Piston Slap: Of Ford's Locking Seatbelts, Differentials

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

This week, let’s answer two short questions with equally short answers! – SM

William writes:

I have a Ranger-based question for you: my 2010 XLT four-cylinder regular cab’s passenger side seatbelt will not “pull out” at random times when the wife is getting in the car. Is there a relay or something that controls that?

Sajeev answers:

I do love it when a question’s answered by my shop manual library. Per 2011 Ranger manual, you have a Belt Tension Sensor (BTS), which is a pretensioner assembly within the seat-mounted buckle. This interfaces with the seat-belt assembly, presumably getting a signal from the seatbelt to activate in an accident.

Long story short: I can’t tell which triggers which, so either the BTS is flaking out or the tensioner assembly in the B-pillar is giving out bad advice. Good luck with the diagnosis and repair.

John writes:

I saw a vid of the clutch controlled rear “diff” used on the all-wheel-drive Focus RS in which there is no spider gear set, just the slippage of the inner drive clutch to allow turning. I do understand how the use of this setup along with good computer control of the clutches can provide some real gains in handling and safety. My question is one of life span and the reliability of this setup: will it last 100K miles, when does it start to lose accuracy, and at what cost can it be rebuilt? And of course, when will the tuners be able to program this “monster”?

Sajeev answers:

This video perhaps?

This unit’s durability won’t be a concern for most, especially for its first owner. The computer turns down the power when the differential feels the heat, suggesting there’s no problem on public roads with legal driving, or many weekends of drag strip action, monthly autocross dashes, and even the occasional (non-endurance racing) track day.

Just don’t modify it! Or buy a used one with no service history, signs of being recently returned back to stock, indications it’s been driven hard and slid into a hedge, etc.

This is still a mass-market vehicle dressed up to play with the high-power, high-dollar sports and GT platforms. If this hypothetical is a big concern for would-be Focus RS owners, keep the car bone stock with the exception of a differential cooler. Or use the money for something loony like a boosted Coyote Mustang/ LSX Camaro/ 370Z with appropriate suspension upgrades to keep the power planted(ish), any number of track-ready pre-owned German machines on a purpose-built sporting chassis…or a C6 Z06 and spank ’em all.

[Image: Shutterstock user jeffy11390]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 25 comments
  • Redapple Redapple on Jun 02, 2017

    Lockers are complicated and expensive. Stay with the tried and true and simple. Posi. With side gears and spring clutch packs. 1/4 the cost of a locker. longer life. Locker added performance not worth the added $.

    • Gtem Gtem on Jun 04, 2017

      "longer life." I'd strongly disagree there. I also don't see how they're much more complex than an LSD. LSDs are the ones that wear their clutch packs out, can't say I've ever heard the same of a manually actuated locking rear diff, short of a very un-used one getting a frozen actuator.

  • AVT AVT on Jun 02, 2017

    Isn't a posi basically a locker, just without manual control since it "always on." Thus the reason they suck in snow since the back end goes out in turns since the wheels are still spinning at the same rate.

    • See 1 previous
    • Gtem Gtem on Jun 04, 2017

      AVT you're probably thinking of GM's "G80" auto/spin locker. It does in fact fully lock up the rear axle when a speed differential of 120rpm is detected between the rear wheels. Most "true" LSDs are never fully locked up, there is a limit to the amount of torque that can be transferred.

  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
Next