12k over nine years. Coming due: timing belt (again), front diff seal.
  • SCE to AUX Given this choice - I'd take the Honda Civic Sport Hatchback (CVT). I 'built' mine for $28777.To my eye, the Civic beats the Corolla on looks these days.But for the same money, I can get an Elantra N-Line with 7-speed DCT, 201 HP, and good fuel economy, so I'd rather go for that.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X '19 Frontier Pro 4X. Next to nothing. All oil changes are on schedule. Still on original brakes at 79000 miles. Those are due soon. Estimate $1000 all in.
  • Dr.Nick The cars seem really expensive with tight back seats and Cadillac was on the list of the highest price gouging dealers coming out of COVID. I don’t understand the combination, shouldn’t they be offering deals if they are not selling?
Next