Piston Slap: VSC Light and the Puffer Fish Effect?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Looongtime TTAC commentator PrincipalDan writes:

I recently had an experience with CEL (check engine light) and VSC light (vehicle skid control) that left me scratching my head: I was on my way into Gallup (30 mile drive) and as I was getting up to speed on the highway the CEL and VSC came on at the same time. I know the CEL can be triggered by a dozen different things but seeing a constantly lit VSC was a new experience.

The vehicle (2010 Toyota Highlander) drove perfectly normally and I went on to my destination. I consulted the forums and they said the CEL would AUTOMATICALLY trigger the VSC light and that the VSC would basically be shut off by the triggering of a CEL. Dafuq!?!?!? Really Toyota?

A CEL (which could be triggered by something like an improperly tightened gas cap) will shut down one of the key components of the safety systems of the car? What’s the logic behind this? More lights means the average American is more likely to go to the dealer and get it checked out? Do all of the manufactures do this now?

BTW, my lights were triggered by a bad gas cap. Couldn’t get it to “click” anymore so I replaced — lights went away and problem solved.

Sajeev answers:

While it’s unfortunate the problem was the ubiquitous “gas cap fail,” the reality is most active handling systems tweak engine performance as part of their functionality. Be it ignition timing retardation or reining-in the electronic throttle, VSC needs an error-free engine computer. So why isn’t the car “smart” enough to leave the VSC on for seemingly irrelevant CEL warnings?

I suspect corporate lawyers (with undergrad engineering degrees) would beg to differ, risk aversion in mind. Why risk it when you might be wrong?

BONUS: A Piston Slap Nugget of Wisdom!

Think about this from another angle: consider the defense mechanism of the Puffer Fish. Now imagine a vehicle computer illuminating relevant idiot lights to save its bacon. It’s done in hopes the driver addresses the problem before it worsens, respecting your wallet, the manufacturer’s wallet, and/or our air quality. And lights can flash on/off when things are going sideways quickly. When things are hemorrhaging (literally), it’ll shut down the engine because you aren’t checking the oil pressure/level every second. That’s a smart defense strategy!

[Image: Shutterstock user gdainti]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • Whitworth Whitworth on Sep 15, 2017

    My guess is 99.9% of the reason this happens is fear of litigation and a way for the car companies to CYA. Which is unfortunate because I would argue it makes cars less safe. But there are all sorts of costs to living in an overly litigious society.

  • Manic Manic on Sep 15, 2017

    Had the same problem with my Lexus IS, gas cap tightening didn't help always, had to put some [euro] 98 octane fuel in and drive on a highway to get rid of the lights and text on info display. I thought some sensor was the problem.

  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
Next