BMW Drops Manual Transmission From Best Model to Help Pay for R&D

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

BMW plans to streamline its manufacturing process by providing fewer model variants and eliminating less popular engine or equipment options. The goal here is to free up capital for research and development spending in the coming years, according to a Wednesday announcement from the brand’s chief finance officer, Nicolas Peter.

With most German automakers already pushing heavily into the realm of electric vehicles, BMW’s strong presence in China is forcing it to further bolster its efforts in EV development. The country’s particularly aggressive emission regulations and mandates on electric vehicle sales means any manufacturer hoping to persist within its borders will have to ensure 12 percent of its fleet is electric by 2020 — and BMW isn’t ready.

As a result, the automaker is trimming fat wherever it can find it. Unfortunately, that means eliminating the manual gearbox for the 2 Series in the United States and abandoning certain engine options for models across the globe. While BMW wasn’t explicit as to which motors won’t be returning, odds are good it will be the fun ones that don’t sell as well, plus the diesels.

“In the 5 series we have four diesel engines on offer. I would not bet on there being four diesel engines on offer in the next generation vehicle,” Peter explained.

While depriving North America of a manual transmission variant of its most enjoyable-to-drive car won’t win it new fans, BMW is responding out of necessity. According to Reuters, the automaker spent 5.5 percent of its total revenue on R&D in 2016 and needs to bring that up swiftly if it is to have EVs ready for China.

While sales in the U.S. have stagnated slightly, BMW has witnessed double-digit sales growth in China and remains on track to keep pace with the launch of a longer-wheelbase 5 Series and a new X1, Peter said. But only if it can keep itself in the electric car game by boosting development, hence the cost-cutting measures.

However, BMW can’t simply terminate whole models from its lineup and expect to immediately turn a profit from electric vehicle sales — which are still weak, even globally. It needs to maintain internal combustion volume, but it doesn’t need to provide those vehicles with a plethora of options.

“We have over one hundred steering wheels on offer. Do we need that many variants?” Peter asked reporters.

If you can remember back to the 1990s, when Chrysler seemed to have only two steering wheels for its entire fleet, then you already know the answer to the question. No, of course not. No automaker needs one hundred distinctive steering wheels. That’s absolutely insane and BMW is right to scale back on them. We just wish they’d have stopped there and decided not to take away the manual-transmission 2 Series, as well.

[Image: BMW AG]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 28 comments
  • Car Ramrod Car Ramrod on Jun 29, 2017

    Sad. Never driven a 2 but I imagine they're loads of fun. I swapped into a lease on a 6 speed M3, and while it can pin me back in the seat while while guiding me to my destination and playing music through a decent stereo, its obnoxious rather than subtle and I'm sure it would be a nightmare after warranty. Someone else may pay to preserve it, but I'll focus on keeping my E39 M5 on the road instead. That'll be more satisfying and probably cheaper too. Sure every automaker is struggling to evolve, but this move by BMW feels like the nail in a coffin that's already welded shut.

  • Bastula Bastula on Jul 01, 2017

    Here's a free cost cutting suggestion. Use and or design amber rear turn signals that can work globally and not just outside North America. The BMWNA tail lights are quite inferior to the ECE versions and by some smart engineering I am sure they could solve this problem.

  • Tassos Jong-iL North Korea is saving pokemon cards and amibos to buy GM in 10 years, we hope.
  • Formula m Same as Ford, withholding billions in development because they want to rearrange the furniture.
  • EV-Guy I would care more about the Detroit downtown core. Who else would possibly be able to occupy this space? GM bought this complex - correct? If they can't fill it, how do they find tenants that can? Is the plan to just tear it down and sell to developers?
  • EBFlex Demand is so high for EVs they are having to lay people off. Layoffs are the ultimate sign of an rapidly expanding market.
  • Thomas I thought about buying an EV, but the more I learned about them, the less I wanted one. Maybe I'll reconsider in 5 or 10 years if technology improves. I don't think EVs are good enough yet for my use case. Pricing and infrastructure needs to improve too.
Next